I can't debate every side of a debate brilliantly, but I can do it more than most for sure. My main obstacle is my own emotions, I just lose the urge to debate and need to push myself to keep at it or I just forfeit and/or get lazy with what I write.
My second issue is that I think much more logically and deep than the average reader, so what is a very weak vs strong point to bring up is so different for me vs the average voter and that makes it difficult for me to prioritise what to use the characters on in shorter character-limit debates.
One example is that I actually don't understand how anyone with a functioning brain can be right-wing unless they're a psychopath. The reason for this is so blatant in that right-wing ethos is inherently based on the wealthy mercilessly preying on the poor without restrictions. To me that point alone with no further explanation wins the debate but because most humans can't understand how blatant and undeniable that is, entire nations can have the right-wing one win. Even worse, they can have a right-wing party that calls itself Socialist winning and giving left-wing a bad name.