Most people dont know how badly the pedophiles are treated in prison

In fact, if you want him/her to be prevented from pedophilic acts and genuinely believed he/she was unaware of the danger of prison why would you warn him/her? Why are you trying to keep pedophiles free?

I suppose you could see trying to keep a pedophile from acting on his impulse as  trying to keep him free, and I have no idea why that's a problem for you, but then again, I don't really understand your alternative logic.

In fact, if you want him/her to be prevented from pedophilic acts and genuinely believed he/she was unaware of the danger of prison why would you warn him/her? Why are you trying to keep pedophiles free?

I suppose you could see trying to keep a pedophile from acting on his impulse as  trying to keep him free, and I have no idea why that's a problem for you, but then again, I don't really understand your alternative logic.

If he/she thought it was legal then he/she would just walk up to someone and ask. If he/she was informed that it was illegal he/she would create a secret plot. Got it?

--> @Best.Korea

I feel ur pain man the capitalist scum police once searched the basement of the church were I work as a priest and they found the kids and I went to jail and the other prisoners didnt take kindly to pedofile priests so i took it in the booty. Wasn't fun man. 2/10. Would not recommend to other pedofiles. North Korea is a better place to live as a proud pedofile.

It was a joke. Just some dark humor and a throwback to the sort of trolling I used to pull on DDO.

I have a better way to find out what someone really wants, ask them; not yourself

Yes, usually, you should ask them. But there are situations where that is not possible.

In those situations peoole usually confuse "what does a child want" with what they want.

-->

@Swagnarok

--> @Best.Korea

I feel ur pain man the capitalist scum police once searched the basement of the church were I work as a priest and they found the kids and I went to jail and the other prisoners didnt take kindly to pedofile priests so i took it in the booty. Wasn't fun man. 2/10. Would not recommend to other pedofiles. North Korea is a better place to live as a proud pedofile.

--> @Shila

It was a joke. Just some dark humor and a throwback to the sort of trolling I used to pull on DDO.

--> @Best.Korea

I said that because he’s arguing with you, lol. You’re an obvious troll (or worse, a pedo-troll) who can barely even speak English, let alone defend your pedophilic tendencies in a compelling way. Not that it’s possible to do that, but you’re really failing miserably at convincing anyone here.

All you can come up with in response to me was “where is harm, there is no harm...what harm...no harm.” Well fuck, that’s one powerful argument you’ve got there.

-->

@ahiyah

Now you insult other people too?

Will you insult anyone who disagrees with you?

You are even confirming Best.Korea has one powerful argument.

Best.Korea found you very insulting.

-> @Shila

You are even confirming Best.Korea has one powerful argument.

Uh, no. 

Best.Korea found you very insulting.

I’m starting to think THEY may be a child. Only children or adults with developmental issues would see my comments and just think “insults”, and give that more credence than anything else I said. 

Most pedophiles probably are mentally delayed though.

In every context, the greater consent comes as most important.

--> @Best.Korea

In every context, the greater consent comes as most important.

Ok, my last try: I gave you an example of where this concept of greater consent was not more important, buying an "as is" house. You said "well greater consent is violated but no one is to blame"

Well now let's say everybody knows about the defect, but the buyer wants to take it on anyway.

If the seller doesn't think it's a good idea, they are not doing something immoral by selling the house. The buyer, after being given all relevant information possessed by other parties in the interaction, has a right to his or her own judgement.

Although it is moral for the seller to refuse to sell, it is not immoral to sell. The consent of a peer absent of fraud is sufficient. Thus "greater consent" fails to function as the "unified field theory" of moral interaction.

All you can come up with in response to me is “where is harm, there is no harm...what harm...no harm.” Well fuck, that’s one powerful argument you’ve got there.

--> @ahiyah

All you can come up with in response to me is “where is harm, there is no harm...what harm...no harm.” Well fuck, that’s one powerful argument you’ve got there.

It's all the argument you need when the burden of proof isn't yours. If it weren't for Lemming posting a link to studies there wouldn't be an original argument to engage with. I know most of you are emotionally impaired on this issue but that is really extra pathetic.

The way Shila can't recognize (or pretends not to recognize) sarcasm and Sidewinder is hiding under a couch makes it worse. If it was twitter or a video game chat that would be one thing, but this is one of the last of a dying breed of debate sites. If reason is dead here, it's dead everywhere.

This thread has emptied my "faith in humanity" meter. It takes a while to fill that, very annoying.

Well now let's say everybody knows about the defect, but the buyer wants to take it on anyway

If the buyer knows about the defect and agrees to it, there is no greater consent being violated by anyone.

You wanted to know how to deal with buyers and sellers of a house and what to consider before giving consent.

->

@Shila

You wanted to know how to deal with buyers and sellers of a house and what to consider before giving consent.

No I didn't, not even close.