transgender research is biased

Author: Wylted

Posts

Total: 9
Topic's author
#1
Wylted
Wylted's avatar
Debates: 34
Posts: 5,754
3
4
11
Wylted's avatar
Wylted
3
4
11
David reiner, had his dick cut off and was raised as a girl in order to prove sex is a social construct and reassignment surgery a good thing. The doctor who made him a girl, considered the surgery a success. 

All this pro transgender shit is basically the same. Some commie doctor who is after whatever conclusion they can get to feminine western men. https://youtu.be/SLFGMWoQaCU
#2
Discipulus_Didicit
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 5,758
3
4
10
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Discipulus_Didicit
3
4
10
You seem to be saying:

P1: The decision to raise David Reimer as a female was fucked up.
P2: The decision to raise David Reimer as a female was part of an experiment to "prove sex is a social construct".
C: Transgender research is fucked up.

Topic's author
#3
Wylted
Wylted's avatar
Debates: 34
Posts: 5,754
3
4
11
Wylted's avatar
Wylted
3
4
11
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
the doctor concluded the research as successfully proving that reassignment surgery is fine, despite the negative effectsnin Reimer's life
#4
Discipulus_Didicit
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 5,758
3
4
10
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Discipulus_Didicit
3
4
10
-->
@Wylted
What does the term "successful surgery" mean?
Topic's author
#5
Wylted
Wylted's avatar
Debates: 34
Posts: 5,754
3
4
11
Wylted's avatar
Wylted
3
4
11
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
in this case he was saying the individual was happy about the results etc.
#6
Theweakeredge
Theweakeredge's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 3,457
4
7
10
Theweakeredge's avatar
Theweakeredge
4
7
10
-->
@Wylted
You have.... a blog post, that's all there is that actually sources your argument. You have a single blog post covering a book, by one individual who... couldn't scientifically use any results there in any kind of study, and commited child abuse. Because the person in question was not IN control of that surgery, and was too young to recieve it - actual transgender research regarding surgery only has subjects that are 18 and older... as before you have this surgery you have to take hormones, which typically isn't given to people until they are 16 at youngest. 

So... have fun with an anecdote which doesn't actually represent the thing you're talking about. Seems pretty consistent for your claims. 
Topic's author
#7
Wylted
Wylted's avatar
Debates: 34
Posts: 5,754
3
4
11
Wylted's avatar
Wylted
3
4
11
Weaker edge

there is a recent American show that followed the story of a 12 year old that got his penis cut off at the urging of his fame where mother
#8
Discipulus_Didicit
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 5,758
3
4
10
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Discipulus_Didicit
3
4
10
-->
@Wylted
in this case he was saying the individual was happy about the results etc.
Citation?
#9
Nyxified
Nyxified's avatar
Debates: 21
Posts: 224
2
3
9
Nyxified's avatar
Nyxified
2
3
9
-->
@Wylted
With regards to David Reimer:

  • An individual who had at best a 2% chance of being transgender was forcibly given sex reassignment surgery
  • This was a bad thing because their gender identity evidently didn't change, they were experiencing suicidal thoughts and depression, and by 14 years old started to identify as a man.
  • They committed suicide.
  • Thus, forcing people to be a sex that doesn't align with their gender causes mental health problems and is a bad thing.

He wasn't 'happy' with it when he literally experienced severe depression culminating in his suicide and also he took on a male identity later in life.

And this is somehow evidence to you that trans research is biased?