with the big obstacle intel out of the way, I believe MisterChris is going to win against Supadudz, based off previous experience. Thoughts?
Who do you think will win the DART tourney?
Posts
Total:
15
-->
@seldiora
“Out of the way” I lost 1st round.
-->
@seldiora
I would favor MisterChris, but it will be close. SupaDudz is a good debater. He could easily pull an upset.
What is it?
-->
@Danielle
Debaters:1. Intelligence_062. Speedrace3. SupaDudz4. MisterChris5. seldiora6. That1User7. Lemming8. Crocodile9.Nikunj_sanghai10. Dr.FranklinJudges:1. Ragnar2. WhiteFlameProctors:1. BearMan
A bracket-style tournament. We are on the final round after Whiteflame judges my round against Nikunj.
-->
@MisterChris
Cool. I consider myself a fair debate judge, so if my services are ever needed lemme know.
-->
@Danielle
duly noted!
Wow, someone noticing me for debating, an oddity if I do say so myself.
This definitely will be my hardest debate yet, due to the pressure and the level of which my opponents at, but I'm up for the challenge
-->
@Vader
"hardest debate yet"
*seldiora sad noises*
-->
@seldiora
I mean if you were in the finals in a sport, it would be one of the hardest games you played due to the pressure?
-->
@DebateArt.com
@Barney
A very interesting set-up, and selection of judges. I point specifically to Judging rule #1, and pose it to Ragnar: "Fact check every single contention." I'd like to know how debaters will contend a fact without offering a source, and how judges will fact check them without reviewing a cited source unless the fact happens to be common knowledge. Justify this rule as a judge in this tourney relative to Ragnar's judgment in other debates. I also point to the commentary on the typical debate argument entry page composed by DebateArt relative to the necessity of sourcing. Ragnar will know exactly to what I refer relative to judging. DebartArt might chime in, as well.
Just curious.
-->
@fauxlaw
Well, that thing has been replaced in the latest patch, I've rewritten it, not sure if for better or worse :/
-->
@DebateArt.com
Yes, but at the time of a certain debate, it was not yet changed, and yet you put your finger on the scale in that debate, making it a two-on-one debate. An impossible situation. Thank you very much. Excuse me if I was not amused.
-->
@fauxlaw
My apologies, I surely didn't have such intentions.