Now that you're behaving yourself, we can have worthwhile discussions. Albeit, *none* of what you said in *either* post about race and I.Q. is referenced. So, like your OP post on masturbation previously, your arguments here are sub-standard.
Brain size means very little when it is slight deviations. Albert Einstein had a smaller than average brain.
Thus, "very little" isn't accurate.
What means more is the way you were raised. If from the time your brain was easily malleable you were constantly fed Mozart, forced to play piano and violin, and did nothing but study astrophysics while taking an IQ test every 2 months... you could potentially be the next Einstein. That is true of any race. It just happens with Asians more frequently.
This is absolutely incorrect.
The last 100 years has produced a lot of studies on monozygotic twins, dizygotic twins, siblings, half-siblings and parent-offspring pairs, and more importantly, how whether they grew up in the same environment affected their I.Q. So, by comparing how similar I.Q. is when they lived in the same house (i.e. same environment), and then comparing that to how similar it is if they were reared apart, and then comparing their resulting I.Q's, behavioural geneticists estimate the I.Q. variation which is determined by genes and environment.
Therefore, out of more than 200 studies attempting to determine the environmental impact of I.Q, zero of them support your conclusion that "what means more is the way you were raised".
You definitely could make the case that Asians are smarter on average, just as white people are smarter on average than black people. But I don't know why you should.
I'll give you the answer: you should.
It isn't because of biology, and saying such statements is of no use to anyone. It simply fuels the egos of racists. Non-racists do not care and see no use in pointing it out.
Wrong.
To prove my point, take all high IQ people of all races together. What makes them high IQ? You will find a lot of similarities across all racial categories. Generally they are wealthier, have high education, play musical instruments, etc...
So, perhaps the more productive conversation is, how can we increase wealth and education for all people?
Do that, and you will see all IQ rates rise to the point of each race matching the other.
You haven't proven anything at all, nor have you provided any study to back *any* of yours claims.
Here, you've reversed cause and effect. Low I.Q's correlate with lower wealth and lower education. Sure, there is a feedback loop in that these lower I.Q's result in that person ending up in a worse environment, and thereby potentially further lowering I.Q. (because I.Q. is partially determined by the environment, but not nearly to the degree you suggest). But the low I.Q. is largely responsible for them ending up with lower wealth and lower education.
