GN peeps
Naruto Mafia DP1
Posts
Read-only
Total:
786
-->
@MisterChris
So, I urge you two to call off the nuclear warfare... For now, anyway. If new evidence emerges, we can discuss... But I see little use in continuing drilling that rabbit hole further.
No, no, no! Stop using verbiage like this lol. That is an obligatory "lol" because I have to make everything I say seem light-hearted other wise it get's misconstrued as "Nuclear Warfare" or "Aggressiveness". I am not sure if you are reading the dialogue closely, but it's not aggressive or nuclear I promise. At least I don't see it that way, but maybe I am just socially mis-understood. This is a debate site right? To debate, two parties engage in discussion. If I dis-agree with something you say, I should point that out. That's part of the appeal of mafia! I feel like you guys see any long post or back and forth and instantly assume it's toxic. If you actually read through me and Speed's discussion, you'll see both of us agreeing in situations or conceding certain points. You got to get this visual of two people conversating as screaming at the top of their lungs out of your head lol. Not just you, everyone who thinks long replies = nuclear warfare. Maybe DDO was just different in nature, but most games had long discussions like this and I never usually thought of them as toxic.
GP is our best scum lead rn
hes been lurky asf the whole game an plus id be good to get rid of an inactive player
either way its a win
VTL GreyParrot
-->
@Speedrace
Meh it's not really a nuclear war now lol it's kinda simmered down into a friendly discussion of the rights and wrongs of playing mafia. Still think he's scum but I'm ok leaving it up to a cop or whoever. Very much want to lynch GP
This x1000. Beat me to it.
-->
@Pattern
haha
-->
@Pattern
Fair enough, I just saw that you two were arguing earlier and came back to see text walls that I didn't really bother reading. I just figured the situation escalated
twinsies
-->
@skittlez09
i dont think pattern is scum but so far hes proven himself to be unhelpful towards town an is wasting our timeVTL pattern
What do you consider to be helpful? I have given reads and contributed on nearly every page of this game. I make up over a sixth of the total posts.
-->
@Pattern
I make up over a sixth of the total posts.
maf
I have my suspicion of at least 1 scum but there is no way I can mount a case on DP1 against him. Tracking is the easiest way to check.
Grey said this earlier. May want to give him at least one day before we out him.
-->
@Speedrace
Because there were 12 players, so it had a perfect 9 to 3 town to mafia ratio. It's really unlikely to put 3-P's in games like those where the ratio is perfect
There's actually very few set ups where you can actually consider third parties balanced. You've probably noticed I rarely put them in games I mod, and that is why. They really only make sense in small game situations like 6 player counts, 1 maf, 1 3rd, and 4 towns. And mods should count them towards town numbers when factoring the win imo for best balance. All that aside, we have no way of knowing how a mod will design a game with thirds. Your own game, the one I wasn't lynched in, the balance made even less sense as it allowed for like 1 mislynch. Not shaming you for an old game, just pointing out that most mods don't really consider the balance implications when designing the game. They have a character that to them makes most sense as 3p and just throw it in and hope for the best.
This is what you sound like:You (mafia): Haha guys I'm third party rektttttTown: Uh that doesn't make sense because of the perfect ratio + behavioral reasons *lynches you*You: HOW DARE YOU LYNCH ME, I COULD'VE BEEN THIRD PARTY...but you weren't
The part with you quoting town? Yeah didn't happen. Supa is the only one who mentioned anything about numbers not making sense (again refuted above) and literally everyone else just voted.
For the investigating you stuff, sure lol. But the lynch was justified
If it was justified, I'd have liked to have heard why during the game, not after it ;-) Also supa was a hypocrite that game. In Stormlight he got mislynched dp1 before he even knew he had a wagon. He had a right to be pissed off there. But then went and did it to me in dp1 of the very next game. Remember he was "gut" reading me without a reason from DP1 based on a ridiculous argument (that was wrong btw) about mod psyching how roles were set up.
Supa: "Second, you seem to want to be kept alive, if you won already, you shouldn't care", "I have a strong time believing that justification at all. It just seems like a cop out fmpov", "Because I had a feeling your scum buddy was gonna try to drive the train away from you and focus on someone else. Furthermore, I think this is a gambit that you are doing to prevent yourself from getting lynched, playing the "third party" role. I have a hard time believing that was your motivation. I think you did that to prey on a noob. With GP, you were much more subtle and outted yourself in general", "Lunatic literally has no utility to town besides his "support." You don't even know if he's lying. ", "I still think your bullshitting this entire thing. It just seems to convenient IMO", "2) it's a 12 person setup, the optimal formula is 9v3, a 9v2v1 is a disadvantage.", "3) yes, but i believing you are lying just by behavior, and yes i am aware. i am saying you are lying",Did Supa have some bad reasons for voting you? Absolutely, but he had some very good ones too. The vote wasn't unsubstantiated in the slightest.
All of his "behavior" arguments were unsubstantiated 100%. Saying you read someone based on behavior and not explaining what that behavior is, isn't a behavioral read. It was a gut read. How do you respond to a gut read logically? You can't, and in general lynching people off gut reads alone is not encouraged the same way vigging people on them isn't.
"A guilty means you are anti town, whatever your role is. "He's technically right, the drafterman list cops 3-P who can win with town as innocent. I was too busy to say this in the DP. He didn't know that ofc but still.
Most mods usually mod 3ps as guilty as status qou, though I like drafters method. I think common understanding is 3p = guilty regardless of intent.
Also, warren literally says this: "For what it's worth I have [put third parties] in 10 player games before."
Which is what I was saying...
Also if I recall correctly, during one of the quickfires you literally said that we should policy lynch 3p's lol. I could be wrong tho
You're probably thinking of Pie. I'm generally pretty against policy lynches in general. I think the only one I've pushed is policy lynching troll behavior like greyparrots.
Also intermission, you said this in that game and I meant to respond but forgot but I was reading over everything and this made me remember: "Speed is a new mod, he literally asked me for help balancing his last game. And you... Well, how do I put this nicely?"New is a stretch, and just because I'm a new mod doesn't mean my style of counting 3p's is incorrect lol
Like I said, accounting for 3p's your generally gonna have badly balanced matches. That doesn't mean a mod is or isn't likely to include one in their games.
They agreed with his reasons. That's not a crime (although I'm sure there were some that voted with out thinking lol so you'd be justified for being mad at them)
People didn't say that. They just voted. You can assume they agreed with his reasons, but thats an assumption, and you know what they say about assumers...
...but you weren't, so this is a moot point lol
And you wouldn't have cared if you were wrong lol. That's even worse of a problem. That's "Bearman" logic. Bearman was lynching me in this game saying even if I was town he was justified. The mindset of "I'm not gonna learn from being wrong because I don't care" Is a slippery slope that leads to making repeat mistakes.
So this is really just you being mad that your gambit didn't go how you planned lol
The point is I would have liked to have been given the time of day and on almost any game of DDO I would have. The fact that players are too lazy to even care to think about why someone would or wouldn't do something and just vote on something based on face value says a lot about the current mafia community.
Clearly you did hear plenty of solid reasons as outlined above
Post game, not in game.
Totally different. In my game I literally said there was a 3P at the start lol. And the lynch would not have happened anyway because the factors that led us to lynch you in the first place would've been different (e.g., the ratio would've been acceptable for 3P, your attitude would've more closely matched your attitude when you were lyncher in my game, etc.).
The ratio was off from the start what you mean lol.
And if the factors weren't different well then you would've been lynched because logic pointed towards you being scum
But I wasn't.... OH sh1t see what I did there ;-)
-->
@Speedrace
Linking his is more efficient than typing out the exact same stuff lol. And the vote stuff is valid, just not allowed by the COC. As long as you can clearly explain the reasons if directly asked, you're justified.
To the bolded: But not many people actually do that. Both in debating and in mafia. I've asked multiple people to justify themselves this game. So far your among very few that have. Look at skittlez, I asked him to justify a read and he doubled down and voted me because of it. Btw I don't see you point to OMGUS at that haha.
I'm saying that whether or not it was anti-town is irrelevant because it's towny. And he did eventually explain his motivations.
Explaining motivations= not guilty?
If you become a cop I'd love to be your local robber.
Cop: "Sir did you just steal that thing?"
Robber: "Yeah but you see I really needed that thing, so ya know..."
Cop: "Ah okay, well now that I know your motivation I guess your free to go."
These are the facts:
Ousting doctors is bad for town.
Bear, not being brand new, should know this.
Bear doubles down and defends his action.
Bear never directly admits his mistake, but later in replies refers to it as a mistake.
Why does Bear have an excuse to do an anti-town thing? Would you let me get away with something like that?
I've read literally everything so try again.\
If you have, then you mis-understand what aggression is.
Looking back I think it was because you were roleplaying, the way you did it make you seem pompous and self-assured which caused an air of aggression, at least to me.And I should've said tunneled, being aggressive isn't inherently scummy
Pattern is a logic spren who doesn't understand human emotions, so I must have been roleplaying badly if I came off as pompous. There were certain points I was literally just qouting things from the book in situations where it humorously seemed like it fit haha.
OMGUS doesn't necessarily have to involve voting, it can be just general scum reading. You've scum read literally every person who has said something negative about you and a lot of them have given reasons.
This is objectively not true. Again, not every response to someone is necessarily suspecting them lol.
I've been in your spot multiple times, but I never self-voted, hence why you self-voting makes me think you're scum lol.
I don't usually self vote either, but I was feeling at a boiling point after the way the last few games have gone. And now I am genuinely more okay with the idea of a lynch of myself anyway. At least someone gave me the time of day and responded to something. Even though you are wrong, I am happy dying in circumstances where I got to say my piece and can confidently say it was listened to and reasoned with. I wouldn't judge you as hard in the endgame.
II'm very busy so linking Chris' post for example is just easier for me if I have to catch up on like 10 pages before going back to work. Next time maybe just ask "why are you voting me" instead of insta-scum reading someone
I asked you why you were voting me several times, remember? Your response to me was "For the third time, read this post" and thus the circle spins back around....
Also I didn't realize you were bald lol
Yeah TheFlyingSpaghettiMonster really had it out for me in the gene pool.
Going to bed myself. Night everyone!
-->
@Pattern
Good night, I'll respond in the morning lol
Greyparrot has still absolutely shown no link between Sasuke and tracker. He's rarely posted to defend himself, other than showing is role pm, which still gives no justification. I don't think Pattern's night plan would work anyway, because mafia could just leave them alone and have two NKS.
Anyway, VTL Greyparrot
Vote Count
VTNL [2/7] That1User, Chris
Pattern [1/7] Pattern
Speedrace [3/7] oromagi, Pie, Grey
Greyparrot [4/7] Speedrace, Water, skittlez, BearMan
-->
@Greyparrot
My mind is going over Grey's tracker claim.
The good thing is that it's testable. The bad thing is that it's not testable without outing power rolls (or at least who has them to be moving around at night).
Sadly I've only seen a couple random episodes of the show, so I don't know if the character fits as a tracker.
-->
@Pattern
Look at skittlez, I asked him to justify a read and he doubled down and voted me because of it.
once again ignoring the context but ok
i answered all of ur questions an gave u my reads if ur unsatisfied thats on u lol
also i didnt vote on u because u were asking me questions, i was voting for u because ur wasting time
-->
@Pattern
answer this,
how is hurling insults helping town? how is calling everyone lazy helping town? And how is bringing up past games beneficial? lol
-->
@Pattern
There's actually very few set ups where you can actually consider thirdparties balanced. You've probably noticed I rarely put them in games I mod, andthat is why. They really only make sense in small game situations like 6 playercounts, 1 maf, 1 3rd, and 4 towns. And mods should count them towards townnumbers when factoring the win imo for best balance. All that aside, we have noway of knowing how a mod will design a game with thirds. Your own game, the oneI wasn't lynched in, the balance made even less sense as it allowed for like 1mislynch. Not shaming you for an old game, just pointing out that most modsdon't really consider the balance implications when designing the game. Theyhave a character that to them makes most sense as 3p and just throw it in andhope for the best.
I added the 3P that game only because I had 13players instead of 12, and I can't recall anyone adding a 3P in a game with aperfect ratio. Warren even said he typically did them in games without perfectratios.
The part with you quoting town? Yeah didn'thappen. Supa is the only one who mentioned anything about numbers not makingsense (again refuted above) and literally everyone else just voted.
I said this because you specifically said that itwas Supa who was making you frustrated. I think you're justified about being mad at Cookie/skittlez but def not Supa. And I feel like every time you asked why you were being lynched, Supa was the first to respond, and no one else felt the need to elaborate further
If it was justified, I'd have liked to have heard why during the game, not after it ;-) Also supa was a hypocrite that game. In Stormlight he got mislynched dp1 before he even knew he had a wagon. He had a right to be pissed off there. But then went and did it to me in dp1 of the very next game. Remember he was "gut" reading me without a reason from DP1 based on a ridiculous argument (that was wrong btw) about mod psyching how roles were set up.
You did hear during it lol. And that's different because there was only a very little amount of time left in the DP and they were trying to lynch someone and they had already explained before that they scumread him. And some of his reasons were wrong, sure, but he also had a lot of reasons that were right.
All of his "behavior" arguments were unsubstantiated 100%. Saying you read someone based on behavior and not explaining what that behavior is, isn't a behavioral read. It was a gut read. How do you respond to a gut read logically? You can't, and in general lynching people off gut reads alone is not encouraged the same way vigging people on them isn't.
Behavior arguments are unsubstantiated by nature lol, that doesn't make them any less valid. I'm voting GP based on a behavioral read, in fact, the first time I ever lost as scum was because of a behavioral read. Behavioral reads are what set forum mafia apart from games like Among Us and Town of Salem. And just because you can't respond to gut reads logically doesn't mean people should never use them.
Most mods usually mod 3ps as guilty as status qou, though I like drafters method. I think common understanding is 3p = guilty regardless of intent.
Yeah you're right
Also, warren literally says this: "For what it's worth I have [put third parties] in 10 player games before."Which is what I was saying...
No lol this shows that he puts them specifically in games without a perfect ratio, that game did have a perfect ratio
You're probably thinking of Pie. I'm generally pretty against policy lynches in general. I think the only one I've pushed is policy lynching troll behavior like greyparrots.
Apparently it was me lol, and fair enough about GP
Like I said, accounting for 3p's your generally gonna have badly balanced matches. That doesn't mean a mod is or isn't likely to include one in their games.\
I agree, but I'm saying that 3Ps are still gonna be mainly in games w/o perfect ratios. Ofc they're gonna be badly balanced in the games they are in but mods are less likely to include them when you have that sweet sweet town to mafia ratio just right
People didn't say that. They just voted. You can assume they agreed with his reasons, but thats an assumption, and you know what they say about assumers...
I don't know what they say about them actually lol. And I disagree that people have to verbally (or whatever the equivalent of verbal is for typing) say their reasons when they vote, as long as they can explain why if asked
And you wouldn't have cared if you were wrong lol.
This is how this works: player A finds logical reasons to lynch player B--> they lynch B --> B flips scum
But what if they're town? A finds logical reasons to lynch B --> they lynch B --> B flips town --> per you, player A then "cares" that they were wrong, and by caring they beat themselves up for being wrong or whatever. But they can only beat themselves up if their reasons were illogical; but their reasons WERE logical, so why then would they beat themselves up? The reasons that they lynched you are true regardless of your affiliation, so either way they would've lynched you because the reasons for lynching you were present.
Think about it like this: you lynch someone because a cop investigated them guilty, and they flip scum. But in another scenario the cop is insane and guilties a townie. So you lynch the townie. Do you then "care" if you were wrong? No, because you didn't know the cop was insane, so you were justified in lynching the person in both scenarios. So as long as the reasons for lynching are logical, there's no problem.
So you saying this assumes that the reasons for lynching are illogical; but you've already agreed with me on my reasons, so therefore I shouldn't have to "care" if I'm wrong because my reasons were valid
That's even worse of a problem. That's "Bearman" logic. Bearman was lynching me in this game saying even if I was town he was justified. The mindset of "I'm not gonna learn from being wrong because I don't care" Is a slippery slope that leads to making repeat mistakes.
That's only true if his reasons for voting you are invalid, but you don't get to be the sole person deciding if the reason for a vote is valid, especially not if the vote is on you lol. If the reasons are valid then he has nothing to learn from.
The point is I would have liked to have been given the time of day and on almost any game of DDO I would have. The fact that players are too lazy to even care to think about why someone would or wouldn't do something and just vote on something based on face value says a lot about the current mafia community.
1. In that game Supa was the only one you were pressuring for reasons, so you can't get mad at everyone else because they were agreeing with Supa but were never specifically asked. Skittlez/cookie is really the only one who made it pretty clear that he had no real reasons for lynching you, and maybe water. Pie voted you before you claimed 3P and then was gone because he was busy I'm assuming.
Post game, not in game.
All the reasons I quoted were in-game.
The ratio was off from the start what you mean lol.
Huh? It was 12 players which is a perfect mafia-town ratio. Actually I think any multiple of 3 is a perfect ratio but I haven't thought about it enough to be sure.
And if the factors weren't different well then you would've been lynched because logic pointed towards you being scumBut I wasn't.... OH sh1t see what I did there ;-)
lol, and you were scum so what do you mean by "I wasn't"
-->
@Speedrace
Skittlez/cookie is really the only one who made it pretty clear that he had no real reasons for lynching you
i never actually lynched him when everyone was hopping on the wagon i voted for him later on cuz he was wasting our time ( still kinda is )
that being said i pulled my vote off of him cuz GP is our best lead rn
ill stand by my vote earlier but patterns acting as if i scumread him and was hopping on a bandwagon when all i did was VTNL an said that if i had to choose between him or u itd be him
-->
@Pattern
Linking his is more efficient than typing out the exact same stuff lol. And the vote stuff is valid, just not allowed by the COC. As long as you can clearly explain the reasons if directly asked, you're justified.To the bolded: But not many people actually do that. Both in debating and in mafia. I've asked multiple people to justify themselves this game. So far your among very few that have.
Everyone has, you just don't agree with their reasons
Look at skittlez, I asked him to justify a read and he doubled down and voted me because of it. Btw I don't see you point to OMGUS at that haha.
He voted you because he thinks you're anti-town
I'm saying that whether or not it was anti-town is irrelevant because it's towny. And he did eventually explain his motivations.Explaining motivations= not guilty?
I never said that; you said he didn't explain his motivations and I'm saying that he did lol
If you become a cop I'd love to be your local robber.Cop: "Sir did you just steal that thing?"Robber: "Yeah but you see I really needed that thing, so ya know..."Cop: "Ah okay, well now that I know your motivation I guess your free to go."
Nowhere did I say I town read him because he explained his motivations but funny analogy lol
These are the facts:Ousting doctors is bad for town.Bear, not being brand new, should know this.Bear doubles down and defends his action.Bear never directly admits his mistake, but later in replies refers to it as a mistake.Why does Bear have an excuse to do an anti-town thing? Would you let me get away with something like that?
Because mafia has every reasons NOT to out the doctor to town; hence, it follows that Bear must not be mafia. And yes I would because you're smart enough not to do that as mafia lol. Is it anti-town? For sure, but anti-town != scummy (there's a little coding syntax for you ;) )
I've read literally everything so try again.\If you have, then you mis-understand what aggression is.
Yeah I clarified further down
Pattern is a logic spren who doesn't understand human emotions, so I must have been roleplaying badly if I came off as pompous. There were certain points I was literally just qouting things from the book in situations where it humorously seemed like it fit haha.
Oh ok lol yeah I was like I really don't like this dude xD
OMGUS doesn't necessarily have to involve voting, it can be just general scum reading. You've scum read literally every person who has said something negative about you and a lot of them have given reasons.This is objectively not true. Again, not every response to someone is necessarily suspecting them lol.
I don't usually self vote either, but I was feeling at a boiling point after the way the last few games have gone. And now I am genuinely more okay with the idea of a lynch of myself anyway. At least someone gave me the time of day and responded to something. Even though you are wrong, I am happy dying in circumstances where I got to say my piece and can confidently say it was listened to and reasoned with. I wouldn't judge you as hard in the endgame.
lol
I asked you why you were voting me several times, remember? Your response to me was "For the third time, read this post" and thus the circle spins back around....
Fair enough
Yeah TheFlyingSpaghettiMonster really had it out for me in the gene pool.
lol tuf- see what I did there :-)
-->
@skittlez09
i never actually lynched him when everyone was hopping on the wagon i voted for him later on cuz he was wasting our time ( still kinda is )
You're right I went back and looked
that being said i pulled my vote off of him cuz GP is our best lead rn
+1
ill stand by my vote earlier but patterns acting as if i scumread him and was hopping on a bandwagon when all i did was VTNL an said that if i had to choose between him or u itd be him
+1
-->
@MisterChris
I think it's pretty clear at this point both Speed and Pattern are townies, but this nuclear war is still interesting to watch
Yah getting dat strong town vibe
-->
@Speedrace
Speed: Lets use town to check peole.
Also Speed: Let's kill off a town checker cause I don't like quiet people on DP1 who don't engage in theatrical DP1 drama.
-->
@Greyparrot
Speed: Lets use town to check peole.Also Speed: Let's kill off a town checker cause I don't like quiet people on DP1 who don't engage in theatrical DP1 drama.
No, because the only game I've ever played with you where you didn't insta-claim was when you were scum lol. And the one game where you lurked a ton you were also scum in. Sooooooooooooooooo
I'd rather investigate Lunatic than you
-->
@Speedrace
That's a niche thing on your part, and I got a lot of negative feedback about that playstyle, because it made the game no fun when people could auto detect if I was town or not.
-->
@Greyparrot
That's a niche thing on your part, and I got a lot of negative feedback about that playstyle, because it made the game no fun when people could auto detect if I was town or not.
Yes because you've always changed your playstyle according to feedback
Also your justification is garbage
-->
@Speedrace
Your comments are very negative for a Tuesday.
-->
@Speedrace
Also my justification is out of my control. You can take it up with Supa and blame him after you mislynch me.