Why is the LDS considered a cult and not a proper Christian denomination?

Author: Timid8967

Posts

Total: 90
Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
-->
@Timid8967

So show us then.  don't just assert it, prove it.  
- I meant in practice, not in beliefs. LDS have some of the weirdest beliefs among Christian denominations. They follow Bible teachings in chastity, modesty, polygamy, family, gambling, intoxication...etc.

as the Brother would suggest "You may start now". 
- Which of you is the sock puppet?

BrotherDThomas
BrotherDThomas's avatar
Debates: 2
Posts: 2,140
3
3
7
BrotherDThomas's avatar
BrotherDThomas
3
3
7
-->
@Tradesecret


.
TRADESECRET, whose gender went from a man, to a woman, and now unknown, the Debate Runaway on Jesus' true MO,  Bible denier of Jesus being the Trinity God in the OT, the runaway to what division of Christianity he/she/unknown follows, the pseudo-christian that has committed the Unpardonable Sin, the number 1 Bible ignorant fool regarding Noah's ark, the pseudo-christian that says kids that curse their parents should be killed, states there is FICTION within the scriptures, and is guilty of Revelation 22:18-19 and 2 Timothy 4:3, an admitted sexual deviant, and had ungodly Gender Reassignment Surgery, Satanic Bible Rewriter, an embarrassed LIAR of their true gender,

YOUR LAUGHABLE QUOTE PUTTING THE CART BEFORE THE HORSE: "Are you going to answer the question or not? What is your definition of traditional Christianity? How can we properly analyse the two unless you give us some direction?  Begin"

Your irrational position takes place once again at your expense.  You forgot the "order of things" pertaining to your Bible stupidity, whereas YOU are to address my posts that precede your post in question in your quote above FIRST, get it? Obviously not Bible runaway fool!

Therefore, when YOU address ALL of your following runaway posts from me to you shown in the links below, then and only then will I address your questions to me. See how logic 101 works? Yes? Maybe, Bible runaway fool?


BEGIN!
 



Timid8967
Timid8967's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 459
2
2
2
Timid8967's avatar
Timid8967
2
2
2
-->
@Yassine
So show us then.  don't just assert it, prove it.  
- I meant in practice, not in beliefs. LDS have some of the weirdest beliefs among Christian denominations. They follow Bible teachings in chastity, modesty, polygamy, family, gambling, intoxication...etc.
what is that meant to mean to me? Muslims have weird practices as well.  Polygamy. violence.  pedophilia. domestic control and dominance. patriarchal practices. Arranged marriages.   bribery and corruption. none of these are biblical. biblical beliefs are dangerous. As are Christian beliefs.  both need to be mocked and ridiculed. I have suggested in other places what I think ought to be done with the bible.  Yet, it needs to be done in an ethical and honest manner.  Anyone can produce a strawman and kill it off.  Yet this is a dishonest manner of attacking something.  when the verdict is in - - then we can get to the judgment. 


as the Brother would suggest "You may start now". 
- Which of you is the sock puppet?
the Brother is obviously a sockpuppet.  
Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
-->
@Timid8967
what is that meant to mean to me? Muslims have weird practices as well. 
- No where near the extreme practices in the West; the most extreme in human history.

Polygamy.
- The West is the global leader in polygamous relationships & unlawful polygamy, aka adultery. In France, more than half married men & women commit adultery. 

violence.
- The West has lead the global output of violence every year for the past 1000 years. According to the Encyclopedia of War, the death toll is something around 550 million.

pedophilia.
- The West has been leading in that too, since ancient Greece.

domestic control and dominance.
- Some of the highest rates in the world of domestic abuse & incest are in the West, after all they invented it.

patriarchal practices.
- Lmao! Can you be more cliche!

Arranged marriages.
- The entire world prefers arranged marriages, except the West. They rather spend half their lives whoring themselves before marriage. Sad!

bribery and corruption.
- The West bribes & corrupts the entire world to maintain their control. 50 billion USD of American tax payer money went to bribe Iraq alone.

none of these are biblical. biblical beliefs are dangerous. As are Christian beliefs.  both need to be mocked and ridiculed. I have suggested in other places what I think ought to be done with the bible.  Yet, it needs to be done in an ethical and honest manner.  Anyone can produce a strawman and kill it off.  Yet this is a dishonest manner of attacking something.  when the verdict is in - - then we can get to the judgment. 
- This is hilariously delusional! You seem to be boasting a lot of confidence, maybe you can debate me on Islam. 



FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,596
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@Yassine
 LDS are actually closer to the teachings of the Bible than most Christian denominations out there.
Yes, Lori Vallow and Chad Daybell sure think so. That's why they killed her kids.
Timid8967
Timid8967's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 459
2
2
2
Timid8967's avatar
Timid8967
2
2
2
-->
@Yassine
what is that meant to mean to me? Muslims have weird practices as well. 
- No where near the extreme practices in the West; the most extreme in human history.
You should give some examples.   Not just make wild claims.  

Polygamy.
- The West is the global leader in polygamous relationships & unlawful polygamy, aka adultery. In France, more than half married men & women commit adultery. 
You speak with a forked tongue.  Polygamy is illegal in the West.  If it unlawful - then it is illegal. The only practicing polygamists I know are Muslims who try and get around the law by having one real marriage and other de-facto - Muslim weddings.   Hence, all polygamists are adulterers.  In any event, the same occurs in every culture.  People commit adultery.  


violence.
- The West has lead the global output of violence every year for the past 1000 years. According to the Encyclopedia of War, the death toll is something around 550 million.
Yes, so you say.  But the West do not behead people.   You seem to have missed China's mass cultural genocides. You seem to have missed Russia's mass murders. You seem to have missed Cambodia and places in the East.  Islam is a religion of violence. Cutting of a hand for theft is violence.  Beating your wife for disobedience or not submitting is violence.  

pedophilia.
- The West has been leading in that too, since ancient Greece.
Again, I never said the West did not have problems, but Islam has always had problems in this area. Your founder is one of history's most scary people who committed this evilness. 

domestic control and dominance.
- Some of the highest rates in the world of domestic abuse & incest are in the West, after all they invented it.
By pointing the finger - you have three pointing back at yourself.  The West did not invent these things. They were around a long time before the West came into existence.  

patriarchal practices.
- Lmao! Can you be more cliche!
The father is the head of the house.  Do you deny it? The eldest brother rules. Do you deny it? 


Arranged marriages.
- The entire world prefers arranged marriages, except the West. They rather spend half their lives whoring themselves before marriage. Sad!
Forcing people to marry other people - a breach of fundamental human rights.    Not permitting a freedom of choice in such an important decision. Incest - pedaphilia. Who prefers these things? Not the West. This is why we have laws against such things and why the community is so outraged against the Catholic church for its public role in such things. 


bribery and corruption.
- The West bribes & corrupts the entire world to maintain their control. 50 billion USD of American tax payer money went to bribe Iraq alone.
The West is based on contracts and a legal system which for the most part is transparent. Muslim nations, like Indonesia and  in the East conduct hearings based on a handshake, on bribe systems, on family self interest.  Americans will use bribes in Iraq because Iraq does not recognize anything else.  Yet if the Iraq went to America it would have to sign a contract.  


none of these are biblical. biblical beliefs are dangerous. As are Christian beliefs.  both need to be mocked and ridiculed. I have suggested in other places what I think ought to be done with the bible.  Yet, it needs to be done in an ethical and honest manner.  Anyone can produce a strawman and kill it off.  Yet this is a dishonest manner of attacking something.  when the verdict is in - - then we can get to the judgment. 
- This is hilariously delusional! You seem to be boasting a lot of confidence, maybe you can debate me on Islam. 
It would be difficult to conduct a debate with you because you are dishonest. And deny simple truths - replacing them with your own narrative. 
Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
-->
@Timid8967

You should give some examples.   Not just make wild claims. 
- I would have to write an encyclopedia, but this is a simple exercise. Take the practices of the Western society today & compare it to human society across history. Then realize there has never been a more extreme society in human history. 

You speak with a forked tongue.  Polygamy is illegal in the West.  If it unlawful - then it is illegal.
- Umm... You're contradicting yourself! Lawful polygamy is illegal & its opposite, unlawful polygamy, is illegal too...!! Solid logic!

The only practicing polygamists I know are Muslims who try and get around the law by having one real marriage and other de-facto - Muslim weddings.
- Yet, more contradictions! Muslims are the only polygamists by doing the same thing supposed non-polygamists do, having one legal relationship plus other extra-legal?! The law of non-contradiction is having a seizure.

Hence, all polygamists are adulterers.
- Even more contradictions! A polygamist in a legal marriage & in another relationship is committing extramarital intercourse (adultery), yet a polygamist in a legal marriage & an extra-legal one is also committing marital-extramarital intercourse!? Are you waging war on the law of non-contradiction...
 
In any event, the same occurs in every culture. People commit adultery.  
- "they do it too", right? Nah, wishful thinking. Adultery is particularly prevalent in western countries, they top the list like champions. Regardless, lawful (& unlawful) polygamous relationships are -respectively- consensual (& non-consensual) multi-partner relationships; the latter being predominant in western societies. One main difference between Islamic (lawful) polygamous relationships & western (unlawful) ones is that in the Islamic relationship all partners share equal rights & dues -& by extensions all the children, whereas in the West the relationship is non-consensual & one wife gets all the rights (& her children) when the other partners get no legal rights. 

Yes, so you say. But the West do not behead people.
- They just bomb them, burn them, dismember them, massacre them, shoot them, gas them, torture them, eat them... It's always shocking how westerners, especially Americans, are so detached from the world & their own history.

You seem to have missed China's mass cultural genocides. You seem to have missed Russia's mass murders. You seem to have missed Cambodia and places in the East.
- First of all, this is a drop in a bucket in Western killings, in both scale & scope. Second of all, these deaths are natively instigated, the Chinese will  quickly forget what Chinese have done to themselves, but they will never forget what others have done to them. This isn't the case for Western killings, others will not forget what the West has done to them. Third of all, it was not until these countries (particularly Japan) adopted Western ideologies (like Nationalist & Communism) that they displayed the grandest show of violence in their history.

Islam is a religion of violence.
- That's the typical attitude. Reminds me of when the French went into North Africa, they massacred a 1/3rd of the population, burning entire villages with their people, while calling their victims violent. You're projecting. Today, one of the most violent countries in the world is the US, they can't help projecting that blame onto others to feel better about themselves. 

Cutting of a hand for theft is violence.
- Killing off someone for murder is violence. Your logic is top notch. Execution or severing the hand for capital crime is a punishment, which is, by definition, cruel.

Beating your wife for disobedience or not submitting is violence.  
- You gotta get on top of that, it's getting out of control in the West. 

Again, I never said the West did not have problems, but Islam has always had problems in this area.
- You have wild imaginations. Many states in the US have no minimum age of marriage -there are +300k child marriages in country. In fact, less than a century ago, the age of consent in the US was 10 years, down to 7 years (such as in Delaware). 

Your founder is one of history's most scary people who committed this evilness. 
- The founder of Islam Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) was the greatest human being who brought justice & mercy to the world, to establish peace, honor women, end racism, spread freedom of religion & equity among all; & his wife Aisha is the most influential woman in Islam. You're conflating the great Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) with your bloody founders. 

By pointing the finger - you have three pointing back at yourself.  The West did not invent these things. They were around a long time before the West came into existence.  
- It's just that you don't know your history. Consensual marriage in the West comes from Islam, through Andalusia -thanks to Prophet Muhammed (pbuh). Pre-12th century, the Church did not establish consensual marriage, & that still persisted in the West until late 19th century. Divorce was also forbidden, subjecting women to essentially life-imprisonment. This didn't change until mid-20th century, after so much pressure from within to be like Muslims. Again, thanks to Prophet Muhammed (pbuh). Though, to be fair, the West is not the only culpable in this case, India as well. Women didn't have property rights in the West until the 20th century. In fact, in France it was until 1939. Muslim women had full property rights since day one, of course thanks to Prophet Muhammed (pbuh). I can go on & on & on...

The father is the head of the house.  Do you deny it? The eldest brother rules. Do you deny it? 
- No, God is the head of the family & of society in general. The man performs his role in society fulfilling his duties as a father, a husband, a son, a neighbor, an employee, a tenant, a friend...etc. Every connection a person has with another entails a role, with rights & dues. 

Forcing people to marry other people - a breach of fundamental human rights. Not permitting a freedom of choice in such an important decision.
- Damn! You don't know anything do you!? Arranged marriage = forced marriage. Though, forced marriages are prevalent in the US as well, most states do not prohibit it. 

Incest - pedaphilia. Who prefers these things? Not the West.
- Lmao! I guess you don't know. That's the general reputation the West has elsewhere. We can see the news; sex-tourism is dominated by westerners... You know the age of consent in Mexico is 12 years old... You can do the math.

This is why we have laws against such things and why the community is so outraged against the Catholic church for its public role in such things. 
- That's not true. Incest, zoophilia... are legal in much of the West. 

The West is based on contracts and a legal system which for the most part is transparent.
- That's propaganda. You keep forgetting I'm not American, this mantra means nothing to me. They keep telling you this day & night. It doesn't mean it's necessarily the case. Every state has PR.

Muslim nations, like Indonesia and  in the East conduct hearings based on a handshake, on bribe systems, on family self interest.
- America is a rich country, handshake bribes are not worth the risk. Bribes are in the millions & in the billions. Tax evasion in the US is upwards of ONE TRILLION USD per year. In the US corruption is legalized. A lawyer can lie under the protection of the Law & sell himself to the highest bidder. A corporation can lobby -corrupt- the government for its own interests. A pharmacologist can charge a small fortune to a low-class citizen for his profit... 

Americans will use bribes in Iraq because Iraq does not recognize anything else. Yet if the Iraq went to America it would have to sign a contract.
- You're hopelessly delusional. Can't you break a little bit the stereotype!? You have backwards, Western countries use aid & bribes & various other persuasive means -offers you can not refuse, to pressure countries to cede to their interests. They have been doing this since colonial days, it has never stopped. In fact, it was US official policy to ration African countries for population control, unless they cede to American demands, because these countries do not have other options. But the world is different today, there are options. China is rising as a super power. The balance is shifting.

It would be difficult to conduct a debate with you because you are dishonest. And deny simple truths - replacing them with your own narrative. 
- Did I shock you that much? You can't handle the truth?... In effect, if you're confident you have the truth, then you can just disprove my lies & establish your truths. Shouldn't be hard right?



Timid8967
Timid8967's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 459
2
2
2
Timid8967's avatar
Timid8967
2
2
2
-->
@Yassine

- I would have to write an encyclopedia, but this is a simple exercise. Take the practices of the Western society today & compare it to human society across history. Then realize there has never been a more extreme society in human history. 
So I guess that's a no then. You have none - not even one example and just make wild claims.  I was actually hoping you might have substance to your nonsense. 



- Umm... You're contradicting yourself! Lawful polygamy is illegal & its opposite, unlawful polygamy, is illegal too...!! Solid logic!
Sorry - not solid logic.  the word lawful means legal.  Polygamy is wrong in my opinion.  

- Yet, more contradictions! Muslims are the only polygamists by doing the same thing supposed non-polygamists do, having one legal relationship plus other extra-legal?! The law of non-contradiction is having a seizure.
That does not even make sense.  You seem to misunderstand the law of non-contradiction. However if you think that is what I have said - please express it so. 


- Even more contradictions! A polygamist in a legal marriage & in another relationship is committing extramarital intercourse (adultery), yet a polygamist in a legal marriage & an extra-legal one is also committing marital-extramarital intercourse!? Are you waging war on the law of non-contradiction...
 yassine - to have more than one wife is to commit adultery or unfaithfulness against the first wife.  


- "they do it too", right? Nah, wishful thinking. Adultery is particularly prevalent in western countries, they top the list like champions. Regardless, lawful (& unlawful) polygamous relationships are -respectively- consensual (& non-consensual) multi-partner relationships; the latter being predominant in western societies. One main difference between Islamic (lawful) polygamous relationships & western (unlawful) ones is that in the Islamic relationship all partners share equal rights & dues -& by extensions all the children, whereas in the West the relationship is non-consensual & one wife gets all the rights (& her children) when the other partners get no legal rights. 
Adultery is prevalent everywhere. You should speak to the Muslim families I know - where children dislike their father who has two separate families.  One of my closest friends left Indonesia to come to PNG - because her father favored her half siblings from his second wife.  



- They just bomb them, burn them, dismember them, massacre them, shoot them, gas them, torture them, eat them... It's always shocking how westerners, especially Americans, are so detached from the world & their own history.
Unlike you, I accept that the Muslim world has done bad things - but I also acknowledge the West has too.  You seem to think that the West deny their evils. You obviously don't know too many Westerners. Or if you do - you just reject their views.  I am not American.  



- First of all, this is a drop in a bucket in Western killings, in both scale & scope. Second of all, these deaths are natively instigated, the Chinese will  quickly forget what Chinese have done to themselves, but they will never forget what others have done to them. This isn't the case for Western killings, others will not forget what the West has done to them. Third of all, it was not until these countries (particularly Japan) adopted Western ideologies (like Nationalist & Communism) that they displayed the grandest show of violence in their history.
No it is not a drop in the bucket.  There were more people killed in the 20th century than in the rest of human history.  You need to read some more history - try reading something at all - would be nice. 


- That's the typical attitude. Reminds me of when the French went into North Africa, they massacred a 1/3rd of the population, burning entire villages with their people, while calling their victims violent. You're projecting. Today, one of the most violent countries in the world is the US, they can't help projecting that blame onto others to feel better about themselves. 
Islam is a religion of violence.  It advocates full submission or beheading by its fundamentalists. Fundamentalists who make up the majority of Islamists.  The minority which are nominal do not understand Islam  - like the majority of Christians who are also nominal do not understand their religion.  



- Killing off someone for murder is violence. Your logic is top notch. Execution or severing the hand for capital crime is a punishment, which is, by definition, cruel.
I think the better recourse would be to use what I call victim's rights. 

 
- You gotta get on top of that, it's getting out of control in the West. 
do you mean wives not submitting or being disobedient? 



- You have wild imaginations. Many states in the US have no minimum age of marriage -there are +300k child marriages in country. In fact, less than a century ago, the age of consent in the US was 10 years, down to 7 years (such as in Delaware). 
Where is America? America does have a minimum age for marriage.  And if someone wishes to get married prior to that age - they need the consent of the court. If you have different information post the links.  If you don't post links - then you have nothing. 



- The founder of Islam Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) was the greatest human being who brought justice & mercy to the world, to establish peace, honor women, end racism, spread freedom of religion & equity among all; & his wife Aisha is the most influential woman in Islam. You're conflating the great Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) with your bloody founders. 
Muhammed was a pedophile.  He ought to be canceled. 


- It's just that you don't know your history. Consensual marriage in the West comes from Islam, through Andalusia -thanks to Prophet Muhammed (pbuh). Pre-12th century, the Church did not establish consensual marriage, & that still persisted in the West until late 19th century. Divorce was also forbidden, subjecting women to essentially life-imprisonment. This didn't change until mid-20th century, after so much pressure from within to be like Muslims. Again, thanks to Prophet Muhammed (pbuh). Though, to be fair, the West is not the only culpable in this case, India as well. Women didn't have property rights in the West until the 20th century. In fact, in France it was until 1939. Muslim women had full property rights since day one, of course thanks to Prophet Muhammed (pbuh). I can go on & on & on...
I do know my history.  Are you saying consensual marriage is good or arranged marriages are good? It appears you have contradicted yourself again. I think you are confusing Arab history with Arab history. 

The father is the head of the house.  Do you deny it? The eldest brother rules. Do you deny it? 
- No, God is the head of the family & of society in general. The man performs his role in society fulfilling his duties as a father, a husband, a son, a neighbor, an employee, a tenant, a friend...etc. Every connection a person has with another entails a role, with rights & dues. 
There is no god.  So you agree - the father is the one who has to fulfill the role of boss over everyone else.    Talk about a copout.  



- Damn! You don't know anything do you!? Arranged marriage = forced marriage. Though, forced marriages are prevalent in the US as well, most states do not prohibit it. 
If there are forced marriages in US - then they are illegal.    You should report any if you know of any. Otherwise you are just getting emotional because the truth is the truth. 



- Lmao! I guess you don't know. That's the general reputation the West has elsewhere. We can see the news; sex-tourism is dominated by westerners... You know the age of consent in Mexico is 12 years old... You can do the math.
A general reputation by people who are envious of the West is not necessarily the most reliable measure of the truth.  I think a better method is - by watching how many people vote with their feet.  More people come to the West every year from the rest of the world than go to the rest of the world from the West. Why? Because despite its obvious shortfalls - it is preferable than staying in the rest of the world.  



- That's not true. Incest, zoophilia... are legal in much of the West. 
They are not legal. Stop making things up. telling such transparent lies is embarrassing for you.  Is that what your Muslim leader teach you? TO lie - because it is good to speak good of Islam no matter how evil it is.  yassine - the ends do not justify the means.  



- That's propaganda. You keep forgetting I'm not American, this mantra means nothing to me. They keep telling you this day & night. It doesn't mean it's necessarily the case. Every state has PR.
No not propaganda.  I am not American either.  I don't have to be told - I see it all of the time with my own eyes. 



- America is a rich country, handshake bribes are not worth the risk. Bribes are in the millions & in the billions. Tax evasion in the US is upwards of ONE TRILLION USD per year. In the US corruption is legalized. A lawyer can lie under the protection of the Law & sell himself to the highest bidder. A corporation can lobby -corrupt- the government for its own interests. A pharmacologist can charge a small fortune to a low-class citizen for his profit... 
You really are indoctrinated aren't you? Think about what you are saying.  Imagine if any of the arab nations could have tax evasion of so much money? They could not because their systems are so bad.  



- You're hopelessly delusional. Can't you break a little bit the stereotype!? You have backwards, Western countries use aid & bribes & various other persuasive means -offers you can not refuse, to pressure countries to cede to their interests. They have been doing this since colonial days, it has never stopped. In fact, it was US official policy to ration African countries for population control, unless they cede to American demands, because these countries do not have other options. But the world is different today, there are options. China is rising as a super power. The balance is shifting.
the one who is delusional is you.   I already said Western nations use bribes in non-western nations where bribing is expected.  Go to Ukraine. Go to Bangladesh. Go to Indonesia or Maylasia.  Bribing is expected to get anything done.  

If this was done in PNG or Australia you would get thrown in prison.  China is rising. 


- Did I shock you that much? You can't handle the truth?... In effect, if you're confident you have the truth, then you can just disprove my lies & establish your truths. Shouldn't be hard right?
The only thing that shocks me is how gullible you are - you really believe the propaganda they teach you.  

I am good with the truth. But I am not confident you are.  
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,067
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Timid8967
Which is wrong?

Multiple spouses.

or multiple sex partners.

One is concept based.

One is reality based.

Right and wrong are also concept based.
Timid8967
Timid8967's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 459
2
2
2
Timid8967's avatar
Timid8967
2
2
2
-->
@zedvictor4
Which is wrong?

Multiple spouses.

or multiple sex partners.

One is concept based.

One is reality based.

Right and wrong are also concept based.


I have been talking legal v illegal - not right v wrong. Or at least that is what I have thought I have been discussing.

multiple spouses in the West is illegal. Multiple sex partners is not illegal.  Multiple de facto partners is not illegal.  

Bigamy is illegal. As is incest, pedophilia and a bestiality.

I also think that forced marriages are illegal in the west. not sure about arranged marriages. But dowry is  illegal. 




Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
-->
@Timid8967
So I guess that's a no then. You have none - not even one example and just make wild claims.  I was actually hoping you might have substance to your nonsense. 
- The western society of today is actually virtually identical to other & past societies. LMAO!

Sorry - not solid logic.  the word lawful means legal.  Polygamy is wrong in my opinion.
- Your logic aside, what do you hold the opinion that polygamy is wrong.

That does not even make sense.  You seem to misunderstand the law of non-contradiction.
- It does not make sense indeed; case in point. 

However if you think that is what I have said - please express it so. 
- Already did, maybe you've missed it. Try squinting.

 yassine - to have more than one wife is to commit adultery or unfaithfulness against the first wife. 
- Friend, adultery = extramarital intercourse. Lawful polygamy, by definition, can not coincide with adultery. Saying marital-extramarital intercourse is squaring the circle...

Adultery is prevalent everywhere. You should speak to the Muslim families I know - where children dislike their father who has two separate families.  One of my closest friends left Indonesia to come to PNG - because her father favored her half siblings from his second wife.  
- Are you PNG then? Regardless, a proof by example is a logical fallacy. I can cite dozens of thousands of examples from the US of similar stories. The fact is, polygamous relationships (multiple partners) are far more prevalent in the West than elsewhere. In Europe, more than a third of spouses have extramarital relationships. Makes you wonder how bad the situation is for non-spouses...

Unlike you, I accept that the Muslim world has done bad things - but I also acknowledge the West has too.
- False equivalence. You only saying that because you don't know history. I know much of Islamic history, & a good part of Western history. Whatever bad things the Islamic world may have done, the Western world has eclipsed by orders of magnitude -strictly speaking. Pick a history book, you will vomit from disgust. If you believe the Muslim world has committed comparable things to the Western world, then let's have a debate about that.

You seem to think that the West deny their evils. You obviously don't know too many Westerners. Or if you do - you just reject their views.
- First of all, there will always be voices from all sides of the spectrum. The predominant voices, however, are always dictated by power. In today's West, the imperious power is still in control, thus the voice of hegemony & denial dominates. Second of all, most individual westerns know very little about their history, especially the undesirable parts. It's an imperative policy of education in the West to teach civil values & national narrative. Do you think they teach French atrocities to the French people at school or academia? No. Their major focus is in vilifying their made up enemies to facilitate invasions & massacres. 

I am not American.  
- Why are defending them?

No it is not a drop in the bucket. There were more people killed in the 20th century than in the rest of human history.
- One, that's actually not true. Close though. Two, wether pre-20th century or post-20th century, the West has managed to hog more than 50% of the death toll. If we go by Western ideology, including Communism & nationalism... the figure will jump close to 70%. Three, of course it's a drop in a bucket, we are speaking of an order of magnitude of difference. We are talking about +550 million deaths in the past 1000 years from wars instigated by the West & Christians.

You need to read some more history - try reading something at all - would be nice. 
- You should take your own advice, you direly need it.

Islam is a religion of violence.
- & the Earth is flat.

It advocates full submission or beheading by its fundamentalists. Fundamentalists who make up the majority of Islamists.
- Can you be more cliche?! Let's have a debate about that. You're already on your way to having your first round.

The minority which are nominal do not understand Islam
- Islam is the religion of Prophet Muhammed (pbuh), & his legacy are the Ulama. We take our religion from the Ulama, not from whoever. 

  - like the majority of Christians who are also nominal do not understand their religion.  
- Take it up with them.

I think the better recourse would be to use what I call victim's rights. 
- Which is...?
 
do you mean wives not submitting or being disobedient? 
- Sounds like you got something to say?

Where is America? America does have a minimum age for marriage.
- Things don't just magically become true when you spout them out of your mouth!

 And if someone wishes to get married prior to that age - they need the consent of the court. If you have different information post the links.
- You're confusing minimum age with age of majority. Several states in the US do *not* have a minimum age, that's a fact. Some that do, have it as low as 12. Court permission, parental consent, pregnancy, majority, emancipation...etc, are legal considerations.

If you don't post links - then you have nothing. 
- You're inventing new fallacies, post-links fallacy..

Muhammed was a pedophile. He ought to be canceled.
- Childish. Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) contributed most to humanity & the world, spread peace & justice, taught mercy & forgiveness, he is adored & emulated by 2 billion people today, & will be adored until the end of time. In 4 decades, the Muslim world will comprise 40% of global population. 

I do know my history.
- Sure you do.

  Are you saying consensual marriage is good or arranged marriages are good? It appears you have contradicted yourself again.
- Arranged marriages are consensual marriages... Arranged marriages are *not* forced marriages as you seem to imagine. They are consensual marriages arranged by families & friends, by way of matchmaking.

 I think you are confusing Arab history with Arab history. 
- Easy to confuse, given they are literally the same thing. Or, typo?

There is no god.  So you agree - the father is the one who has to fulfill the role of boss over everyone else.    Talk about a copout.  
- Does it make you feel better to convince yourself with your own delusions?

If there are forced marriages in US - then they are illegal.
- Yet, still prevalent. Forced marriage is illegal everywhere too. 

You should report any if you know of any. Otherwise you are just getting emotional because the truth is the truth. 
- The even worse issue in the West is the prevalence of sexual abuse. They replaced explicit consent, i.e. marriage, with purported consent.  

A general reputation by people who are envious of the West is not necessarily the most reliable measure of the truth. 
- Lmao! It's always the same old tricks. No creativity. "they are envious of us", "they hate our democracy", to save themselves from blame, when they have no other defense. Where do you live? You seem utterly detached from the reality of the world. 

I think a better method is - by watching how many people vote with their feet. More people come to the West every year from the rest of the world than go to the rest of the world from the West. Why? Because despite its obvious shortfalls - it is preferable than staying in the rest of the world.  
- No, they move from the places the West pillaged, invaded & destroyed to expand their own wealth & hegemony...

They are not legal. Stop making things up. telling such transparent lies is embarrassing for you.
- Umm... wut? Do you live under a rock or something?

Is that what your Muslim leader teach you? TO lie - because it is good to speak good of Islam no matter how evil it is.  yassine - the ends do not justify the means.  
- You're projecting again.

No not propaganda.  I am not American either.  I don't have to be told - I see it all of the time with my own eyes. 
- It's hard to perceive the propaganda when you get raised in it. 

You really are indoctrinated aren't you? Think about what you are saying.  Imagine if any of the arab nations could have tax evasion of so much money? They could not because their systems are so bad.  
- Is this another jab at the law of non-contradiction...? So, let me get this straight, Arab nations could not have such large tax evasion as the US because their system is so corrupt that it does not allow as much corruption as the US system does... I'm seriously beginning to think you have some cognitive thing going on there, you don't think things through, & you end up imagining the opposite of what is the case. 

the one who is delusional is you.   I already said Western nations use bribes in non-western nations where bribing is expected.  Go to Ukraine. Go to Bangladesh. Go to Indonesia or Maylasia.  Bribing is expected to get anything done.  
- That's actually not true. You have such a ghetto view of the world, yet such a rosy fantastic image of the West. You talk about petty bribery, I am talking about a global scamming power that invades, threatens, extorts & use any means necessary to gain in its zero sum game. This reminds of a quote from Perkins in his book Confessions of an Economic Hitman, "Economic hit men are highly paid professionals who cheat countries around the globe out of trillions of dollars. They funnel money from the World Bank, the US Agency for International Development and other foreign "aid" organizations into the coffers of huge corporations and the pockets of a few wealthy families who control the planet's natural resources. Their tools included fraudulent financial reports, rigged elections, payoffs, extortion, sex, and murder. They play a game as old as empire, but one that has taken on new and terrifying dimensions during this time of globalization." 

If this was done in PNG or Australia you would get thrown in prison. 
- I can guess where you're coming from. This is childish nonsense. 

China is rising.
- Yes, & so is Indonesia & Turkey & Malaysia & Muslim countries in general. The OIC countries (Muslim majority countries) have already surpassed the US & the EU in GDP, with an industrial output almost the combined output of the US & the EU. Indonesia's industrial sector is larger than that of Germany & Russia, & almost the size of Japan's. The economic miracle the West experienced post-WWII is happening today to the Muslim world, except with faster growing population & economy. In 1950, Germany had more people than Indonesia, by 2050 Indonesia will have more than 6 times the population of Germany. Western countries will soon be eclipsed, that's simply inevitable. 

The only thing that shocks me is how gullible you are - you really believe the propaganda they teach you.  
- You have yet to say a sensible thing.

I am good with the truth. But I am not confident you are.  
- Then you should be confident about defending your claims in a debate. How about this: 'Islam is a religion of violence?'



FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,596
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@Yassine
The OIC countries (Muslim majority countries) have already surpassed the US & the EU in GDP,

Not true, the Islamic World's nominal GDP currently stands at a grand total of $6.25 trillion dollars, spread over a population of 1.6 billion people. For comparison India, which has an approximately similar sized population to the Islamic world (1.3 billion), has an economy worth $2.45 trillion dollars. Much of the Muslim world still lags behind countries such as Japan ($4.8 trillion dollars) and the United States ($18.6 trillion dollars) however, who have much smaller populations (127 million; 323 million respectively) but are highly industrialised, as well place a particular emphasis on science. Additionally China's current economy is worth $11.8 trillion dollars (with a population of 1.41 billion. Progress, however, is more rapid in some countries than others; for example Indonesia (population 261 million) became the first country in the Islamic world to surpass the trillion dollar mark in 2017, with Turkey closely behind at almost achieving this target (which currently stands at $841.2 billion dollars). Malaysia too is a laudable case, which is set to reach a nominal GDP of $500 billion dollars by 2022, with a population of only 34.2 million people. Significantly, these more advanced Muslim economies are not solely oil-based economies (with the exception of Saudi Arabia; $678 billion dollars and with a population of 32.4 million), but have rapidly been expanding in economic complexity over the years. Perhaps far more exciting is that the macroeconomic trends show the Islamic world will accrue a total nominal GDP wealth of $8.85 trillion dollars by 2022 (representing an average growth rate of 7% to 2022).
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,067
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Timid8967
Polygamy is wrong in my opinion.

Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
-->
@FLRW
- I'm glad to see others interested in this like I am. Though, it is strange that you're using nominal GDP figures to compare the economic & industrial size of countries! Nominal GDP is market exchange rate based (FOREX), it doesn't say much about domestic production & industrial output. In this case, real GDP, which is based on purchasing power parity, is generally used instead. Take a house in the US that costs $250k, the same exact house in Turkey will cost $70k because of exchange rates (XR). Nominal GDP is also not reliable because currencies are often volatile. The UK lost a fifth of its nominal GDP over night after Brexit announcement, even though its economy was the same. The Russian rubble depreciated more than 5000 times against the USD during the period 1990-1997, that does not mean the Russian economy fell 5000 times... Nonetheless, nominal GDP is a good measure to emphasis:
1. Projection of power: the higher the XR, the easier it is to project power (if all else is equal).
2. Dependence on imports: the higher the XR, the lower is your foreign bill. Higher XR is important for countries which rely on foreign sources of energy.
3. Competitiveness in exports: the lower the XR, the more competitive your exports are, i.e. the cheaper your goods are in the global market. Lower XR is vital to economies relying on exports. 
4. Default on foreign debt: the higher the XR, the easier it is to pay foreign debt. Higher XR is critical for countries with a lot of foreign debt.
5. FDI (foreign direct investment): the lower the XR, the more benefits one reaps. Lower XR + FDI is a recipe for great potential. For example, with a PPP exchange rate of 3x, the same amount of FDI will get you three bridges instead of one. That's a great deal.

- In general, maintaining higher XR is most beneficial for developed nations, because they heavily rely on foreign resources & imported cheap goods, & their economies are mainly driven my domestic consumption & less by exports, it also makes it easier for their companies to invest abroad. Contrastingly, developing nations prefer maintaining a lower XR, to become more competitive in the global market & to maximize benefit from FDI. The wealthier a nation, the more consumptive & thus less relying on exports, hence the higher its XR. In this respect, for a developed nation, significantly devaluing the currency is virtually suicide. & for a developing nation, deflating their currency to USD level would simple cripple growth. Having a high nominal GDP does not necessarily mean having the best position, the contrary is often the case, unless it's about projection of power. Developing nations, however, care less for projection of power & more for growth. China is notorious for managing ("manipulating") its currency to maintain global market share. Turkey is constantly inflating its currency to boost exports & hog market shares, which hit new records every single year. As long as this formula keeps working they will keep on it.

- Real GDP is the measure of domestic economic output based on purchasing power parity rates. For instance, domestically speaking, what just $1 gets you in Turkey, $3.7 gets you in the US. These currency rates are calculated based on purchasing power, rather than market exchange. To compare economic output, domestic consumption, inflation rates, income or GDP growth, we must use real GDP. 

Not true, the Islamic World's nominal GDP currently stands at a grand total of $6.25 trillion dollars, spread over a population of 1.6 billion people. For comparison India, which has an approximately similar sized population to the Islamic world (1.3 billion), has an economy worth $2.45 trillion dollars.
- Despite the fact that the figures are outdated, nominal GDP is misleading, it doesn't say anything about the actual size of the economy of these countries. The USD & EUR being global reserve currencies radically skew exchange rates. In truth, as of 2020 (in 2010 constant USD adjusted for inflation) real GDP of the OIC stood at $22.4T, the US at $20.5T, the EU at $18.4T, China at $28T, & India at $11.5T, & Japan at $5.5T, spread over a population of 1.97B, & .33B, & .45B, & 1.44B, & 1.38B, & .13 -respectively; thus an average income of $11.4k, & $62.8k, & $41.0k, & $19.5k, & $8.2, & $43.7k -respectively; with a real industrial output (using 2019 figures) of $7.8T, & $4.1T, & $4.6T, & $10.9T, & $2.8T, & $1.7T -respectively, & a scientific (S&E) output (2019 scjmr figures) of 328k, & 503k, & 765k, & 641k, & 162k, & 122k documents -respectively.

Much of the Muslim world still lags behind countries such as Japan ($4.8 trillion dollars) and the United States ($18.6 trillion dollars)
-  One, the OIC countries, aka Muslim world, are quite heterogenous, with vastly different levels of wealth & development. From some of the richest to some to the poorest in the world. Qatar boasted an average income of $121k in 2020, Turkey registered a $30.6k value, while in Niger it's less than $1.5k. Two, it's not about lag, it's about growth. Most countries in the Muslim world today are experiencing an 'economic boom', the type sustained by western countries post WWII, only more intense. It took the last 42 years for the EU economy to double in size & 33 years for the US, but only 17 years for the OIC. [it took just 13 years for China] 

however, who have much smaller populations (127 million; 323 million respectively) but are highly industrialised,
- That's not true anymore for western countries, which are deindustrializing -with the exception of few. Between the period 2000-2020, France's industrial sector shrunk from $530B down to $490B, while Turkey's industrial sector grew from $250B up to $700B in the same period -under Erdogan. In fact, Turkey consumes 25% more energy in industry than France. Developed nations have been shifting their economies away from Industry into Services. Malaysia's industrial output per capita ($12.7k, 2019 figures) is actually higher than that of the US ($12.6), & the gap will only widen in the future. Turkey's ($8.4k) is higher than that in France or the UK ($8.1k). 

as well place a particular emphasis on science.
- Scientific output in the OIC grew 13 times in the last 20 years (15 times for China), whereas it has stagnated in the West. There were more publications by the US in 2012 than there were in 2019. That, knowing that at least half the researchers in S&E in the US or in Europe are foreigners, mainly from China, India, Korea & the Muslim world. Particularly, about a fifth of PhDs in the US & Europe originate in Muslim countries. Since 2017, the number of PhDs choosing to stay in the US has been dropping. It's becoming increasingly less compelling for students to migrate for education when they can find it in their home country. Given this progress, it's only a matter of time that the OIC countries will surpass the US & the EU in scientific publications. From a perspective of provenance (counting only native research), that's almost already the case. 

Additionally China's current economy is worth $11.8 trillion dollars (with a population of 1.41 billion. 
- These figures are old. China is a special case, for its RMB has not yet been freely traded. The country holds more than $3T of USD in reserve currency & other assets, that's close to a third of circulated USD. If the RMB hits the market it will likely lead to a significant drop in USD value across the board. In that event, the nominal GDP of China will inevitably skyrocket to match real GDP ($28T), or rather the USD will depreciate. This, of course, is not beneficial to China, because they don't want their goods to rise in value & lose market share. Their economy still relies on exports, but they are moving fast towards a consumerist economy. When China feels comfortable about its consumption based economy, it will have no problem dropping the dollar.

Progress, however, is more rapid in some countries than others; for example Indonesia (population 261 million) became the first country in the Islamic world to surpass the trillion dollar mark in 2017
- In nominal terms, yes. In real terms, the GDP is $3.8T to surpass Germany & Russia to become 5th in the next couple of years, though it has already surpassed them in industrial output. Indonesia has also experienced one of the fastest burst of scientific publications in the world, increasing 70 times over the past 20 years. Within a decade, Indonesia will have a population roughly that of the US. Given the economic boom that has been taking over the country, Indonesia could very well become a US rival not too long in the future.

, with Turkey closely behind at almost achieving this target (which currently stands at $841.2 billion dollars).
- This is a good example why nominal GDP is deceptive. Turkey registered a $958B nominal GDP in 2013 & $720B in 2020 (in current USD), when in reality its economy expanded by 53% during that period. In real terms, Turkey's 2020 GDP stood at $2.62T, at rank 11, surpassing thus Italy ($2.26T) & Mexico ($2.48T) & closing in on France ($2.88T). If Turkey decides to raise interests, the Turkish Lira will naturally appreciate significantly. So far, that't not the policy they chose.

Malaysia too is a laudable case, which is set to reach a nominal GDP of $500 billion dollars by 2022, with a population of only 34.2 million people.
- In real terms, Malaysia's GDP (in 2010 constant USD adjusted for inflation) is $1.09T, not too far from Australia's $1.29T. Malaysia started its economic boom in the 90s from a poor agricultural nation, & it's still growing. Indeed impressive.

Significantly, these more advanced Muslim economies are not solely oil-based economies (with the exception of Saudi Arabia; $678 billion dollars and with a population of 32.4 million), but have rapidly been expanding in economic complexity over the years.
- Indeed, that is true.

Perhaps far more exciting is that the macroeconomic trends show the Islamic world will accrue a total nominal GDP wealth of $8.85 trillion dollars by 2022 (representing an average growth rate of 7% to 2022). 
- Given the current trend, the Muslim world should surpass the Western world in terms of economic & scientific output by 2040.



TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@Timid8967
Out of curiosity, are you Mormon?  I don't think it's a cult, but if you are a Mormon, something about Mormonism doesn't make sense(even compared to other branches of christianity):

Mormonism was when there were these tablets found in upstate NY I think and the Book of Mormon is 200 pages or so of text that was found on the tablets.  My question that alienates me from Mormonism more than the rest of christianity is how can you fit 200 pages of text on a tablet?  This leads me to believe that Mormonism couldn't have occurred, although I don't know too much about it as I don't live in Utah.
Timid8967
Timid8967's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 459
2
2
2
Timid8967's avatar
Timid8967
2
2
2
-->
@TheUnderdog
Hi the underdog,

I am not Mormon. 

I happen to think Mormonism is a fraudulent cult of Christianity. 

Nevertheless, they are a large organization and VERY RICH. I actually heard that they own the whole or a significant amount of Pepsi. 

I can't speak as to their tablet.  Perhaps fauxlaw might do so.  He is a very knowledgible source and easy to talk to  
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@fauxlaw
Perhaps fauxlaw might do so.  He is a very knowledgible source and easy to talk to  
Do you know anything about my questions to Timid8967?
fauxlaw
fauxlaw's avatar
Debates: 77
Posts: 3,565
4
7
10
fauxlaw's avatar
fauxlaw
4
7
10
-->
@TheUnderdog
Mormonism was when there were these tablets found in upstate NY I think and the Book of Mormon is 200 pages or so of text that was found on the tablets.  My question that alienates me from Mormonism more than the rest of christianity is how can you fit 200 pages of text on a tablet?  This leads me to believe that Mormonism couldn't have occurred, although I don't know too much about it as I don't live in Utah.
Glad to answer your questions:

The tablets you speak of were really thin, gold plates. Not sure of the size, but they seem to have been approx. 9" x 6" x 1mm, in a stack bound by two or three rings, like a modern 3-ring binder. The number of plates is not known for certain, but they were edited from a larger complex of records over 1,000 years, roughly 600 BCE to 400 CE. The original group beginning the record was a family, fathered by a merchant-turned-prophet in Jerusalem during the reign of Zedekiah when Jerusalem was sacked and taken captive by Babylon. The prophet's name was Lehi. Before the desrtuction, he took his family into the wilderness south of Jerusalem and traveled over a period of 8 years to what is probably, today, the south coast of Oman and from there, built and sailed a ship either west through the Mediterranean to the Atlantic, or east through the Indian Ocean to the Pacific [the record speaks very little of that ocean journey] to land somewhere along the east or west coast of North or South America. It's vague because all of about less than 20 verses speak of the entire ocean journey. Here they lived abut a thousand years, and the visit of Jesus Christ is detailed after his resurrection and ascension from Jerusalem. I have read it numerous times and know it to be a true testament of Christ.

It was written in a language called reformed Egyptian in the record itself. The characters are unrecognizable to any currently know ancient language, but there are some similarities to both Egyptian hieroglyphs, in which I happen to be fluent, and ancient Hebrew. Both languages have a very concise syntax; much can be said in few words, much less than in English. In English, the Book of Mormon is about 520 pages. So, it is, itself, a fallacy that what appears in English from the whole text in reformed Egyptian is not an impossibility even if the language were either Egyptian hieroglyphs or Hebrew; there were sufficient plates to contain the text.

We have members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in every State in the Union, and about 160 other countries, with just less than 17M members worldwide.


TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@fauxlaw
Okay.  If what you say is true, that makes sense.

FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,596
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@TheUnderdog
See:  Mormonism: A Racket Becomes a Religion
fauxlaw
fauxlaw's avatar
Debates: 77
Posts: 3,565
4
7
10
fauxlaw's avatar
fauxlaw
4
7
10
-->
@FLRW
Some people will believe any shyte they hear. That's on them. I'll wager your reference says nothing of the charity, education, and first response assistance rendered around the world over more than 100 years. And, yes, no doubt Pepsi is part of a large portfolio of investments. Anything wrong with that? It happens to be legal, but those funds are kept separate from any purchase of real property & goods for use in religious purposes, and a public report is issued every year, as required by the US Gov't, and has never been questioned. Does your source mention that, or is it baseless innuendo, which it usually is. At least TheUnderdog is asking honest questions. Too proud to do that?
Timid8967
Timid8967's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 459
2
2
2
Timid8967's avatar
Timid8967
2
2
2
-->
@fauxlaw
Do you guys wear special undergarments? And do you ever take them off? 
Timid8967
Timid8967's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 459
2
2
2
Timid8967's avatar
Timid8967
2
2
2
-->
@TheUnderdog
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,596
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@fauxlaw

In March 1826 a court in Bainbridge, New York, convicted a twenty-one-year-old man of being “a disorderly person and an impostor.” That ought to have been all we ever heard of Joseph Smith, who at trial admitted to defrauding citizens by organizing mad gold-digging expeditions and also to claiming to possess dark or “necromantic” powers. However, within four years he was back in the local newspapers (all of which one may still read) as the discoverer of the “Book of Mormon.” He had two huge local advantages which most mountebanks and charlatans do not possess. First, he was operating in the same hectically pious district that gave us the Shakers and several other self-proclaimed American prophets. So notorious did this local tendency become that the region became known as the “Burned-Over District,” in honor of the way in which it had surrendered to one religious craze after another. Second, he was operating in an area which, unlike large tracts of the newly opening North America, did possess the signs of an ancient history.


K_Michael
K_Michael's avatar
Debates: 38
Posts: 749
4
5
10
K_Michael's avatar
K_Michael
4
5
10
-->
@Timid8967
I was raised LDS, for context. Yes, endowed members (endowed doesn't refer to baptism but a ritual performed in the temple before you can get married) of the LDS church wear "garments" (I was never endowed, so my information is likely not quite as accurate as fauxlaw's) which consist of basically white shorts and shirts. You do wash them, and no one I knew of wore them swimming, but my parents wore them at all other times, sleeping and otherwise. They have some symbols stitched (embroidered?) on them that some people say have Illuminati/Freemason symbolism, but I couldn't speak to that.
Lemming
Lemming's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,346
4
4
10
Lemming's avatar
Lemming
4
4
10
-->
@K_Michael
Eh, common in cultures or religions, to have customs.
Whether behavior, clothing, so on.
K_Michael
K_Michael's avatar
Debates: 38
Posts: 749
4
5
10
K_Michael's avatar
K_Michael
4
5
10
-->
@Lemming
Eh, common in cultures or religions, to have customs.
Whether behavior, clothing, so on.
I'm confused as to why this was addressed to me. It reads as an explanation or dismissal to me, but I never expressed any confusion over any customs.
Lemming
Lemming's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,346
4
4
10
Lemming's avatar
Lemming
4
4
10
-->
@K_Michael
My bad, I didn't mean it as explanatory, or dismissive.
Just a passing remark, I wouldn't pay my comment much mind.
K_Michael
K_Michael's avatar
Debates: 38
Posts: 749
4
5
10
K_Michael's avatar
K_Michael
4
5
10
k   

413 days later

Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,006
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@Timid8967
Why is the LDS considered a cult and not a proper Christian denomination?

What are the primary points of similarity that put it in the Christian camp? And what are the points of doctrine which distinguish it from the traditional Christian position? And what are the unique and distinct perspectives of the Mormons that radically uplift it into weird territory?

Please do not use this as a slanging board against the LDS.  Use it as an opportunity to compare and contrast and analyze the Mormons and the veracity of its doctrines. 

Mormons deny many of the central teachings of historical, traditional Christianity. This is no secret; one of the main doctrines of Mormonism is that God told their prophet, Joseph Smith, that all of the Christian denominations were wrong. Joseph believed he was called by God to restore the true religion of God, and that meant he had to call all the existing Christian churches (denominations) false.

If you call Christianity false, then it’s pretty strange to call yourself Christian. Yet, that’s what Joseph Smith did. He said that Mormonism replaces Christianity. However, he wanted to have his cake and eat it, too. He said that his religion believes in Jesus (although Mormon Jesus is very different from Christian Jesus), so his religion should be called Christian.

The argument continues almost 200 years since the founding of Mormonism. The Mormons say they are Christians (the only true Christians), and the Christians say they are non-Christian, or, at best, a “Christian cult.”