My Subject Tier List

Here is how good I am at various debate subjects in my opinion.

Outstanding: Science, Computer Science, Technology

Reasonable: Economics, Education, Society

Mediocre: Politics, Morality, Entertainment

Bad: Religion, Relationships

How good are you guys at various subjects?

interested in your guys subject tier lists.

braveheart, you're using that word wrong, autonomous vehicles, other

Uh... I'm not sure - Id say I'm pretty good at philosophy, but you beat me in that one free will debate (which I lowkey still think I won, lol) - I'd say I'm pretty good at moral debates, see the countless I've done.

if sheep dies then you can have your rematch. Immigrants debate same side Challenge is still open. I believe my revised case is ever so slightly superior to yours...

Well that's not a rematch, thats just a debate with you - they aren't the same thing

Eh. I like calling it a rematch. Or the central bank one if you’re up for the challenge

Philosophy as opposed to pure Theology (I am an expert at this I would say, Zaradi beat me because he's also an expert at it)

Computer Science (Tech but not AI, more privacy stuff, cyber security, web development etc)

^ this is especially true for ethics and philosophy of  tech-based stuff.

Economics (but it bores me), politics (usually more political science and theory rather than law byt I am moderately good at the law debating stuff, it just rarely appears juicy enough of a debate to out my time and effort into.

Psychology/Psychiatry as well as Sociology (I always treat abortion debates as much more sociological than philosophical, regardless of which sode I take but definitely when on the pro-choice side and on this website I've never played devil's advocate on it but I can respect and understand the pro-life stance, it after all was how our species began to populate Earth).

I am better than most (but not an expert) at grinding elo at troll debates. I understand how to appeal to the audience but not fully so... It's my risky/rewardy way that rose so fast to #1 early on im the website's development (aside from winfarming vs Type1).

My weaknesses are extremely specific science debates or AI-specific tech stuff. Also, law itself, as opposed to politics is not really my forte. Stuff like Jury ethics, Judges, Cops, and clauses in law aren't my best suit.

I also am oddly skilled at debates about showbusiness, literature (fiction essentially). I've consistently been a formidable opponent even if I lost a particular debate on it, in my opinion.

I am mediocre at extremely detailed Theology debates.

probably social and technology