I'm wondering if inanimate objects should express evolution as do living organisms. The recent Twitter kerfuffle has prompted me to wonder if the powder-blue, sweety-tweety-bird image is entirely appropriate, given its new-found predatory nature. Shouldn't it evolve claws and a hooked beak?
Should corporate logos express evolution?
Posts
Total:
11
-->
@fauxlaw
*draws the Duolingo bird holding my family hostage*
21 days later
Well essentially you can draw a logo that used to be a single-cell organism a person.
Define "evolution". The current "evolution" we have is complicated pictures to inanimate color blocks.
-->
@fauxlaw
That would be great, yes definitely.
-->
@Theweakeredge
I'm working on a new logo for them. It's one of the things I do.
-->
@fauxlaw
Oh? Any particular bird that you're working off as a base? Or are you just going for a general predator?
-->
@Theweakeredge
imagine "alien" [Sigourney Weaver's nemesis] with wings
That's.... terrifyingly awesome. I love it, Im rooting for your logo
I'm wondering if inanimate objects should express evolution as do living organisms. The recent Twitter kerfuffle has prompted me to wonder if the powder-blue, sweety-tweety-bird image is entirely appropriate, given its new-found predatory nature. Shouldn't it evolve claws and a hooked beak?
Is this an argument against evolution?
-->
@Username
No, it's an argument against a business entity representing itself as a harmless tweety bird when it is a predator. A logo is a graphic mark intended to aid business identity