--> @TWS1405lolYou seem to be totally ignorant of the fact that *every* criticism you have in response to other people applies with complete accuracy to you.Fools will be fools, though.
Nivuce_II: I just don't understand this dialogue method.Person A: "You need to work on your punctuation, not to mention grammar."Person B: "What mistakes do you think I'm making?"Person A: "I refuse to answer actually, but just stop because the mistakes exist."
Polytheist _Witch: Alternating the DNA of the fetus is not the mother doing what it wants to its body eventually the child will be born with an alteration. If the mother drinks while pregnant and the child is born addicted to alcohol the mother is guilty of a crime because the child is born. The child is born genetically altered the child is born. You seem to be confused about what a born person is and what a not born person is.
--> @Polytheist-WitchDo you acknowledge that it is a logical contradiction to state that someone "can and cannot do whatever they want with their body when pregnant." Yes or no, is that a logical contradiction?
Nivuce_II: I just don't understand this dialogue method.Person A: "You need to work on your punctuation, not to mention grammar."Person B: "What mistakes do you think I'm making?"Person A: "I refuse to answer actually, but just stop because the mistakes exist."If you don’t recognize your own mistakes. You might need special help.
-->@TWS1405lolYou seem to be totally ignorant of the fact that *every* criticism you have in response to other people applies with complete accuracy to you.Fools will be fools, though.
Person A: "I refuse to answer actually, but just stop because the mistakes exist."
What is the argument for why abortion is not one of those things?
The mother has the right to her own body, it’s the fetus that is the foreign occupier. Therefore the mother has the right to decide if the fetus remains there.
- Does the mother have the right to decide to remove a human being from her body, even when she was the one that placed them there, in a state where the human being is temporarily dependent on her for its survival?
If the human being existed prior to her “placing them there” then my position would be very different.
Novice_II:Does the mother have the right to decide to remove a human being from her body, even when she was the one that placed them there, in a state where the human being is temporarily dependent on her for its survival?
= "I know you are, but what am I" childish banality.Meaning, you have no intelligent rebuttal
- First, I am not seeing the answer to my question, so I am not sure why you are not answering.
Second, in this case you would say that an abortion from an IVF embryo transfer should be illegal given that the human being already exists?
--> @TWS1405= "I know you are, but what am I" childish banality.Meaning, you have no intelligent rebuttal
- You haven't offered any intelligent arguments, instead just relying on opinion and then repeating that same opinion over, and over again.
- You're too arrogant and too stupid for anyone to have a constructive and reasonable discussion with.
- Several people have brought valid arguments, thoughts, and responses to this post, but because you're so narrow and seemingly incapable of critical thought, all you can do is dismiss them.
- It is YOU who routinely uses insults and ad hominem attacks. This is to the extent that even the OP included blatant and childish attacks along the lines of "these people don't advocate my view on this matter, so they are stupid".
- In addition to that, you use extremely repetitive and poorly applied retorts.
Can you grasp that, or is it another "false equivalency fallacy"?
Ben Shapiro's argument is it is always a human, not that it has potential to become one:This is a point that more than 90% of biologists assert is true. It is also backed by the fact that a baby in the womb meets all the biological determiners for life: growth, metabolism, reproduction, and response to stimuli. [1]The biggest flaw in abortionists' reasoning is this: they make arbitrary, unscientific claims for when a human being becomes a human being.Show me a science textbook that says a human being is only a human being when it is born? Or what about a biological study that proves pre-birth humans are not human beings.Tell me where geneticists have found that pre-birth humans do not have the requisite genetic makeup for being a human being?Tell me where biologists have proven that a pre-birth human is not alive in the womb?Genetically and biologically it is a human being. No amount of personal feelings can change that fact.SOURCES:
