CHINA Continues To Commit SEVERE HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES - Congressional Research Service

Author: Public-Choice

Posts

Total: 43
Public-Choice
Public-Choice's avatar
Debates: 19
Posts: 1,065
3
4
8
Public-Choice's avatar
Public-Choice
3
4
8
Selected Human Rights Issues

Under Xi’s leadership, China has further restricted and suppressed civil society, religious groups, human rights defenders, speech, and academic discourse. The government has enacted laws and policies that enhance the legal authority of the state to counter perceived ideological, social, political, and security threats. It has closed much of the space that had previously existed for limited social activism, such as that relating to environmental issues, women’s rights, and gay rights. In 2021, the government widened the tightening of freedoms to include some relatively non-political entities, such as tech giants, private education companies, and social media influencers.

The Department of State’s annual report on human rights practices states that in 2021, “[PRC] authorities continued to impose ever-tighter control of all print, broadcast, electronic, and social media and regularly used them to propagate government views and CCP ideology.” The PRC government oversees one of the most extensive and stringent internet censorship systems in the world, which includes blocking major U.S. news and social media sites and censoring domestic social media platforms. In 2021, PRC authorities blocked Signal, a U.S.-based messaging app popular with Chinese social activists, dissidents, and journalists. PRC internet platforms have censored online criticism of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and disseminated pro-Russian views and misinformation about the war. An online video (“Voices of April”) compiling audio recordings of people describing the severe 2022 Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown in Shanghai circulated widely before authorities blocked it.

According to the Department of State, “[PRC] law grants public security officers broad administrative detention powers and the ability to detain individuals for extended periods without formal arrest or criminal charges” and police target lawyers, human rights activists, journalists, religious leaders and adherents, and former political prisoners and their family members for arbitrary detention or arrest. The nonprofit Dui Hua Foundation has compiled over 7,600 cases of political and religious prisoners in China as of June 2022. PRC leaders long have asserted that human rights standards vary by country, and that a country’s human rights policies are an “internal affair.” In 2021, the PRC government released a white paper on China’s democratic development that emphasized “material and cultural prosperity” when referring to human rights.

Religious and Ethnic Minority Policies

In 2016, Xi Jinping launched a policy known as “Sinicization,” by which China’s religious and ethnic minorities are required to “assimilate” or conform to majority Han Chinese culture as defined by the CCP and adhere to “core socialist values.” The PRC government has implemented policies in Tibetan areas, Xinjiang, and Inner Mongolia requiring that nearly all primary school courses be taught in Mandarin rather than in minority languages. Since 2018, new regulations require religious organizations to obtain government permission for nearly every aspect of their operations, submit to greater state supervision, and register all clergy in a national database. The government has continued to pressure unofficial Christian congregations to register with the state and to persecute practitioners of the Falun Gong spiritual exercise. The State Department has designated China as a “Country of Particular Concern” for “particularly severe violations of religious freedom” under the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 (P.L. 105-292) in every annual designation list since the law’s passage.

Authorities have carried out coercive assimilation and employment in Tibetan areas, including by “forcibly resettling and urbanizing nomads and farmers, weakening Tibetan-language education in public schools, and weakening monasteries’ role in Tibetan society,” according to the Department of State. The PRC government insists that Chinese laws, and not Tibetan Buddhist religious traditions, govern the process by which lineages of Tibetan lamas are reincarnated, and that the state has the right to choose the successor to the Tibetan spiritual leader, the 87- year-old 14th Dalai Lama, who lives in exile in India.

Source:
Public-Choice
Public-Choice's avatar
Debates: 19
Posts: 1,065
3
4
8
Public-Choice's avatar
Public-Choice
3
4
8
Anyone else see parallels between Communist China and what Biden said in his speech about what he wants to do to dissenters and Trump supporters?
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@Public-Choice
Anyone else see parallels between Communist China and what Biden said in his speech about what he wants to do to dissenters and Trump supporters?
What did Biden say and what do you think he said?

Public-Choice
Public-Choice's avatar
Debates: 19
Posts: 1,065
3
4
8
Public-Choice's avatar
Public-Choice
3
4
8
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
"Look, extreme MAGA Republicans don’t just threaten our personal rights and our economic security, they embrace political violence.  (Applause.)  Look — no, look, the reason — I’m not talking all Republicans, I’m talking about these extreme MAGA Republicans.

Think about it.  Think about it.  The definition of democracy is you accept the will of the people when the votes are honestly counted.  (Applause.)  These guys don’t do it.

Name me a democracy in the world where a leader argues to engage in violence.  To this day, MAGA Republicans in Congress defend the mob that stormed the Capitol, and people died later." - Labor Day Speech

Those "MAGA Republicans" are sitting in a prison right now before even being tried. And this President says anyone who questions the results of the election is a threat to democracy and ties them to a mob of mostly Antifa members and fringe right lunatics who do not represent a MAGA Republican.

This is no differen than the rhetoric of Xi or the actions of the CCP. We have political prisoners who were denied bail and are imprisoned awaiting a trial.

Right now House Democrats are condemning 100,000 protesters at an event, calling them all dangerous terrorists who stormed the Capitol when most of the violence happened before Trump even finished speaking.

And you're telling me there are no parallels today to Communist China? That Biden and Democrats are not acting anything remotely like a communist regime?

Read the CRS on China, then think about what Biden said and you'll see it's true.

SOURCE:



IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@Public-Choice
Those "MAGA Republicans" are sitting in a prison right now before even being tried. And this President says anyone who questions the results of the election is a threat to democracy and ties them to a mob of mostly Antifa members and fringe right lunatics who do not represent a MAGA Republican.
Ya, that’s how the criminal justIce system often works in this country. People commit crimes, violent crimes. They are arrested and go before a judge who decides if it is in the peoples interest to offer bail while they await trial. That’s not unusual, right? Are you stupid or something?

The election was run fairly. This has been confirmed by numerous official agencies ( Bill Barr’s Dept of Justice) including the Department of Homeland Security and international election monitors. The complaints were heard in numerous courts, including by judges appointed by Trump himself. The complaints were all thrown out. The only reason people are questioning the results is the guy who lost, a habitual liar, had been telling people lies. Dozens of Republicans who testified at the 1/6 committee testified the election was fair and Trump tried to steal it. Nobody arrested by the FBI after being caught on camera in the Capital riot was connected to ANTIFA. However many people  arrested by the FBI admitted to being a MAGA Republicans.

You have your head up your ass.

IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@Public-Choice
when most of the violence happened before Trump even finished speaking.
That’s factually untrue. You are a liar. A Christian liar.

IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
JOINT STATEMENT FROM ELECTIONS INFRASTRUCTURE GOVERNMENT COORDINATING COUNCIL & THE ELECTION INFRASTRUCTURE SECTOR COORDINATING EXECUTIVE COMMITTEES
Original release date: November 12, 2020
WASHINGTON – The members of Election Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council (GCC) Executive Committee – Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Assistant Director Bob Kolasky, U.S. Election Assistance Commission Chair Benjamin Hovland, National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS) President Maggie Toulouse Oliver, National Association of State Election Directors (NASED) President Lori Augino, and Escambia County (Florida) Supervisor of Elections David Stafford – and the members of the Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Council (SCC) – Chair Brian Hancock (Unisyn Voting Solutions), Vice Chair Sam Derheimer (Hart InterCivic), Chris Wlaschin (Election Systems & Software), Ericka Haas (Electronic Registration Information Center), and Maria Bianchi (Democracy Works) - released the following statement:
“The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history. Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result. 
“When states have close elections, many will recount ballots. All of the states with close results in the 2020 presidential race have paper records of each vote, allowing the ability to go back and count each ballot if necessary. This is an added benefit for security and resilience. This process allows for the identification and correction of any mistakes or errors. There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.
“Other security measures like pre-election testing, state certification of voting equipment, and the U.S. Election Assistance Commission’s (EAC) certification of voting equipment help to build additional confidence in the voting systems used in 2020.
“While we know there are many unfounded claims and opportunities for misinformation about the process of our elections, we can assure you we have the utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections, and you should too. When you have questions, turn to elections officials as trusted voices as they administer elections.”

IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
The 2020 presidential contest is “the most secure election in U.S. history,” acting Department of Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf said Tuesday, while urging voters to be patient for results and rely on trusted sources of information as they await updates on the outcome.
Speaking during a morning press conference, Mr. Wolf and Chris Krebs, director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, said the federal government was working with all 50 states to communicate quickly about potential threats to the election and so far had not seen any signs of foreign interference on Election Day that could degrade or corrupt the voting process.
“We have no indications that a foreign actor has succeeded in compromising or affecting the actual votes in this election,” Mr. Wolf said.
Independent election security experts generally agree that the 2020 election is more secure from foreign interference and cyberattacks than the 2016 election, as states have adopted more resiliency measures like paper backup ballots and expanded cooperation with federal authorities. Iran and Russia have attempted to interfere in the election in recent weeks and months, officials have said, but those efforts have been relatively limited.

Nov 3, 2020 at 10:13 am ET
Officials Say 2020 Election Is Most Secure In History, but Plead for Patience
By Dustin Volz
Wall Street Journal 


IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
“IT WAS BULLSHIT”

Bill Barr did not think much of Donald Trump’s lies about the 2020 election. According to his videotaped testimony before the House select committee investigatinghow those lies resulted in the storming of the Capitol on January 6, 2021, Trump’s former Attorney General told Trump this to his face. Among his choice words about various claims by the Trump legal team: “bullshit,” “completely bullshit,” “absolute rubbish,” “idiotic,” “bogus,” “stupid,” “crazy,” “crazy stuff,” “complete nonsense,” and “a great, great disservice to the country.” What’s more, Barr added, if Trump actually believed the garbage he was spewing about the election, then he had become dangerously “detached from reality.”

Vici
Vici's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 333
2
4
7
Vici's avatar
Vici
2
4
7
well considering how they created the virus, I wouldn't put it past them.  who actually disagrees with this post? W OP
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,190
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Public-Choice
The understanding of Human Rights varies.

There is no absolute authority with the power to dictate what is actually right or wrong. 

One can only implement authority by abusing another person's sensibilities.
Elliott
Elliott's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 407
2
2
6
Elliott's avatar
Elliott
2
2
6
-->
@Vici
well considering how they created the virus, I wouldn't put it past them.  who actually disagrees with this post? W OP
There is no evidence to support allegations that the virus was created in a Wuhan laboratory beyond conjecture. Scientific evidence shows it evolved naturally.

Public-Choice
Public-Choice's avatar
Debates: 19
Posts: 1,065
3
4
8
Public-Choice's avatar
Public-Choice
3
4
8
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
There was plenty of evidence though:


Those government sources didnt cite any evidence to back their claim. They fail the burden of proof lol
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,288
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Elliott
That article is 2 years old lol. When we had a lot less information.
Public-Choice
Public-Choice's avatar
Debates: 19
Posts: 1,065
3
4
8
Public-Choice's avatar
Public-Choice
3
4
8
-->
@Elliott
There is no evidence to support allegations that the virus was created in a Wuhan laboratory
Sigh...

Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,288
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Public-Choice
It's circular reasoning. The government can be trusted because government officials say they can be trusted.
Elliott
Elliott's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 407
2
2
6
Elliott's avatar
Elliott
2
2
6
-->
@Greyparrot
That article is 2 years old lol. When we had a lot less information.
Then perhaps you could provide a link to this new information and I would suggest a reputable scientific site and not some public media source, which may simply seek to provoke controversy.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,288
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Elliott
Provoke controversy?? Dude, the site I clicked bombarded me with pharmecuetical ads. You have some chutzpah with that claim.
Public-Choice
Public-Choice's avatar
Debates: 19
Posts: 1,065
3
4
8
Public-Choice's avatar
Public-Choice
3
4
8
-->
@Elliott
What about the link I cited from 2020 from Newsweek? Does that count?

Also, I have seen some studies comparing COVID to HIV. The argument was COVID was somehow fused with HIV to make it more viral.

I have actually heard your argument earlier on in the pandemic, like 2019 to early 2020. But by 2021 even the former CDC head (in 2021) was saying it was probably manufactured in a lab, according to this exclusive interview with Fox News:

I am not citing Fox News because I believe they are a reputable news outlet, btw. I am citing it because they interviewed the former head of the CDC and he is a virologist as well. That is certainly a primary source for my assertion that the former head of the CDC claimed it was manufactured in a lab.

So to claim it is mere conjecture is to claim that nobody seriously believes the claims, and yet here we have the former director of the CDC not only touting it, but also explaining his reasoning behind it from a virology perspective.

There's also the paper written by one virologist who is the chair of a pharmaceutical company and one former MI6 head that the Daily Mail had an exclusive into:

The authors claim there is no way COVID had a natural origin and must have been created in a lab. Here is the original paper:
Elliott
Elliott's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 407
2
2
6
Elliott's avatar
Elliott
2
2
6
-->
@Greyparrot
Provoke controversy?? Dude, the site I clicked bombarded me with pharmecuetical ads. You have some chutzpah with that claim.
I use an addblocker. Carrying adverts doesn’t equate to provoking controversy. However, I am wary of news sources and having done a quick check on Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News (GEN) it would seem that is largely free from bias. On “Media Bias Fact Check” it is received High for factual reporting. Here is a link:
 

You have no further information on the origins of coronavirus and the possibility of genetic manipulation then, as I would be genuinely interested.


Public-Choice
Public-Choice's avatar
Debates: 19
Posts: 1,065
3
4
8
Public-Choice's avatar
Public-Choice
3
4
8
-->
@Elliott
 On “Media Bias Fact Check” it is received High for factual reporting.
Media Bias Fact Check is a hack website run by a climate-change cult member and a hardcore anti-alternative-medicine skeptic.

His idea of science is a democratic vote by western, particularly Western European Liberal Democrat and Corporate American, scientists. And his idea of a fact check is whatever the ICFN says is fact, even though the ICFN has promoted conspiracy theories, like the Trump-Russia Collusion, and other patently false statements as fact.

Just ask the folks over at https://examine.com/ or https://www.lifeextension.com/ if there is zero credible evidence that a great many alternative treatments work. They have literally hundreds of studies that prove many alternative treatments work, and hundreds of studies showing which ones probably don't work. Alternative medicine is not pseudoscience. Many of the assertions of it have been proven in multiple studies, showing high falsifiability. But the owner of Media Bias Fact Check rejects anything that isn't Western Liberal Democrat Corporatist medicine as fact.

In fact here is his opinion of The Epoch Times:
Further, the Epoch Times frequently publishes pseudoscience news, such as Supernormal Abilities Developed Through Meditation: Dr. Dean Radin Discusses. They also publish false claims from Pseudoscience and anti-vaccination activist Joeseph Mercola who has a long track record of publishing misinformation. Finally, the above referenced NBC News report states, “In addition to claims that alien abductions are real and the “deep state engineered the drug epidemic,” the channel pushes the QAnon conspiracy theory, which falsely posits that the same “Spygate” cabal is a front for a global pedophile ring being taken down by Trump.”
The "pseudoscience" that The Epoch Times promotes is articles written by medical doctors and psychologists on meditation and other alternative and ancient Chinese treatments. I would know, since, until very recently, I was a regular reader of their website. Joseph Mercola is not a pseudoscientist. He is a medical doctor with an actual medical degree who actually cites studies in his articles. You don't have to agree with him. But calling a medical doctor who cites research and studies in every article a "pseudoscientist" is highly spurious behavior.

One again, you don't have to agree with Dr. Joseph Mercola. But a medical doctor publishing summaries of research is certainly not "pseudoscience" simply because his positions disagree with yours. That is extremely lazy fact checking.

Also, did you notice how they called a scientist giving his opinion on supernormal abilities pseudoscience? The CIA extensively researched ESP and meditation for years and came to the same conclusion. Is the CIA a bunch of pseudoscientific hacks?

The only thing that website consistently gets right is the bias of the websites. But any attempts at labeling them pseudoscience or propaganda is based purely on his own cherry picking of sources. Not based on any real, objective criterion.

One such example was when he "fact checked" Just Facts by using a gun study with atrocious methodology as a response to an article in Just Facts Daily that cited at least 5 or 6 studies and government reports on gun violence. He later had to heighten his credibility rating for Just Facts after the website eviscerated his "fact check" of Just Facts.

The guy who runs that website is a hardcore liberal Democrat who lets his bias show on fact checks. BUT, he does get the bias correct. And that is one reason I consistently go to the website. Just solely to find out the bias of a website.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,288
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Elliott
I am transcribing notes for a deaf person at the moment so I don't have time to do in depth research right now. Do you have any articles from this year?
Elliott
Elliott's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 407
2
2
6
Elliott's avatar
Elliott
2
2
6
-->
@Public-Choice
 On “Media Bias Fact Check” it is received High for factual reporting.
Media Bias Fact Check is a hack website run by a climate-change cult member and a hardcore anti-alternative-medicine skeptic.

His idea of science is a democratic vote by western, particularly European Liberal Democrat and Corporate American, scientists. And his idea of a fact check is whatever the ICFN says is fact, even though the ICFN has promoted conspiracy theories, like the Trump-Russia Collusion, and other patently false statements as fact.

Just ask the folks over at https://examine.com/ or https://www.lifeextension.com/ if there is zero credible evidence that a great many alternative treatments work. They have literally hundreds of studies that prove many alternative treatments work, and hundreds of studies showing which ones probably don't work. Alternative medicine is not pseudoscience. Many of the assertions of it have been proven in multiple studies, showing high falsifiability. But the owner of Media Bias Fact Check rejects anything that isn't Western Liberal Democrat Corporatist medicine as fact.

In fact here is his opinion of The Epoch Times:
Further, the Epoch Times frequently publishes pseudoscience news, such as Supernormal Abilities Developed Through Meditation: Dr. Dean Radin Discusses. They also publish false claims from Pseudoscience and anti-vaccination activist Joeseph Mercola who has a long track record of publishing misinformation. Finally, the above referenced NBC News report states, “In addition to claims that alien abductions are real and the “deep state engineered the drug epidemic,” the channel pushes the QAnon conspiracy theory, which falsely posits that the same “Spygate” cabal is a front for a global pedophile ring being taken down by Trump.”
The "pseudoscience" that The Epoch Times promotes is articles written by medical doctors and psychologists on meditation and other alternative and ancient Chinese treatments. I would know, since, until very recently, I was a regular reader of their website. Joseph Mercola is not a pseudoscientist. He is a medical doctor with an actual medical degree who actually cites studies in his articles. You don't have to agree with him. But calling a medical doctor who cites research and studies in every article a "pseudoscientist" is highly spurious behavior.

One again, you don't have to agree with Dr. Joseph Mercola. But a medical doctor publishing summaries of research is certainly not "pseudoscience" simply because his positions disagree with yours. That is extremely lazy fact checking.

Also, did you notice how they called a scientist giving his opinion on supernormal abilities pseudoscience? The CIA extensively researched ESP and meditation for years and came to the same conclusion. Is the CIA a bunch of pseudoscientific hacks?

The only thing that website consistently gets right is the bias of the websites. But any attempts at labeling them pseudoscience or propaganda is based purely on his own cherry picking of sources. Not based on any real, objective criterion.

One such example was when he "fact checked" Just Facts by using a gun study with atrocious methodology as a response to an article in Just Facts Daily that cited at least 5 or 6 studies and government reports on gun violence. He later had to heighten his credibility rating for Just Facts after the website eviscerated his "fact check" of their website.

The guy who runs that website is a hardcore liberal Democrat who lets his bias show. BUT, he does get the bias correct. And that is one reason I consistently go to the website. Just solely to find out the bias of a website.
Thanks, I didn’t know all that, “Media Bias Fact Check” has certainly gone up in my estimation.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,288
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Public-Choice
I kinda have an issue with any site that offers critical thinking services for people who are unable to do it on their own.

That includes all fact "check" sites. If you are using any of those sites no matter what the bias is, it is an admission that you are unable to make your own evaluations and a confession that you need a "cheat sheet"

And we all know what happens when the cheat sheet is wrong :)
Public-Choice
Public-Choice's avatar
Debates: 19
Posts: 1,065
3
4
8
Public-Choice's avatar
Public-Choice
3
4
8
-->
@Elliott
What do you mean by gone up? Gone up in credibility? Or gone up in smoke?
Elliott
Elliott's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 407
2
2
6
Elliott's avatar
Elliott
2
2
6
-->
@Greyparrot
I am transcribing notes for a deaf person at the moment so I don't have time to do in depth research right now. Do you have any articles from this year?
No, nothing recent I’m afraid.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,288
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Elliott
That makes the claim a little bit suspicious then.

The scientific method relies on repeatable outcomes from similar data. If the claim is strong, this outcome should have some literature from this year.
Elliott
Elliott's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 407
2
2
6
Elliott's avatar
Elliott
2
2
6
-->
@Greyparrot
That makes the claim a little bit suspicious then.

The scientific method relies on repeatable outcomes from similar data. If the claim is strong, this outcome should have some literature from this year.
Or it could suggest that no new evidence is available.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,288
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Elliott
More likely no recent supporting evidence is available. It's why scientists ask for multiple studies to get a reliable conclusion.
Elliott
Elliott's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 407
2
2
6
Elliott's avatar
Elliott
2
2
6
-->
@Greyparrot
More likely no recent supporting evidence is available. It's why scientists ask for multiple studies to get a reliable conclusion.
If there is no evidence of genetic manipulation then I can’t see how you would try to find another lack of evidence to support the previous lack of evidence.