Do you plan on post-graduate study?
I’m strongly considering an econ PhD! Or potentially a masters in economics from outside the U.S. (e.g., at the LSE).
What are your thoughts on the debate format of this site?
I worry that it unfairly favors whoever gets the last word -- because in, say, a 10,000-character round, you have 10,000 characters of the final round, and that’s a huge advantage under tabula rasa judging. It’d be nice to replicate LD or Policy, and have a Neg block followed by a short last word for Aff.
Otherwise, I like it. I appreciate that it allows for incorporating evidence and making compelling arguments. I think the 4-point system is a bit silly, though (luckily you can opt out of it!), and the judging quality is not the best (nor is the quantity good).
Rather than your political views, may I ask to which school or schools of Economic thought you subscribe?
I feel like people on online forums care more about broad schools of economic thought than most economists do. I feel like it’s a fairly easy label or identifier that doesn’t capture much nuance.
That said, I’d say on business cycle macroeconomics, I’m somewhere in between the New Keynesians and market monetarists; I’m not sure that New Keynesians are right to treat price stickiness as more important than wage stickiness (i.e., their models often come to the conclusion that prices being slow to change affects the business cycle more than wages being slow to change) -- especially since we’re in the midst of an economic expansion where real wages are falling, which would be a bit more in line with old Keynesian or market monetarist thought.
As far as long-run economic growth goes, as well as microeconomics, I think the standard neoclassical paradigm is alright, but needs to be moderated and more driven by empirics.
I don’t believe I’ve interacted with you on this site! So I’m not sure I have one. Sorry about that!