Why are so many resilient to fact-based truth regarding black criminality?

To date I have been permanently suspended from Instagram, Facebook and Twitter directly (and very specifically) due to posting fact-based truth

• Probably not the most persuasive way to start an argument.
  
• Color me skeptical about mere posting of fact getting you banned but I won't claim to have contradicting evidence.

half of the roughly 6% of black male population in the US do in fact commit over 50% of the entire nation's murders 

Reading comprehension matters.

You only repeated what I said.

"half of the roughly 6% of black male population in the US do in fact commit over 50% of the entire nation's murders"

• Color me skeptical about mere posting of fact getting you banned but I won't claim to have contradicting evidence.
  

To date I have been permanently suspended from Instagram, Facebook and Twitter directly (and very specifically) due to posting fact-based truth backed by criminological (and other scientific) data that clearly demonstrates that black Americans, namely half of the roughly 6% of black male population in the US do in fact commit over 50% of the entire nation's murders and non-negligent manslaughters; and that they are also disproportionately represented among other violent crimes like robberies and rapes.

-->@oromagi

• Color me skeptical about mere posting of fact getting you banned but I won't claim to have contradicting evidence.
  

Google fired James Damore for a controversial gender memo

• But millions of users on Facebook and Twitter re-posted "Google’s Ideological Echo Chamber" and none were banned for it.  
  
• So clearly, social media users are held to a different, lower standard than employees
  
• Here's that memo:
  
• https://web.archive.org/web/20170809220001/https://diversitymemo-static.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/Googles-Ideological-Echo-Chamber.pdf
  
• Damore had signed an employment contract agreeing to refrain from discriminatory language at work.  Based on his published point of view, he should not have signed a legal contract promising not to express a point of view that he held so deeply.  To renege on that agreement after profiting by it is Damore's bad conduct at the heart of the affair.
  
• Damore now says he regrets certain provocative claims in the memo and blames his autism for writing it.
  
• Damore wrote the memo coming off a corporate diversity training program. 
  
• Having experienced a few of those programs myself, I must confess some empathy for Damore's response.
  
• Nothing makes one want to do shit quite like being told not to ever do that shit over and over again for a week.
  
• Damore's memo came to light when it was published on Google's internal bulletin board.  Google never censored the memo or took it down.
  
• Google's VP of Diversity did publish a counter-argument that came down on Damore's opinion like a ton of bricks
  
• But Damore wasn't fired for weeks.
  
• Problem was, as Damore become a national figure claiming that many of his co-workers were biologically unsuited for the jobs they were doing, those co-workers understandably refused to work on his team, particularly where his bias might impact their prospects.  Pretty quickly, no team or projects wanted him and he became an active drag on company cohesion, image, profitability.
  
• Look, if an assistant manager at the McDonald's weekly staff meeting stated that blacks ought not to  work the drive thru window because The Bell Curve claims they have lower IQ, most would agree that's an offense that merits termination.
  
• Similarly, Damore  publicly stated that one group couldn't do a particular job due to biological limitations, citing similarly flimsy research and similarly merited termination.
  
• The National Labor Relations board reviewed Damore's case and found his termination well-justified.
  
• Damore brought a lawsuit alleging discrimination against Whites and Asians at a company that's 90% White and Asian, but that went nowhere.
  
• Having worked as a Systems Analyst for HP, Oracle, etc  I will testify that IT projects without women on them tend to stagnate, devolve into internecine power struggles and lack the sense of community that makes work fun.
  
• Kind of like this website, come to think of it.
  

"Of course, I may be biased and only see evidence that supports my viewpoint. In terms of political biases, I consider myself a classical liberal and strongly value individualism and reason. I'd be very happy to discuss any of the document further and provide more citations."

it is the conclusions

banned for differences of opinion

It could be OP was banned for good reason.

data that clearly demonstrates that black Americans

So... assuming that "Blacks are responsible for more than their fair share of all US murders" is one premise in an argument, what is your conclusion?

guilty until proven innocent

have you considered running those same statistics specifically for "economic status" ?

That cuts both ways. OP and those who banned him are both innocent until proven guilty. It is fair to say we do not know if OP's ban from multiple sites was justified or not. 

-->@oromagi

exactly which part of this document do you disagree with ?

As far as this subject goes, I'll read as conceded (since you made no reply) your point that James Damore's termination should reduce my skepticism about whether users get banned from social media only for reprinting FBI stats.

exactly like a trial, let's focus on the individual who stands accused

Okay. Being banned from multiple distinct sites is sufficient to suspect the individual is the problem and not the sites. The individual is the common denominator. Without specifics, that probably the best we can do.