What you described is a catch 22. How can you presuppose someone here is trustworthy if you admit yourself as not knowledgable?
Who do you consider trustworthy?
Catch-22 is a
paradoxical situation from which an individual cannot escape because of contradictory rules or limitations.
Trustworthy able to be relied on as honest or truthful
Paradox a seemingly absurd or self-contradictory statement or proposition that when investigated or explained may prove to be well founded or true.
Self-contradictory is the act of someone or something conflicting or going against itself.
Absurd wildly unreasonable, illogical, or inappropriate.
Investigated carry out research or study into (a subject, typically one in a scientific or academic field) so as to discover facts or information.
Explained make (an idea, situation, or problem) clear to someone by describing it in more detail or revealing relevant facts or ideas.
Prove demonstrate to be the specified thing by evidence or argument.
Well Founded based on excellent reasoning, information, judgment, or grounds
Seemingly according to the facts as one knows them; as far as one knows.
Illogical lacking sense or clear, sound reasoning.
Described give an account in words of (someone or something), including all the relevant characteristics, qualities, or events.
Reasoning the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way.
Logic reasoning conducted or assessed according to strict principles of validity.
Principals a fundamental truth or proposition that serves as the foundation for a system of belief or behavior or for a chain of reasoning.
Validity the state of being legally or officially binding or acceptable.
Conducted led by a guide; managed.
Assessed evaluate or estimate the nature, ability, or quality of.
Strict demanding that rules concerning behavior are obeyed and observed.
