Why Are The Scriptures So Secrative, Evasive & Silent?

“At the last came two false witnesses,And said, This fellow said, I am able to destroy the temple of God, and to build it in three days”. Matthew 26:59-63. Just  who were these two dirty scoundrels who were more than prepared to bare false witness about  gods only son?  Why are they not named by the gospel writers? Why the silence? They give every other detail but the names of these two perjurers? .  

 

 

"There was a certain man casting out demons". Who was this other miracle worker that didn’t belong to the Jesus movement directly? Where did he get his power to drive out demons? What was his name? Why are we not allowed to know his name? Why was he working freelance? Mark 9 ;38

Then there was a unnamed “certain Pharisee” Luke 7:36

Why the secrecy? Why not name him?  What was the meeting about? Was this yet another Pharisee priest or member of the Sanhedrin council who couldn’t be named or even seen with Jesus? If so, why?

And at the same house there was a unnamed woman. She was crying and washing the feet of Jesus and drying away her tears with her hair. Why? What was she crying about? Jesus didn’t even ask her why she was crying and just laid back in a chair and let her get on with it without a care in the world about this woman’s sadness.

 

No one asked ;   `why are you doing that woman'?  This unnamed women just turned up, with a  jar of expensive oil on hearing that Jesus would be present at a meal.

There are neither reasons given nor explanations for this odd behaviour. Jesus seems to have expected it,there were no protestations from him about this crying woman in distress and obvious sorrow.. 

 This is more stalking and harassment.  And the second time I have warned you about it. 

I am glad that you can at least distinguish between what is only  a reply and what is a actual answer.

How would you know that I have read the bible that way?  You haven't a clue what I have read and how I have read it . And  for all your alleged  knowledge in languages, you still cannot explain  what happened to Lazarus after he was "risen". Did they catch up with him?  Was he crucified?  Did he go into a self imposed exile?

'

I do " GET IT". 

I get that this was a ritualistic symbolic "raising" from the realms of the metaphorical "dead". And the reason they wanted to kill Lazarus  was because Jesus had no authority to perform this symbolic ritual of raising Lazarus to the priesthood. I have made this clear on many of my threads. "raising the dead" is simply  the ritualistic  ceremony of being raised to another degree in the Jesus movement/ cult. This is besides the fact that there is another extra biblical gospel that tell us Lazarus was clearly alive when Jesus approached the tomb.

Put simply, and for the brain dead, anyone outside of the circle was called "the dead" AND to be among the "living" /  the Jesus moment,  one had to be "raised from among the dead" in degrees, i.e from water to wine.    This is the real reason why they wanted Jesus and Lazarus dead. And yes,  many did go over to Jesus as you say,  but it wasn't because of the "raising", they did so because John the  Baptist was gotten out of the way and probably by the Jesus movement? 

So don't tell me I don't understand or cannot read . The problem with  haughty sycophants  like you, is that you cannot accept that others read  these scriptures for what they really are;  that is, once the true meanings  behind these so called "miracles" are revealed , we are simply left with a power struggle. A power struggle for the kingship and the priesthood.  The Jews had a history of this in -fighting going back thousands of years and it went on right up until the Romans had had enough of it and the problems with the Galilean  Zealots in particular,  so they destroyed the one thing all these factions  were fighting over and had in common: the temple,  flattening Jerusalem in the process.  IN FACT!  the destruction of the temple had stared with with zealots who had taken it over by force and had barricaded themselves in. So do not suggest I am uneducated and ignorant, you haughty -  born out of wedlock -  person

You really are a haughty bellend aren't you.   

and you missed this>>  "There was a certain man casting out demons". Who was this other miracle worker that didn’t belong to the Jesus movement directly? Where did he get his power to drive out demons? What was his name? Why are we not allowed to know his name? Why was he working freelance? Mark 9 ;38

We are (eventually)allowed to know the name of a non-entity servant named Malchus who had his ear sliced off by  ‘I forget to turn the other cheek’  Simon, John 18:10 ,yet not allowed to know what should be  two of the most important names In all of the New Testament when it came to Jesus’ trial.

 

 Mark 15:40-41

40 " Some women were watching from a distance. Among them were Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James the younger and of Joseph, and Salome. 41 In Galilee these women had followed him and cared for his needs. Many other women who had come up with him to Jerusalem were also there" .

Matthew 27:56 does not name her directly, but adds that the mother of Zebedee's children was in attendance.