black people are genetically superior

Author: n8nrgmi

Posts

Total: 26
Topic's author
#1
n8nrgmi
n8nrgmi's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,499
3
2
3
n8nrgmi's avatar
n8nrgmi
3
2
3
they are superior due to the laws of political correctness.  you can't say that their smaller brains and lower IQ and test scores makes them less intelligent. but you can say that they have superior athletic ability. thus, they are equally smart, but physically advantaged... making them genetically superior. 

here's some science that points to them being able to run better, and such. 

then again, maybe it might be permissible politically to say asians with their bigger brains and better test scores, are smarter. just as long as we're not contrasting blacks with whites in a negative way, then maybe there's more leeway than i might expect. 
#2
Theweakeredge
Theweakeredge's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 3,457
4
7
10
Theweakeredge's avatar
Theweakeredge
4
7
10
-->
@n8nrgmi
Except... it's not a study, its an article... by people who are theorizing things - furthermore - it even acknolwedges that it might just be a "cultural thing".... you have no idea what you're talking about... again. What happened to the actual research?
#3
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 172
Posts: 3,946
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
-->
@n8nrgmi
You obviously can't say they are better, or worse.

Even if Black people really are good at running, they probably aren't better at other things. You wouldn't call an athlete "greater" than, say, a programmer.
#4
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,084
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@n8nrgmi
Superiority, might be defined by success or longevity or strength or speed.

Or who can eat the most burgers in ten minutes.
Topic's author
#5
n8nrgmi
n8nrgmi's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,499
3
2
3
n8nrgmi's avatar
n8nrgmi
3
2
3
-->
@Theweakeredge
"Except... it's not a study, its an article... by people who are theorizing things - furthermore - it even acknolwedges that it might just be a "cultural thing".... you have no idea what you're talking about... again. What happened to the actual research?"

it might not be peer reviewed science articles, but the article i posted is a credible source. 

where does the article say it might be a cultural thing? even if it might be more cultural, there are objective differences between the races that give advantage or disadvantage in athletics. it pretty much has to be partially physical racial characteristics makes a difference, too. but you lack the critical thinking skills needed to acknowledge the truth, as usual. 
Topic's author
#6
n8nrgmi
n8nrgmi's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,499
3
2
3
n8nrgmi's avatar
n8nrgmi
3
2
3
-->
@Intelligence_06
"Even if Black people really are good at running, they probably aren't better at other things. You wouldn't call an athlete "greater" than, say, a programmer."

it's not politically correct to say blacks are ever inferior at certain things, thus, by the laws of political correctness, they are genetically superior given it's permissible to say they are superior at certain things. 
#7
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,084
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@n8nrgmi
What depth of skin tone defines black?

And most reasonably fit people can run.

But who can eat the most pies?

The law of political correctness, says that it is unfair to call superior pies eaters, fat bastards.

Just saying.
#8
Wylted
Wylted's avatar
Debates: 34
Posts: 5,754
3
4
11
Wylted's avatar
Wylted
3
4
11
-->
@n8nrgmi
it's not politically correct to say blacks are ever inferior at certain things, thus, by the laws of political correctness, they are genetically superior given it's permissible to say they are superior at certain things. 
It's not politically correct either. Speculation of physical superiority is often about showing that blacks are apes like. Humans are naturally at a disadvantage with apes physically, because apes are more animal than man.

Not to mention superiority claims are often based on whites claiming that weak blacks were bred out for slave owners to have better slaves.

So it wouldn't be PC to claim blacks are more athletic (code for animal like).
#9
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,043
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@n8nrgmi
You're also taking extreme examples. The vast majority of people with dark skin won't ever qualify for the NBA.
#10
Theweakeredge
Theweakeredge's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 3,457
4
7
10
Theweakeredge's avatar
Theweakeredge
4
7
10
-->
@n8nrgmi
Um... no? It's about scientists hypothesizing without actually delivering any experimentation to TEST the theory out, this is exactly where psuedoscience comes from... ordinary people taking scientists hypothesis and presuming it to be correct without any further demonstration. 

Additionally, the sample size for their "observation" is incredibly limited, ironic how they don't consult other sports that require the same muscles in different regions huh? Kinda fun how they haven't factored in geographical socieconomic factor, again, this is why we need studies - there are too many variables to take an explanation and assume it is correct because it is possible - regardless of how "credible" your source is, without valid content, this specific article is baseless. 
Topic's author
#11
n8nrgmi
n8nrgmi's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,499
3
2
3
n8nrgmi's avatar
n8nrgmi
3
2
3
-->
@Theweakeredge
the findings in my article were published in a journal. you just dont like the results. i have evidence, all you have is speculation that it's incomplete evidence. it showed in the sample (from a bunch of different countries) that was published in a journal that blacks had longer legs and shorter torsos, and that even when the blacks were dispersed around the globe, the fastest ones could usually trace their lineage to west africa. i have the point that olympic athletes push themselves to their maximum, yet it's overwhelmingly blacks who dominate in running. which would reasonably lead one to believe there's physical differences if everyone is pushing themselves to their maximum. i could cite other evidence such as showing that blacks have more lean muscle mass and other evidence, but it's not needed to make the point. 
again, i have good, credible evidence. all you have is speculation and skepticism. it's fair to make conclusions about the world without every conclusions being in a comprehensive peer reviewed study. it's called common sense. of which you apparently have very little.
#12
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,043
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@n8nrgmi
Why do you even care? A fast person isn't going to feed himself any better than a slow person with dark skin in a civilized economy.
Topic's author
#13
n8nrgmi
n8nrgmi's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,499
3
2
3
n8nrgmi's avatar
n8nrgmi
3
2
3
-->
@Greyparrot
he got me on a tangent that it's fair to say the races have physical differences, that's all. my overall point still stands, that given political correctness it's arguably fair to say blacks are superior. that point of mine is only made for the purposes of irony, which i assumed was implied to the reader. 
#14
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,043
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@n8nrgmi
But you are absolutely wrong about skin color. Most people with dark skin are mutts with DNA from all over the globe.
Topic's author
#15
n8nrgmi
n8nrgmi's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,499
3
2
3
n8nrgmi's avatar
n8nrgmi
3
2
3
-->
@Greyparrot
which is why the study is looking at those that trace their lineage to west africa. when we're comparing the history of three branches of human evolution, africa, europe, and asia, we should reasonably expect to find differences. 
#16
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,043
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@n8nrgmi
So what? it's not like you can tell who has west african dna without a dna test. What's the point?

There's plenty of people with significant amounts of west African DNA that don't look anywhere close to black. Not to mention everyone is a mutt and there are no pure west african races left on the planet. 

Do you think society should mandate DNA tests at birth and arbitrarily lump the people into tribes against their will?

Sounds pretty fucked up.

It's neither the DNA nor the skin color that is the cause of Nigerian Immigrants earning far above the median household income in America.

Culture is far, far more important to a person's prosperity in a civilized society than ANY genetic phenotype.

So why do you care about something so trivial?
Topic's author
#17
n8nrgmi
n8nrgmi's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,499
3
2
3
n8nrgmi's avatar
n8nrgmi
3
2
3
-->
@Greyparrot
u r making too many irrelevant points to reasonably keep track of. there are physical differences among the races, when the races are at their purest. that's the only point i'm making. some people show more purity in their DNA that those physical differences manifest themselves. sometimes those differences make them better or worse at some things. the fact that most people are mutts is irrelevant to the core message here. 
#18
Theweakeredge
Theweakeredge's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 3,457
4
7
10
Theweakeredge's avatar
Theweakeredge
4
7
10
-->
@n8nrgmi
Incorrect: they were published in a blog section, furthermore, it was not a study... but an article, an opinion piece actually. Finally: you are aware that the results that said "vaccines causes autism" was also published in a journal? So even if you were right I wouldn't care, it is not a study, so your factually incorrect anyways, but even if you were it wouldn't be more convicning. Please double check your sources for now on, this one's buck!
#19
bmdrocks21
bmdrocks21's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 2,798
4
6
11
bmdrocks21's avatar
bmdrocks21
4
6
11
-->
@n8nrgmi
 you can't say that their smaller brains and lower IQ and test scores makes them less intelligent.
Never thought I'd see a race-realist lib lmao

which is why the study is looking at those that trace their lineage to west africa. when we're comparing the history of three branches of human evolution, africa, europe, and asia, we should reasonably expect to find differences. 

Naturally, yes. I feel like your account was hacked
Topic's author
#20
n8nrgmi
n8nrgmi's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,499
3
2
3
n8nrgmi's avatar
n8nrgmi
3
2
3
-->
@bmdrocks21
i'm a hard core moderate. not a lib. i do have a lib bias, but only cause reality has a lib bias. lolz. i get on my pedestal mostly about lib issues more often than not, but i have a lotta conservative views, even some strongly conservative views. 
#21
bmdrocks21
bmdrocks21's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 2,798
4
6
11
bmdrocks21's avatar
bmdrocks21
4
6
11
-->
@n8nrgmi
i'm a hard core moderate. not a lib. i do have a lib bias, but only cause reality has a lib bias. lolz. i get on my pedestal mostly about lib issues more often than not, but i have a lotta conservative views, even some strongly conservative views. 

Fair enough

What "strongly conservative views" do you have???
Topic's author
#22
n8nrgmi
n8nrgmi's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,499
3
2
3
n8nrgmi's avatar
n8nrgmi
3
2
3
-->
@bmdrocks21
we should limit abortion a lot. we should get spending under control. congress spends like a drunken sailor and that's not a good thing. i'm not woke i'm more like anti woke. i make lots of gay jokes and black jokes and all that. universal housing and child care is getting too socialistic. i'm more of a liberal on gun control but i think there's a human right to have a gun. free trade is generally a good thing. less regulation is a good thing. smaller government is better when possible. and local is better oriented to many issues. i agreed with trump on limiting food stamps and disability in the ways he was trimming them, given he wasn't taking an ax to those programs. gay marriage is a state issue. 
just some ideas off the top of my head. 
Topic's author
#23
n8nrgmi
n8nrgmi's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,499
3
2
3
n8nrgmi's avatar
n8nrgmi
3
2
3
-->
@bmdrocks21
i even have some radical conservative views but they're so radical i'm not sure i should even be mentioning them. no joke. 
#24
bmdrocks21
bmdrocks21's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 2,798
4
6
11
bmdrocks21's avatar
bmdrocks21
4
6
11
-->
@n8nrgmi
i even have some radical conservative views but they're so radical i'm not sure i should even be mentioning them. no joke. 

#MeToo. Real life is way worse lmao

i make lots of gay jokes and black jokes and all that
Oh, do tell
Topic's author
#25
n8nrgmi
n8nrgmi's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,499
3
2
3
n8nrgmi's avatar
n8nrgmi
3
2
3
-->
@bmdrocks21
how are women different than terrorists? you can negotiate with terrorists. 

not a gay joke but i suppose it could be called chauvinistic. 

i forgot but i also think trump was great on immigration. not perfect, but great. that one is pretty big. 
#26
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,629
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
For all you Extraterrestrials that are viewing this, we are showing you that Humans are nothing but big bugs in the Universe. Don't come here.