As I said before, he only wants to stop sickos from mowing down 15 people in 30 seconds. The goal is to NOT to "prevent death", it is to prevent "unnecessary death". If you kill someone protecting your family, so be it. You needed your gun. You did not need an assault weapon. But to kill 15 with a single flick of your finger? THAT IS NEVER OKAY, unless you are in the military and fighting a war. Responsible gun ownership is all that Biden wants. No citizen should ever want or need that kind of fire power.
Again, if you’re wanting to keep one and not the other, why should the one that does less harm be abolished? Logically speaking, shouldn’t the one that does more harm get abolished? You saying oh their dangerous is true but it’s a red herring for the real issue: deaths.
I'm not going against science. Heaven Forbid!!! I love science (especially layman-level quantum physics)! I'm not suggesting a time when life begins. But I do know that it takes quite awhile for the tissue in the brain to even develop (not the brain stem which starts a little earlier). I believe in abortions in the first trimester --- under certain conditions --- incest being foremost among them.
You dodged. You and I can both agree that scientifically birth is either at conception or after exiting the mother’s womb. You’re in favor of abortion. By logic, you support abortion up till the third semester because the thing in the womb is not a human and therefore has no rights and therefore the mother can terminate the pregnancy.
Drawing from federal and state law definitions, the term assault weapon refers primarily to semi-automatic rifles, pistols, and shotguns that are able to accept detachable magazines and possess one or more other features. I, personally, care the most about the AR-15 type rifles. As for Sutherland Springs, that is a ridiculous example because the shooter wouldn't have been there if semi-automatic rifles weren't available to citizens. And if he had gone anyway, the death toll would have been much lower. And the guy who stopped the shooter was a firearms instructor -- not an average citizen. If not, I would have to ask, what was an average citizen doing close to a church, armed with an AR-15?
Thank you for clarifying. As you stated, banning “assault weapons” entails banning guns including handguns, rifles, and shotguns, so either Biden supports that or you don’t. If you don’t support that policy of Biden then you agree he is going to take away gun rights.
Now to Sutherland Springs. The guy who shot up the church wasn’t supposed to own the gun in the first place, but he got it anyways because the government sucks.
As for what the guy was doing with an AR, Texas is an open carry state, but if I remember, it was in his car and he got it and ended up shooting the perpetrator before he could cause much harm.
Again the question is why we should abolish something that comparatively does less harm. It defies all logic.