How would you have responded to Matt's question of what do you define as a women? From my perspective, it seems that you are defining gender as broadly as you can, so that anyone can morph into, or in your terms, discover their gender. Do you not think that a term such as "sex", of which is grounded in biology, is more stable?
Nope, because gender is grounded in biology as well - your mind is as biologic as your junk, thats something that needs to be expressed very clearly. What being a woman is, is how you experience it, it seems to me like you are trying to needlessly narrow it. But I always priortize the brain to the junk, sorry buddy.
I don't think a successful transition indicates anything regarding the empirical status of a being. What do you think of trans-speciesism? Does not your stance allow for the switching of species? Mere thought does not, in my opinion, have the weight to alter biology.
You have no idea what your talking about friend - and I mean this in the nicest way possible - you have utterly ignored my entire argument if this is the level of feedback Im getting this won't happen anymore cuz you aren't reading my responses. I said that this is a discovery, which does not imply change. You have misunderstood as a very fundamental level.
Furthermore, again sex and gender are different, this is why its important - just like sex describes phenotypical features, species does too, i have never claimed that being transgender changes your sex - I have said that you discover your gender does not match and ought to be priortized. Trans-specieism is not an apt comparison to transgender "ism" for that very reason.
This is a false equivalence. Phobias and other anxiety disorders are caused by some type of dysfunction in the amygdala and related brain areas. Trans activists do not believe there is anything dysfunctional about transgendered people. Moreover, when someone switches their gender, there is no inspection on whether there are any biological ties to the reason they believe they are the opposite gender. If you have a phobia, there is a quantifiable and understandable reason for your reaction.
You have utterly missed the point of the analogy. I am a trans activist, once again "switched" is the wrong verb here, you have truly learned nothing. But I'll explain this before ending the conversation. The point of the analogy was to point out how it depends on individual experience and how what seems irrational or unintuitive for one person is not for another. I would reccomend trying to look a bit deeper.