better formatting
I think Buddamooseis scum. All of his analysis seems contrived. He also seems like hewould rather insult people’s logic (using logical fallacies to doso) rather than scum hunt.
“This actuallydoes not provide a reason for why, a self proclaimed narcissist,would cede control of a DP, amd bw onto a wagon based upon reasoningyou were explicit and clear that you didn't agree with.”
In this postbuddamoose pretends as if he doesn’t realize that you can disagreewith somebody’s strategy of targeting experienced players first,without criticizing their choice of who to target. I might thinkBuddamoose is good to target for reasons not pertaining toexperience, but he pretends as if that is impossible.
“ Then youare pretty much admitting you pulled that reasoning out of ur rear?Cause, to get this straight, GP is not sus for bw'ing because becausehe idolizes you so that explains why, but him idolizing you actuallyisnt going to generally cause a bw. “
In this postbuddamoose pretends as if he doesn’t realize somebody can have ahigher than normal chance of band wagoning me and still not be amindless ape. He acts like he doesn’t understand the role influenceplays and is insinuating the only two options are mindless ape orsomeebody who is a completely independent thinker. This is not badlogic on budda’s part this is all contrived. If it wasn’t thanatleast one thing he says would point to genuine scum hunting asopposed to just questioning the logic of others and making contrivedstatements based on obviously faulty logic.
“s i said, if youare forming a gameplan in say football, you don't form a gameplanaround attacking the cornerback that's a veteran and is considered aformidable corner, you go after the rookie, it simply put generatessuccess far more often than going after that veteran who has seen itall before. “
This is ridiculous,besides the obvious reason that we don’t actually know who theopposing team is, it could be us attacking the rookie on our team, itjust isn’t necessarily true of good strategy. Sometimes you attackthe strong corner because you have the best receiver in the league,and the rookie corner is also guarding a rookie. Or maybe the otherteam is playing Man with one corner but using the zone defense on theother side of the field which is tough to throw against particularlyif your quarterback is a rookie.
“2 wagons with 1vote each during RVS, does not derail a game by a third person going,"neither of you two are pressuring smartly" and voting adifferent person. In fact, that is fmpov what a townie would do. Why?The goal of town is for town to control the direction of DP's. On DP1one doesn't know who is or is not town, so if you see people placingvotes you disagree with, as town you attempt to assert control anddrive it in a direction you agree with because the only player oneknows is conclusively town or strong town during RVS, is ones”
More obviouslycontrived logic. During RVS in most games you have about 5 differentwagons in the beginning because most people in the town pile are lowIQ individuals. Unless you have a town read on somebody it is betterto go after an already established target to begin generating readsthan form a new wagon that is entirely useless. We need to supporteach other unless we have a town read on somebody that is beingtargeted, otherwise the game won’t progree. Budda knows this thoughand is just intentially and knowingly using stupid logic.
“On a final note,if the purpose of your pressure was to get me to produce content togauge affiliation, congrats, the content has been produced. So whereis your read. If you haven't been able to gauge it yet, howschocking, it's almost as if its harder to gauge experienced playersaffiliation. “
Your cockiness isastounding, you suck at mafia which is why we already have a scumread on you. Instead of using contrived logic, you should have beenusing good logic. You are easy to see through.
'”m just sayingdude, it's becoming pretty obvious your letting him bw'ing you affecthow your viewing his behavior. I get it, you don't want to FoSsomeone who bw'd you because then they'll usually stop bw'ing you.But he's gonna stop anyways because he never agreed with your wagonto begin with. So once another wagon gains comparable steam, he'sgonna abandon voting with you anyways, whether or not his motive isto generate a wagon ASAP, which doesn't make sense as a motiveanyways.”
Obviously bad andcontrived logic. Yes you should build wagons early and support onesthat you might not prefer if that is what it takes to build them. Iwant to generate reads fast and progress the game at a very rapidpace.
“Faking posts isntindicative of affiliation... and it's not risky... okay bud.”
It’s usuallyindicative of affiliation, unless it’s me. You should also be scumreading warren. I don’t know why he thinks a bunch of people whohave played a lot of games with him, would believe he was a noob.This is more contrived bad logic on your part.
