Why do you rely largely upon Fuller for your inspiration and ideas?
Why not be inspired by Fullers ideas?
Fuller 1st book 4D or 2nd book Time Lock
LINK or Nine Chains to the Moon, mention Einstein, and the publishers would not publish it since Fuller mentions the great mans name in the book. So in Fullers last book,--Cosmography-- he recounts the story of how he told publishers to ask Einstein what he thinks of the book. So Einstein asks to meet with Fuller and Fuller recounts this meeting and what was said.
I was a child of the space-age, and I will always remmeber my laying out at night, in a field with my two best buddies, ---maybe were 10 or 11 years old--- and were looking at the stars, and I think, maybe our Universe, is inside the body of another person, and that person is inside a universe that is inside another persons body, so on and so on.
My one friend turns to me and asks, why are you thinking stuff like that ? I dont recall my answer, or if I did answer.
Fuller was a cosmic thinker, and I very much like that. Also, his approach was based in geometry and I very much like that.
The coupler is an asymetrical octahedron. And in Jim Lehmans matrix, he commensurates in close-packing filling of all space, via the 5-fold icosahedron{ 20 regular triangles } with the 4-fold irregular rhomb-cubo-octahedron via and irregular octahedron that has four trapazoids. For me, I see trapazoids function in UNiverse as intermediators of shapes, and the octahedron in general as a mediator between 5-fold and 4-fold geometries.
However, there are no trapzoids on surface of the Coupler. Here is
LINK to more info on Coupler. And why I believe Coupler is the fundamental space, can be better understood via this vid
LINK IS Charge Fundamental?
COUPLER 8 triangle surface faces
16 A quanta modules
8 B quanta modules
24 is total count of quanta modules
954.01 ..." The Coupler has one of the most profound
integral functionings in
metaphysical Universe, and probably so in physical Universe,
because its integral
complexities consist entirely of integral rearrangeability
within the same space of the same
plus and/or minus Mites. "...
See isopin and hypercharge in above link, Is Charge Fundamental
