Abortion 2.

Abortion is a valuable social asset, and as such is a good and moral practice.

Only those that agree with this proposition, may contribute to this discussion.

Any opposing  A.T.  comments or intrusions or into this forum, will be reported.

Anyone that does not meet strict pro-abortion criteria will be asked to leave.

I am Pro-choice.

The strict "Pro-life" stance is contradictory, because ironically it is making the world worse.

Abortions can be done in funded clinics. Then if the abortion is outlawed, abortion will be done in messy illegal clinics which will make it worse, or a baby will be born and will feel like complete garbage because their parents don't like them.

If you don't like abortion, don't have one.

I agree.

I would never advocate abortion as best choice

But providing and allowing choice is good and moral.

Morally, I'm pro life, but I do not support legislation outlawing abortion

I'm curious on your reasoning; is it because you'd rather abortion by professionals?

Why am I morally pro life? My religion tells me it's a sin. That's enough for me 

Why do I not support outlawing abortion? Because people don't believe the same as me and to force religion onto others is a violation of the constitution. 

My ideal proposal? Complete privatization of abortion. Absolutely no federal funding or sponsoring of abortion clinics. 

Also why is this called Abortion 2? Is there a sequel to abortion?

Just wondering what an unopposed discussion is worth? Isn't that something like a mutual premature efactulation?

I think this topic is discussing "Why the pro-choice position is justified".

I get that, but zed is denying seeing any argument that it is not justified, isn't he? He doesn't want a discussion, he wants a fan base in a jerking circle.

Have you commented similarly elsewhere?....Or are you just a biased conservative?

I am not here, you have not seen me.

Yes.

It is a debate moved into the forums due to the massive amounts of back and forth questioning.