Religion is an evolutionary advantage

You've just equivocated rape being evolutionary disadvantageous with it being disgusting. These two things not contingent upon each other. 

How does it not increase the gene pool? Evolution via natural selection is process which results in the adaptation of an organism to its environment by means of selectively reproducing changes in its genotype, or genetic constitution. A population which constantly rapes their kind will increase their gene pool exponentially, hence increasing the possibility for a desirable mutation. If we look purely evolutionarily, which is what you seem to be doing, the population with 100 people (90 percent of whom were conceived through rape) would be at a higher advantage than the population with 10 people (who committed no rape). 

You've just equivocated rape being evolutionary disadvantageous with it being disgusting. These two things not contingent upon each other. 

Nope. I've argued that it's disgusting **because** it's evolutionarily disadvantageous. 

I said it doesn't "help the genepool", not increase the genepool.

And how is it evolutionarily disadvantageous? 

Do you understand how evolution via natural selection works? Those who are aggressive survive, and as rape is by nature a violating disposition upon a seperate agent which also increases the gene pool and thus allows for mutation, a male who constantly rapes other are better equipped to pass their offspring on, when compared to a morally sane person. 

And the biggest issue - even if religion is advantageous, how does this tie to its truth? 

Science is replacing religion in almost every aspect.

Feeding millions.

Curing millions.

Giving hope to millions.

Answering questions that baffled mankind which religion was unable to solve.

Science can't make you stop fearing death. Science can't drag you out of the blackpill. Science can't make you a moral person.

Science is not a replacement for god(s).

The mere fact that it is illegal to rape someone and it comes with decades of incarceration could infact change things. 

Science makes you understand death so you don’t have to fear it.

Medical science and medication can drag you out of dark worlds.

Science can teach you how complex life  is and help you to respect life.

Science reduces the reliance on mythical gods and puts you in the hands of professional and qualified doctors and shrinks.

Do you understand how evolution via natural selection works? Those who are aggressive survive, and as rape is by nature a violating disposition upon a seperate agent which also increases the gene pool and thus allows for mutation, a male who constantly rapes other are better equipped to pass their offspring on, when compared to a morally sane person. 

Aggression is part of evolutionary success, but not all aggression is desirable. This is an instance wherein aggression isn't desirable. It pollutes the genepool with undesirable genetics. It makes tribes/groups weaker in the long-run. Yes, the individual organism gets to pass on genetics, but it makes it more likely that the genetic lineage will end if you don't select for desirable genetics.

And the biggest issue - even if religion is advantageous, how does this tie to its truth? 

It's not an issue at all for this thread. This thread is specifically about whether religion is evolutionary advantageous, not whether there is any truth to it. I even wrote the opening sentence to address this: "Functionally, regardless of whether the religion in question is true, it will solve issues that humans face."

No, what will happen is that the tribe is, as a population, bred to be more aggressive and hence be able to survive. This is not simply about the individual survival, it is about how, if enacted, rape furthers the evolutionary success of a population, at least in the instance we are discussing. 

And the biggest issue - even if religion is advantageous, how does this tie to its truth? 

It's not an issue at all for this thread. This thread is specifically about whether religion is evolutionary advantageous, not whether there is any truth to it. I even wrote the opening sentence to address this: "Functionally, regardless of whether the religion in question is true, it will solve issues that humans face."

It's clearly implied what you are getting at - I would wager that you are religious, are you not? Further, as a society, we ought to pursue truth over falsehood, so I think neglecting the truth element is detrimental. 

If a group has 30 selfless individuals unafraid of death and willing to die for their God, they have an advantage over tribes in warfare who do fear death

I'm glad you threw a funny hat into the air.

Tribes that were indifferent to rape would have a mixbag of genes.

Tribes that were against rape would have women select for favorable genes.

Over time, the selection of favorable genes will result in healthier, smarter and genetically fitter people.

This rape mentality fails the rapists in the long run, even if not immediately, because their bad genes aren't filtered out via female selection.

But the proof is in the pudding anyway: we have intense feelings against rape; evolution has already selected against rapists. You're arguing against what is already established as fact.

I didn't say I was a graduate. I'm literally studying this right now.

Tribes that were indifferent to rape would have a mixbag of genes.

That's a good thing. It's called genetic diversity.

Tribes that were against rape would have women select for favorable genes.

Once again, women don't select for genes, they select for attraction (which can correlate with genetic fitness but not reliably)

Over time, the selection of favorable genes will result in healthier, smarter and genetically fitter people.

Evolution doesn't select (directly) for intelligence or (after reproduction) even health. It selects for having the most offspring survive to have more offspring. That's why only 200 years ago people lived to 40 and had 7 kids on average.

Evolution isn't capable of foresight. It works one generation at a time. So whatever has an evolutionary advantage in one generation will be promoted in the next, regardless of what's best in the long run. So once again, yes, rape has an evolutionary advantage as a reproductive strategy, similar to how to competing reproductive strategies exist for male cuttlefish. [1] And rape exists in other species, not just humans, though scientists like to call is sexual coercion instead. If there were an evolutionary advantage to use a different reproductive strategy, then rape would have ceased to exist.

Once again, anything with an evolutionary disadvantage doesn't stick around. The fact that rape has existed for all of recorded history and is shared by our closest relative, the chimpanzee, indicates that some amount of rape is able to meet a Nash equilibrium on reproductive fitness.

See the title of the OP is really  starting to annoy me now. 

Ha, thats good hey ?  Dyslix.  

No but Avery . What do you think the strongest post or point you or someone else has put foward to " oppose " it. ?

Anddddd. 

Can i get your guess on .

Religion,  how much percent good has it done for us  as to not good. 

I was going to be real generous and say . 

Religion has done us at least 75% bad  to  25 % good. 

Thats like MEGA generous from me i feel.

Actually 

78 % bad to 22% 

Yep.

Collectivism is a good species survival strategy.

Ideology is an evolutionary development thereof.

Deism and religious development were an evolutionary inevitability of an intellectual specialist.

Unless, of course, the other tribe has 1000's of warriors

Religion is an evolutionary advantage. 

Who could one possible put this statement  before apart from a religious forum ?    

Unless, of course, the other tribe has 1000's of warriors

I don't think anybody will dispute that more than one type of advantage can exist, and that some advantages are better than others