Every pro-deather always, without fail, gets it wrong on abortion.

The simple fact of the matter is a fetus is a living human being. 

For starters, all of the biological markers for life are pregnant at fertilization. (1)

Furthermore, the fetus has a complete genetic code. (2)

The overwhelming majority of biologists, even liberal pro-abortion ones, believe that human life begins at conception. (3) 

Therefore, it is a human being in the earliest stages of life. Biologists and scientific studies both agree to this.

Moreover, abortion is a very dangerous procedure for the women involved, with approximately 10% of women having immediate complications from an abortion. (4)

Furthermore, a 1997 study in Finland found that women who aborted their baby are significantly more likely to die within one year than pregnant women who carried their baby to term. (4)

Additionally, two Denmark studies in 2012 that followed the entire female population of women in Denmark found that women who aborted their baby were significantly more likely to die within 10 years than women who carried to term, and also found that the risk of death INCREASES with every abortion. (4)

So not only does abortion kill the baby, it also is dangerous to the woman having an abortion.

SOURCES:

(1) https://www.justfacts.com/abortion#_ftn46

(2) https://www.justfacts.com/abortion#_ftn44

(3) https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3211703

(4) https://afterabortion.org/abortion-risks-abortion-complications-abortion-dangers-abortion-side-effects/

Guess you could call it Karma.

I am extremely sure that the reason that abortion-having women in a pro-choice place like a Scandinavian nation would be more likely to die a year later is that most are poor.

Let me explain; in those nations it's public-funded to get an abortion so the poor can actually afford it and are the most likely to get it as they are the most likely to not have the sufficient lifestyle room or finances to raise a child.

Being poor doesn't kill oneself but the environment of poorer areas is such that the edge found is explainable by that.

The poor are also getting pregnant and having babies in a publicly-funded country, though.

Why do people think that being poor or not having the "finances" to raise a child is a valid reason to abort them? Pro-deathers love to use that argument.

They don't seem to understand that it is borderline eugenics. 

Although their argument may not have any racial undertones (it does sometimes), it appears that they really don't want people who they view as poor or not very fortunate, to produce offspring. Then you have women who use being "poor" as an excuse to abort their baby, knowing that the real reason is that they don't want to look after it. 

Where there's a will, there's a way.