so i can't have "objective morality" and also KNOW WHAT THE RULES ARE ?That’s not the same as calling the rules impractical, that judgement call is based off knowing.
"objective morality" doesn't have any room for "judgement calls"
i want to know what is right and what is wrong
"objective morality" doesn't have any room for "judgement calls"
Romans 13:1-2 says: "Obey the government, for God is the One who has put it there. There is no government anywhere that God has not placed in power. So those who refuse to obey the law of the land are refusing to obey God, and punishment will follow."
"objective morality" doesn't have any room for "judgement calls"You either know or you don’t.
"judgement calls" ARE BY DEFINITION SUBJECTIVE
(of a person or their judgment) not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts.
Keyword JUDGEMENT.
No, they’re both demonstrating objectivity hence why in the definition it said (of a person or their judgment) meaning you can judge objectively but you can’t do it without a keyword mind, which is exactly what God did when He defined morality
Morality is not a part of existent reality. You cannot point to it, you cannot actualize it, you cannot demonstrate it.
Morality is not a part of existent reality. You cannot point to itWe learned this in third grade.
how do you "objectively" measure morality ?With a moral compass.where can i buy one of these
and where can i get it calibrated ?
Only things you can point at exist?
Only things you can point at exist?
Keyword JUDGEMENT.you should never have to make a personal judgement about "objective morality"
in the exact same way you should never have to make a personal judgement about mathematicseveryone should be able to "do the math" and see the exact same answer
Only things you can point at exist?Yes, if you cannot point to it in theory, it does not exist. This follows from the definition of “exist”.Since you cherry picked that one part to disagree with, should I take that to mean that you agree with the rest of the post on what objectivity and subjectivity actually mean?
in the exact same way you should never have to make a personal judgement about mathematicseveryone should be able to "do the math" and see the exact same answerWhat's the square root of 4. Is two the exact same answer as negative two?Is non-Euclidean Geometry the exact same thing as Euclidean Geometry?
Only things you can point at exist?it's the difference between CONCRETE NOUNS and ABSTRACT NOUNS
in the exact same way you should never have to make a personal judgement about mathematicseveryone should be able to "do the math" and see the exact same answerWhat's the square root of 4. Is two the exact same answer as negative two?Is non-Euclidean Geometry the exact same thing as Euclidean Geometry?(IFF) you agree on the AXIOMS of mathematics (THEN) you can agree on the results of any specific mathematical calculation(IFF) you agree on the AXIOMS of morality (THEN) you can agree on the results of any specific moral calculation
Since you cherry picked from my post, can I assume you agree that you are thinking on a thrid grade level?
How do you measure exist, do you have an exist-o-meter
--> @3RU7ALHow do you measure exist, do you have an exist-o-meter
Since you cherry picked from my post, can I assume you agree that you are thinking on a thrid grade level?Let me know when you have something intelligent to say.
Just because logic and reason don't exist for you, doesn't mean they don't exist for the rest of us.
Just because logic and reason don't exist for you, doesn't mean they don't exist for the rest of us.there is a clear and important difference between IDEAS and OBJECTS
IDEAS don't "exist" in the same way that OBJECTS "exist"
dragons and unicorns don't "exist" in the same way that cattle "exist"
there is a clear and important difference between IDEAS and OBJECTSNo shit.IDEAS don't "exist" in the same way that OBJECTS "exist"No shit again.dragons and unicorns don't "exist" in the same way that cattle "exist"Once again, maybe ideas don't exist for you, but they do for the rest of us.
there is a clear and important difference between IDEAS and OBJECTSNo shit.IDEAS don't "exist" in the same way that OBJECTS "exist"No shit again.dragons and unicorns don't "exist" in the same way that cattle "exist"Once again, maybe ideas don't exist for you, but they do for the rest of us.cattle can be empirically measured and are therefore FACTUALdragons and unicorns can NOT be empirically measured and are therefore NOT FACTUAL
what is the OBJECTIVE that "morality" leads to ?
Objectivity isn’t referring to the judging of anything
The earth’s existence, and the shape it exists within, does not require and is not dependent on a mind.
You cannot point to it, you cannot actualize it, you cannot demonstrate it. Morality, even your conception of it, is entirely the product of a mind.
So you agree with the rest of us that your ideas are NOT FACTUAL.
