Why i block and who

Author: Melcharaz

Posts

Total: 37
Topic's author
#1
Melcharaz
Melcharaz's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 780
2
5
8
Melcharaz's avatar
Melcharaz
2
5
8
I will make a general explanation of why i block people, generally there are 3 reasons.

1: continual disregarding of rules. This can range from constantly going off topic on my threads, to the person doing direct attacks, fighting words or trolling and personal attacks to me, or being done more consistently to others.

2: religious views. This is probably the biggest reason, its not that i hate you or anything, you just simply disregard and/or mock my views of God. If there is a desire for you to learn about God, ill do what i can to help nuture that. But these people simply dont care about God and tend to do DA or PA against me (DA direct attacks, PA personal attacks) or use fighting words.

3: ya ticked me off, i got angry and blocked ya so that i dont make the situation worse. OR we just simply disagree too much.

No call outs and i probably wont respond to anything but direct genuine questions of when and why i blocked ya. 
Take care.


#2
Dr.Franklin
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 10,698
4
7
11
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Dr.Franklin
4
7
11
Was it because of our debate, i so sorry :(
Topic's author
#3
Melcharaz
Melcharaz's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 780
2
5
8
Melcharaz's avatar
Melcharaz
2
5
8
No, i block you because of your disrespect and your promotion of a false gospel, you and your friend is blocked for the same reason. If you ever want to know the real gospel, let me know.
#4
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,171
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
@Melcharaz

You block.

A. Because you are intolerant of alternative ideas

B. Therefore you only wish to preach rather than debate.

Millions believe in your god guy and millions don't....If you're going to participate in a global debate forum then you are going to have to get used to the fact that, alternative points of view abound.

Hopefully your behaviour is only indicative of a conditioned immaturity and not indicative of more an insidious intolerance.

#5
CaptainSceptic
CaptainSceptic's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 80
0
0
10
CaptainSceptic's avatar
CaptainSceptic
0
0
10
-->
@Melcharaz
Thank you for having the courage to explain why you block.

I now know that any topic you start will be heavily censored, through the construction of a defacto echo-chamber.

Thank you for the warning.
#6
Vader
Vader's avatar
Debates: 30
Posts: 14,984
5
8
11
Vader's avatar
Vader
5
8
11
-->
@Melcharaz
2: religious views. 
I think that's a bad reason to block people. Instead of blocking, why not try to talk with them about your views?
Topic's author
#7
Melcharaz
Melcharaz's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 780
2
5
8
Melcharaz's avatar
Melcharaz
2
5
8
-->
@Vader
2: religious views. This is probably the biggest reason, its not that i hate you or anything, you just simply disregard and/or mock my views of God. If there is a desire for you to learn about God, ill do what i can to help nuture that. But these people simply dont care about God and tend to do DA or PA against me (DA direct attacks, PA personal attacks) or use fighting words.
#8
PressF4Respect
PressF4Respect's avatar
Debates: 10
Posts: 3,159
3
8
11
PressF4Respect's avatar
PressF4Respect
3
8
11
-->
@Melcharaz
2: religious views. This is probably the biggest reason, its not that i hate you or anything, you just simply disregard and/or mock my views of God. If there is a desire for you to learn about God, ill do what i can to help nuture that. But these people simply dont care about God and tend to do DA or PA against me (DA direct attacks, PA personal attacks) or use fighting words.
Any examples?
#9
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,171
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
@Melcharaz.

Your views of a possible god are merely your views of a possible god.

Having an alternative opinion is having an alternative opinion.

Therefore disagreement is not mocking, but merely disagreement.

Refusing to accept that others have alternative opinions, is intolerance.

Preaching is for the pulpit, not for the debate forum.
Topic's author
#10
Melcharaz
Melcharaz's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 780
2
5
8
Melcharaz's avatar
Melcharaz
2
5
8
Examples? See post above this one
#11
PressF4Respect
PressF4Respect's avatar
Debates: 10
Posts: 3,159
3
8
11
PressF4Respect's avatar
PressF4Respect
3
8
11
-->
@Melcharaz
I didn't see any direct or personal attacks against you, nor did I see him mock your views of God. 

Please explain how that's an example of a block-worthy post.
#12
Crocodile
Crocodile's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 1,156
3
4
10
Crocodile's avatar
Crocodile
3
4
10
Yeehaw
#13
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
No call outs and i probably wont respond to anything but direct genuine questions of when and why i blocked ya. 
I do not ask you why you blocked me, nor will I block you in revenge. I respect that you blocked me and others, rather than be one of these 'only cowards block' fools. Block who you want and enjoy the website.

23 days later

#14
ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,875
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
-->
@CaptainSceptic
I now know that any topic you start will be heavily censored, through the construction of a defacto echo-chamber
How would his not responding to some, be censorship?
#15
Alec
Alec's avatar
Debates: 42
Posts: 2,472
5
7
11
Alec's avatar
Alec
5
7
11
I only block people that block me first.  This only happened once.
#16
Mharman
Mharman's avatar
Debates: 23
Posts: 5,620
3
6
10
Mharman's avatar
Mharman
3
6
10
-->
@Melcharaz
Blocking should only be reserved for those who follow you from thread to thread to harass you. It should not be used over a religious and/or political disagreement.
#17
Barney
Barney's avatar
Debates: 53
Posts: 3,465
5
9
10
Barney's avatar
Barney
5
9
10
From Melcharaz profile:
IF DART DOES THE FOLLOWING, I WILL RETURN.
1: INCREASE MODERATION.
2: NOT PASS RULES ABOUT TROLLING
3: BAN PEOPLE WHO VIOLATE RULES
4: BE ABLE TO BLOCK PEOPLE ON FORUMS
5: LET PEOPLE MAKE RO'S WITHOUT MOD APPROVAL
Until then i leave this place and will never return.

It needs to be said: This is a debate website, not a safe space where whatever you say will never be challenged.
#18
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Barney
If he removed:

2: NOT PASS RULES ABOUT TROLLING
I could understand his case with the other 4 requests, as he is consistently asking for the user to have more power to remove annoyance from their site experience.

However, when he asked number 2, I am confused what he wants.
#19
Barney
Barney's avatar
Debates: 53
Posts: 3,465
5
9
10
Barney's avatar
Barney
5
9
10
-->
@RationalMadman
It seems to be a demand to remove all the trolling rules from the site, which is directly against his previous opposition to changing the focus away from such vagueness.
He even insisted people should be automatically banned if anyone accuses them of trolling... So probably an accident in grammar, ending up saying the opposite of what he meant it to say.

1003 days later

Topic's author
#20
Melcharaz
Melcharaz's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 780
2
5
8
Melcharaz's avatar
Melcharaz
2
5
8
to clarify, there was a meep at that time that had to do with trolling. However, it ended up in a manner i was not happy with at that time.

I do believe people shouldnt troll others and insult others. but blocking and proper adjustment of javascript can make the words disappear.
#21
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
I'm just curious as to why you blocked me.
#22
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,171
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@TheUnderdog
Because they have issues which they are unable to deal with.

One can only guess that their formative conditioning was quite strict.

We must remain tolerant.

Though it is quite clear that they do read our responses, so their block is more a sort of defiant arrogance than an effective avoiding strategy.

In fact the whole blocking thing is pretty pointless really. Because blocking inevitably stimulates a response, and human nature dictates that the blocker is unlikely to ignore our comments.

And the religious debates will carry on ad-infinitum......... Well, unless GODDO pops out from behind a cloud one day doing happy-hands.
Topic's author
#23
Melcharaz
Melcharaz's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 780
2
5
8
Melcharaz's avatar
Melcharaz
2
5
8
you called God a hypocrite.
also, there are alternate ways of truely blocking someone, certain apps and webviewer and javascript manipulation can block out words and links on my UI.

#24
sadolite
sadolite's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,198
3
2
4
sadolite's avatar
sadolite
3
2
4
-->
@Melcharaz
Is your faith so weak it cant withstand debate?
#25
Reece101
Reece101's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,993
3
2
2
Reece101's avatar
Reece101
3
2
2
-->
@Melcharaz
Hopefully you don’t mock my god.

#26
Deb-8-a-bull
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,242
3
2
3
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Deb-8-a-bull
3
2
3
How do you block someone ? 

I'm sure i could probably find it but.

I haven't tagged yet. 
I done used The edit function. 
 
Id only block someone if they hurt my feelings. 
#27
Deb-8-a-bull
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,242
3
2
3
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Deb-8-a-bull
3
2
3
Its the help Center thing at the bottom hey?

Thats my guess. 

NO one has clicked on them things at the bottom. 
#28
Deb-8-a-bull
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,242
3
2
3
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Deb-8-a-bull
3
2
3
Instead of asking why you blocked me.  
I'm a guess. 
 You blocked me because, ,,,,,,,,,,,, your a blocker. 
You come from a long line of blockers. 

What would  a block function in real life look like.     
And if someone you blocked ( in real life )  tried talking to you. 

Imagine if real life blocking were like this. 
You can say anything you want but you just cant look at em 
#29
IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,541
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
-->
@zedvictor4
B. Therefore you only wish to preach rather than debate.
This is hillarious, I've just told him the same thing in one of his open topics eventhough he denied it.  I'm glad someone else thinks the same way, the dude is only interested in preaching his nonsense. And this is the first time I see your comment. 😆
#30
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,171
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@IlDiavolo
Yep, the guy has got crossed lines somewhere.

The clue should be in the name...."DebateArt".