Biden says patriots will be unable to stop the tyranny he is leadingnus towards

Author: Wylted
Biden

Posts

Total: 22
Topic's author
#1
Wylted
Wylted's avatar
Debates: 34
Posts: 5,754
3
4
11
Wylted's avatar
Wylted
3
4
11
Biden has announced that he is banning guns. In part because he envisions a future where Patriots are defenseless against tyrants. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/jun/24/biden-says-future-patriots-face-lost-cause-against/

He essentially is threatening to send military grade weapons against dissidents who want a voice in their government. 

The ruler of the United States is out of control. 
#2
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,169
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@Wylted
The US couldn’t do anything to the Taliban for 20 years in Afghanistan, what makes him think the same shit will work here lol
#3
oromagi
oromagi's avatar
Debates: 117
Posts: 8,696
8
10
11
oromagi's avatar
oromagi
8
10
11
-->
@Wylted
Biden has announced that he is banning guns.
just another stupid lie from wylted.  Let's remember that Wylted thinks America sucks and thinks Putin's dictatorship is the correction America needs.  Obviously, promoting such a plan requires a huge amount of deception.
Topic's author
#4
Wylted
Wylted's avatar
Debates: 34
Posts: 5,754
3
4
11
Wylted's avatar
Wylted
3
4
11
-->
@oromagi
Biden has ended freedom of he press by shutting own almost 50 news sites he disagrees with https://niyitabiti.net/2021/06/us-government-blocks-36-iranian-affiliated-news-websites/
#5
oromagi
oromagi's avatar
Debates: 117
Posts: 8,696
8
10
11
oromagi's avatar
oromagi
8
10
11
-->
@Wylted
sounds like a different topic to me.  why not concede your  OP lies here and we can address other lies from you in other forums?
Topic's author
#6
Wylted
Wylted's avatar
Debates: 34
Posts: 5,754
3
4
11
Wylted's avatar
Wylted
3
4
11
-->
@oromagi
He literally made a veiled threat against anyone trying to stop his Bilderburger agenda.i'll take his attack on freedom of president to another thread though. Good ideal
#7
oromagi
oromagi's avatar
Debates: 117
Posts: 8,696
8
10
11
oromagi's avatar
oromagi
8
10
11
 The Bilderberg meeting (also known as the Bilderberg Group) is an annual conference established in 1954 to foster dialogue between Europe and North America. The group’s agenda, originally to prevent another world war, is now defined as bolstering a consensus around free market Western capitalism and its interests around the globe.
  • I'm ok with US presidents fostering economic dialogue between Europe and N America
  • I'm ok with US presidents working to prevent world war
  • I'm ok with US presidents bolstering free market capitalism

Topic's author
#8
Wylted
Wylted's avatar
Debates: 34
Posts: 5,754
3
4
11
Wylted's avatar
Wylted
3
4
11
-->
@oromagi
It's secretive nature about the policy decisions made there is a confession of something darker.  Not to mention meeting in secret with international leaders to make policy decisions for the United states is illegal.  
#9
oromagi
oromagi's avatar
Debates: 117
Posts: 8,696
8
10
11
oromagi's avatar
oromagi
8
10
11
-->
@Wylted
@oromagi
It's secretive nature about the policy decisions made there is a confession of something darker.  Not to mention meeting in secret with international leaders to make policy decisions for the United states is illegal.  
crazy talk. Governments make policy not economists.  Name one US  policy that the economists of Bilderberg  forced upon the American people without the US government
Topic's author
#10
Wylted
Wylted's avatar
Debates: 34
Posts: 5,754
3
4
11
Wylted's avatar
Wylted
3
4
11
-->
@oromagi


Occasionally notes make it out,  they sty a global agenda there
#11
oromagi
oromagi's avatar
Debates: 117
Posts: 8,696
8
10
11
oromagi's avatar
oromagi
8
10
11
-->
@Wylted
Name one US  policy that the economists (and other participants)  of Bilderberg  forced upon the American people without the US government
Topic's author
#12
Wylted
Wylted's avatar
Debates: 34
Posts: 5,754
3
4
11
Wylted's avatar
Wylted
3
4
11
-->
@oromagi
They are obviously directing american politicians with the policy decisions made there, they aren't a part of the system only a malevolent entity that directs the politicians who rule the system. 

Topic's author
#13
Wylted
Wylted's avatar
Debates: 34
Posts: 5,754
3
4
11
Wylted's avatar
Wylted
3
4
11
Why are you focused on economists. Prince Andrew is not an economist, the Clinton's aren't economists. The topics of discussion they publicly list are mostly not concerning economics.  
#14
oromagi
oromagi's avatar
Debates: 117
Posts: 8,696
8
10
11
oromagi's avatar
oromagi
8
10
11
-->
@Wylted
Why are you focused on economists. Prince Andrew is not an economist, the Clinton's aren't economists. The topics of discussion they publicly list are mostly not concerning economics.  
Prince Andrew has an A level in Economics from Gordonstoun but has never participated in Bilderburg
Bill Clinton read economics at Oxford and spoke at Bilderburg as Governor of Arkansas
Hillary Clinton participated in Bilderburg as First Lady in '97

The group’s agenda, originally to prevent another world war, is now defined as bolstering a consensus around free market Western capitalism and its interests around the globe. Participants include political leaders, experts from industry, finance, academia, and the media, numbering between 120 and 150.
Topic's author
#15
Wylted
Wylted's avatar
Debates: 34
Posts: 5,754
3
4
11
Wylted's avatar
Wylted
3
4
11
-->
@oromagi
The group’s agenda, originally to prevent another world war, is now defined as bolstering a consensus around free market Western capitalism and its interests around the globe. Participants include political leaders, experts from industry, finance, academia, and the media, numbering between 120 and 150.

That is literally what their critics say about them
 You just GOOGLED the first site who did not 
have an overtly negative spin on them and decided to take that site at it's word. Spreading capitalism is what their critics accuse them of. 

Not that it matters too much, you are kinda just accepting the most positive spin you can have, only because you like disagreeing with what I say. The bilderberg groupings a threat to liberal democracy which you claim to support, because they meet in secret using Chatham house rules so they can maintain the secrecy, probably for reasons the general public would view as malevolent if they came to light, and they dictate policies to american politicians. 


The list of topics at the 2019 meeting. The part of the list they will admit to anyway includes topics such as artificial intelligence,  China, Russia. Only one of the topics listed mentions economics.  

Why are you okay with policy decisions made by secretive NWO groups like the Bilderburgers and the skull and bones society in a liberal democracy anyway?

Was all that shit about liberal democracy just you kissing the ass of the elite, hoping that when their agenda is complete they will award you?

Well as George Carlin said, you ain't  a part of that club. You will not be rewarded for simultaneously praising democracy while being fine turning a blind eye to secretive groups who look to subvert democracy. 

#16
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,084
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Wylted
One mans patriot is another mans tyrant.

So, thank goodness for democracy and a constitution.

After all, a good republican should also be a good democrat.

A republican that isn't also a democrat, therefore aspires to tyranny.

And democrats that aren't democrats, aren't democrats.


The lasting image from the last election is the old guy in the parking lot, his head streaked with sweat and dye.

The orange guy is largely forgotten now.
#17
oromagi
oromagi's avatar
Debates: 117
Posts: 8,696
8
10
11
oromagi's avatar
oromagi
8
10
11
-->
@Wylted
->@oromagi
The group’s agenda, originally to prevent another world war, is now defined as bolstering a consensus around free market Western capitalism and its interests around the globe. Participants include political leaders, experts from industry, finance, academia, and the media, numbering between 120 and 150.
That is literally what their critics say about them. Spreading capitalism is what their critics accuse them of. 
  • Again, I'm ok with US presidents bolstering free market capitalism
Not that it matters too much, you are kinda just accepting the most positive spin you can have, only because you like disagreeing with what I say.
  • Actually, I just enjoy debunking conspiracy theories
The bilderberg groupings a threat to liberal democracy which you claim to support, because they meet in secret using Chatham house rules so they can maintain the secrecy, probably for reasons the general public would view as malevolent if they came to light,
  • Under the Chatham House Rule, anyone who comes to a meeting is free to use information from the discussion, but is not allowed to reveal who made any comment. It is designed to increase openness of discussion.
    • So, participants are free to talk about what was discussed but everybody's officially off the record.  Sounds like 95% of politics and 99% of business to me.  Why are you so freaked out about it?
and they dictate policies to american politicians. 
like what?  how?  Why do American politicians accept their commands?

The list of topics at the 2019 meeting. The part of the list they will admit to anyway includes topics such as artificial intelligence,  China, Russia. Only one of the topics listed mentions economics.  
AI, China, and Russia are all economic topics

Why are you okay with policy decisions made by secretive NWO groups like the Bilderburgers and the skull and bones society in a liberal democracy anyway?
Because the notion that Bilderberg is dictating US policy is laughable bullshit.  It's just a bunch of eurocrats trying to improve America's reputation in Europe.

Was all that shit about liberal democracy just you kissing the ass of the elite, hoping that when their agenda is complete they will award you?
no

You will not be rewarded for simultaneously praising democracy while being fine turning a blind eye to secretive groups who look to subvert democracy. 
How about I'll continue to praise democracy while I wait for you to produce a scrap of evidence to support your wide-eyed tinfoil hat credulity.


Topic's author
#18
Wylted
Wylted's avatar
Debates: 34
Posts: 5,754
3
4
11
Wylted's avatar
Wylted
3
4
11
-->
@oromagi
It's not really a conspiracy any more. The bilderberg meetings were considered a conspiracy theory as recently as 2015, when you guys said that it just doesn't happen, until people that attended them started admitting to it. 


  • Again, I'm ok with US presidents bolstering free market capitalism
That's not what they are doing. Now that is a retarded and unfounded conspiracy.

like what?  how?  Why do American politicians accept their commands?
I don't know why they do it. Perhaps they see themselves as being a part of an elite and secretive ruling class and they get off on playing God. 

Because the notion that Bilderberg is dictating US policy is laughable bullshit.  It's just a bunch of eurocrats trying to improve America's reputation in Europe.
Having secret meetings the public has been largely unaware of since the 1920s doesn't help anybody's reputation. 

It's not laughable to think that world leaders meeting in secret are making policy decisions together. What's the motivation for the meeting otherwise? 

AI, China, and Russia are all economic topics
Potentially anything is an economic topic. Stop being a smart ass. Nowhere do they claim or does anyone claim the meetings are economic. Even if they were economic (which they aren't and you pulled that assertion out your ass), it would still be disturbing that they meet and come up with plans to implement their New World Order.


#19
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,038
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Wylted
If competing nations are publicly saying you are doing a great job, then you know for sure you dun fucked up.
#20
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,038
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Wylted
Also if the USA is "democratic," why are the lobbyists that live and work in DC writing the laws instead of the state representatives?

Most of them don't even read the laws they sign because they are too busy reading the checks given to them by the lobbyists.

Watch this video if you still have a fucked up delusion that the common voter has any say at all in public policy. All backed up with a Princeton University study.
#21
Double_R
Double_R's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 5,279
3
2
5
Double_R's avatar
Double_R
3
2
5
-->
@Wylted
He essentially is threatening to send military grade weapons against dissidents who want a voice in their government. 
Biden is making the same argument gun safety advocates have been making for decades. It’s a *response* to those who argue that guns should be readily available everywhere as a means of fighting back government tyranny. Biden is saying that this is outdated thinking, and anyone who thinks they are going to overthrow the US government (which is exactly what planet Trump extremists want) are no match for the US military.

Why does this need to be explained?

#22
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,038
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
How about Biden actually fix problems instead of worrying what will happen to him and his buddies if they don't?