Not really gonna discuss my irl details here.
I will like to point out 2 things first, before I indirectly answer your question:
- This is 1-man-team situation, the President can unofficially assign helpers, that's up to them. This isn't a team manager role.
- Not only is it not a team-manager role, the role is actually positioned to be fundamentally defiant to the team manager (chief moderator) and hold them accountable on behalf of those in the userbase that would be easiest to neglect (the recently banned and/or soon to be banned)
I am much better suited than Wylted is for number 2, for a variety of reasons. Wylted jumps from opposer to supporter whenever it suits his selfish agenda whereas I oppose mods based on the reasoning behind their inaction and action (always have, always will). Where you see shifts in me isn't just when I get banned, that's anger, where I really properly resent a mod (like David) is when I notice a lot of double standard BS going on.
~~~~~
Now, to answer your question without revealing too much
I would say that I tend to be the type of person who leads when it's needed and follows when it's demanded. When neither the need nor the demand is there I'm very much a 'do my own thing and do it well' type of guy in a team.
If you're looking for me to say I have a lot of real-life experience being 'the leader' no, I don't have massive amounts. I'm the type that even when I lead, I prefer to train and have a 2nd in command to help overlook the team with me (especially if they're an assertive personality that's gonna be a pain in my ass if I keep trying to lead solo). I'm happy to play ball with other types who want to assert themselves, but I am by no means someone who 'follows' or is weak at leading.
My style of leading is about getting the job done at a decent pace. If there's a task at hand, I neither aim to be the most charismatic leader on the planet nor the meanest and harshest. Why don't I aim for the latter? Because if you rush people, creating an atmosphere of sheer anxiety and fear, you may in the short-term end up with productive workers but they're all disloyal, ready to talk shit about you to your own boss and/or others and really have low morale (which matters if you're going to be leading them over several projects).
So, how would I be as President? I'd know my role, accept that the mods are technically above me, play ball and understand when and when not to assert myself and have all the nuance Wylted says I don't. However, if true injustice occurs, it is my duty as President to challenge it. I am the userbase's last hope in such scenarios.