Types of Debaters

You know those YT videos that do this? 

1. The Troll

The troll is the type of guy who is not even serious. Most trolls are either very religious, far-right, far-left, or a supporter of criminal activity. Trolls usually instigate or accept a lot of debates, which annoys mostly everyone who instigates the debate, but it makes troll farmers happy. Trolls don't care about their ELO or their place in the leader board. They are related to Troll Farmers, Semi-Trolls, and Forum Spammers. 

2. The Semi-Troll

The semi-troll is mostly like the troll, but is a little bit more respectful in their words. Semi-Trolls usually get temp-banned, and have more centered political ideologies. Most semi-trolls are appealed by rap battles, truisms, or easy debates. Semi-Trolls, unlike trolls know how to debate (not well though).  Semi-Trolls are related to Troll Farmers, Trolls, Rappers, and Forum Spammers.

3. The Forum Spammer

The name is self evident. These are the people who spam forums in order to get onto the top of the forum leaderboards. They are usually ignored but they like to seek attention. Most of the Forum Spammers reside in the miscellaneous forums, in which they race other forum spammers to have more posts. Like the Semi-Trolls, these people often get Temp-Banned.  Forum Spammers are related to Mafia Players, Forum Resident, Trolls, and Semi-Trolls.

I like your categories and the effort, it's just that you are not correct about ban frequency or being exact enough on the nuances. A semi-troll is something that isn't 'one type' in the first place. I will help you do this better later on if you are interested.

Alright. I appreciate your feedback on it. I'm interested in you contributing to his list.

i feel like im all three

Aren't you going to list the other types?

Alright

Rapper

Pure Debater (only debates good people, or people they are the same as regarding skill)

Tryhard (the guy that actually posts 30,000 or 20,000 long arguments, regards debateart as his/her job)

Mafia Players

Forum Residents (those who are only in the forum and rarely debate)

Ok-Guy (Ok at literally everything)

Pro (Good at debating)

Legend (The Best at Debating)

Mod 

The Ash Ketchum (Guy who actually is OK, and strives to push him/herself.)

Lol. The tryhard and Legend are the same guy unless we're thinking of different people.

Don't forget the conspiracy theorists

or the people who get made vote mod by doing nothing at all.

I think supadudz is a lot of them.

Pressf4respect is the kind of guy that can debate, but simply choose not to. What mix creates that result?

Semi-Troll x Forum Resident= The Lazy Debater

Who is that exactly?

PressF

What about me? I am prepared to get roasted. 

Ok-Guy X Tryhard X Student= Good Debater

“Good”... really???

Good not meaning actually good at debating. You are ok at debating, but your effort is something to admire. This makes you a good effort debater.

or the people who are not self-aware enough to realize why they weren't chosen, and so continue to pester someone that has done no wrong.  

Seriously, does every interaction I have with you have to be in the form of passive aggressiveness? I've never treated you with contempt. Show me some respect, and I'll continue to do the same. 

Go on, explain why you were chosen over me. Explain what the issue you have woth co spriacy theorists is and which members you were referring to. 

Answer those and you'll realise why I resent you. You only start polls to mock thise qho agree with the poll's suggestion, you're toxic and tbe little you've done on the site shows to me a very cold and calculating personality. Your profile description is designed to mock any who are confident in their descriptions.

I am pretty sure you are an all-round player. You can just do about anything.

An ironic description, a joke about conspiracy theorists and some polls where (if you actually read them) foster genuine discussion isn't grounds for resentment, and you know it. This all boils down to you being salty that I was chosen and that you weren't, which perfectly demonstrates why you weren't even considered as a candidate.

This has nothing to do with vote moderating.

You have yet to explain why you were chosen.

I couldn't tell you why I was chosen out of all of the applicants, but I can tell why I was chosen over you if that's what you're asking.