the double slit experiment proves consciousness affects reality even outside of the brain

Author: n8nrgmi

Posts

Total: 18
n8nrgmi
n8nrgmi's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,499
3
2
3
n8nrgmi's avatar
n8nrgmi
3
2
3
quanta act as particle when observed. they act as waves when not observed. doesn't this mean our consciousness does more than have interactions in our brain? this double slit experiment proves that our mind affects stuff outside of our mind. there's clearly something much deeper going on than "human consciousness is merely a function of our brain" 

this has spiritual or religious implications, arguably. 
n8nrgmi
n8nrgmi's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,499
3
2
3
n8nrgmi's avatar
n8nrgmi
3
2
3
"human brains produce consciousness and consciousness is limited to our brain" is a factually incorrect statement 
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,075
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@n8nrgmi
Things do what they do and we sometimes observe their effects, and sometimes we don't.

How would we know how stuff or the brain behaved if we didn't observe them?

And consciousness, as far as we are able to know, is.

And one can argue the religious and spiritual toss over anything.


So make a couple of slits and shine a light through them, and you will find GOD.....Yep that's another angle.
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
What...
Reece101
Reece101's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,973
3
2
2
Reece101's avatar
Reece101
3
2
2
-->
@n8nrgmi
quanta act as particle when observed. they act as waves when not observed. doesn't this mean our consciousness does more than have interactions in our brain? this double slit experiment proves that our mind affects stuff outside of our mind. there's clearly something much deeper going on than "human consciousness is merely a function of our brain" 

this has spiritual or religious implications, arguably. 
I guess it depends how hard one leans on solipsism. 
badger
badger's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,243
3
3
3
badger's avatar
badger
3
3
3
I used to understand this and I'm pretty sure there's nothing mystical going on, but either way

So make a couple of slits and shine a light through them, and you will find GOD.....Yep that's another angle.
This about sums it up.

FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,611
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@n8nrgmi
See:  The Double Slit Experiment Demystified. Disproving the Quantum Consciousness connection
            By Robert Lea

Let’s question for a second what we would expect to find if the double-slit experiment was repeated in a world in which the QC hypothesis is true.
An unavoidable consequence of the fact that we can’t detect or protect our experiment from incursions and interactions by disembodied consciousness is that we should expect that there would be occasions in which the wavefunction collapses for no discernible reason.
It would be as if we’d attempted to gather which way information with the later addition of a photon source and a conscious observer, despite us doing no such thing. If the QC hypothesis were true we would expect to see random wavefunction collapses. This has never been shown to happen. The results of the double-slit experiment are consistent. Researchers don’t record spontaneous wavefunction collapse.
It is that consistency that strongly implies that the QC hypothesis is incorrect in some way. Either consciousness does not exist separate from matter, or consciousness is not responsible for wavefunction collapse.
Or possibly both.
Ramshutu
Ramshutu's avatar
Debates: 43
Posts: 2,768
6
9
10
Ramshutu's avatar
Ramshutu
6
9
10
-->
@n8nrgmi
The observer premise of Quantum theory is solely that the process of making an observation inherently changes what is being observed.

In the double split experiment when observing the light as it passes through the slit disrupts the interference pattern, not because your conscious brain is somehow magic, but solely because interacting with the light in order to measure it, changes what the light is doing.

“Observer” in this sense is often taken wildly out of context by people who don’t grasp the nature of what it means.


Sum1hugme
Sum1hugme's avatar
Debates: 37
Posts: 1,014
4
4
9
Sum1hugme's avatar
Sum1hugme
4
4
9
-->
@n8nrgmi
The Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics is wrong because it incorrectly assumes that particles don't have mass until they're observed.
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,920
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
-->
@Sum1hugme
The Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics is wrong because it incorrectly assumes that particles don't have mass until they're observed.
To coalesce. Higgs boson field also key to mass.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1} There is no direct evidence of biologic life coming from where before there was none. Algorythmic games that combine, then divide may or not have much association with biologic lifes synergy { syntropic } attributes and its entropy { decay }.
.....I believe biologic life --in general--- is eternally existent and embedded/encoded in some black holes ---ergo on the event horizon---, and the various chemical elements in all or just some black holes and there event horizon.


2} When the fertilized inverts (>) itself to the of germination ---via gastrulation--- meso-derm, endo-derm and ecto-derm. The space-time torus inverts itself from two directions (><) ---from ultra-micro Gravity ( ) and ultra-micro Dark Energy )(--- with observed time { physical reality } sine-wave /\/\/\/ associated patterning inside the toroidal tube,  being the resultant. 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and there exists 18 quarks and 18 anti-quarks as basis for all hadronic matter. Leptons are also based on a trinary system.
....note: the 18 occurs 6th or 7th place depending on if we count, non-counting zero.


3} Thinking more above the above, the single inversion (>) of the fertilized egg leads to the chordata spinal chord and somehow this may be more associative to Direct Current{ DC } { only above or below th e line } electric field, whereas the diametric opposite inversions(><) of Gravitational and Dark Energy space, lead to the sine-wave { Alternate current/AC } field patterning 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 etc.

......1...................5p.......7p...............11p.........13p...................17p..........Outer Gravity
-
-
0.............................6...............................12.......................................18...top peak sine-wave inside the tube
..................3..............................9...................................15.......................bottom peak of sine-wave inside the tube
-
-
............2........4...................8.........10......................14..........16..................Inner Dark Energy.

This above pattern  has four overlapping hexagons

0, 1, 5p, 6, 4, 2
3, 5p, 7p, 9, 8, 4
6, 7p 11p, 12, 10, 9
9, 11p, 13p, 15, 14, 10
12, 13p, 17p, 18, 16, 14

Signance of cosmic fourness is many

Sum1hugme
Sum1hugme's avatar
Debates: 37
Posts: 1,014
4
4
9
Sum1hugme's avatar
Sum1hugme
4
4
9
-->
@ebuc
What is the point you're trying to make? This just reads like a word salad.
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,920
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
-->
@Sum1hugme
Many points unfortunately for you, you can not find any.   Try a dictionary to learn english for starters., I can lead you by hand for each line of text if you really having so much trouble with english language. 

Or maybe its just and ego base mental blockage on your part. 
Ramshutu
Ramshutu's avatar
Debates: 43
Posts: 2,768
6
9
10
Ramshutu's avatar
Ramshutu
6
9
10
-->
@Sum1hugme
He’s been doing it for years, no one listens to it; I’m hoping he just copies and pastes this stuff, because it would be sad thinking of him enthusiastically writing all this stuff day after day, post after posts, hoping someone will read it - but no one ever does.
Theweakeredge
Theweakeredge's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 3,457
4
7
10
Theweakeredge's avatar
Theweakeredge
4
7
10
-->
@Ramshutu
I tried to read it, but when I asked him to further explain it he just went on a rant about me not understanding english, he does that...
Sum1hugme
Sum1hugme's avatar
Debates: 37
Posts: 1,014
4
4
9
Sum1hugme's avatar
Sum1hugme
4
4
9
-->
@ebuc
No ebuc, you didn't make a point. And by trying to turn the criticism back around on me instead of answering the question, you're committing a Tu Quoque. So what is the point you're trying to make? Or are you just putting a bunch of random words together?
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,920
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
-->
@Sum1hugme
Or are you just putting a bunch of random words together?
Your ego based mental blockage is working overtime, and, is waste of precious mind accessing abilities. Sad :--(
Ramshutu
Ramshutu's avatar
Debates: 43
Posts: 2,768
6
9
10
Ramshutu's avatar
Ramshutu
6
9
10
-->
@ebuc
It’s not possible for you to be correct.

We all know that the inverted sine wave to rotated our of phase by 45 degrees into 4 dimensional space, 13 dimensional microgravity transmutes into 11 dimensional dark energy. The inverted Chalabai Yau toroidal force energy would expand exponentially into the meso derm micro evolutional energy, and end up twisting our collocate: cos wave energy pattern /\/\/\/\/, and inevitably prevent our matrix multiple resolving down to the root of Pi.

We can tell this because ...1....5....b....o...o....b....z....p83...r1.... in n dimensional state space of all the atoms vibrational energy.

Duh.
n8nrgmi
n8nrgmi's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,499
3
2
3
n8nrgmi's avatar
n8nrgmi
3
2
3
i think ebuc has schizophrenia or is at least otherwise mentally ill. i assumed everyone knows this, but it might not be common knowledge. incoherence is a common trait with the diseases.