Bloodline Day Phase 1

Author: Lunatic

Posts

Total: 586
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
hammer is not the only viable lynch for today @drafterman
Buddamoose
Buddamoose's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 3,178
2
3
6
Buddamoose's avatar
Buddamoose
2
3
6
-->
@Vaarka
Obviously my votes on Hammer. 

Vaarka
Vaarka's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 696
2
1
5
Vaarka's avatar
Vaarka
2
1
5
-->
@Buddamoose
I brought up your emojis thing before you claimed innocent child

at least I think you did. If you claimed before then I either forgot about it while making the posts or hadn't really thought about it yet

Who are we lynching? I'm seeing you and drafter going after hammer and supa/RM going for drafter
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Buddamoose
hammer isn't here to react to the pressure and out in time if a significant PR role.
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Vaarka
note that the 2 going after drafterman are both uncc'd likely-to-be-town characters; Sally  more so than Jane.
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Vaarka
in the people going after hammer, one is an unconfirmed innocent child and the other is a not at all outed individual who  has beeen shady and opportunistic all game from bwing me to bwing hammer.
drafterman
drafterman's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 5,653
3
6
9
drafterman's avatar
drafterman
3
6
9
Unofficial Vote Count

Drafterman (2/5) - Supadudz, Rational

TheHammer (2/5) - Buddamoose, Drafterman

Supadudz (1/5) - TheHammer

GreyParrot (1/5) - Vaarka
_____________________

Buddamoose
Buddamoose's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 3,178
2
3
6
Buddamoose's avatar
Buddamoose
2
3
6
I could compromise with Earth or Vaarka. 

Im not voting Dudz, I'm not voting Drafter..


Realistically ur prolly not gonna get a lynch on Drafter. Neither me nor Danielle will vote him. If you voted Hammer, then Danielle would probably shortly follow and we'd be at L-1. 

The same wouldn't be true of Drafter cause he's a strong TR to Danielle. 

RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Buddamoose
why are you not voting drafter?
Danielle
Danielle's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 2,049
3
3
4
Danielle's avatar
Danielle
3
3
4
I get that Vaarka's suspicion of me was predicated on me saying that I was going to watch TV. I understand that line of thinking (that I was making an excuse for lack of posting/analysis) which is why I didn't omgus FOS him. However I was concerned (as others have pointed out) that he's FOS'd 2/3 of the players in the game. He also said "my next prediction" was me and drafterman as scum, implying he wasn't even trying to actively scum hunt so much as throw out a bunch of possibilities. I don't see the point of that. Nonetheless Vaarka isn't really on my radar right now, and ya'll know I agree with his suspicion of GP.  

Also @Budda I realized that I forgot to write the word "though" somewhere in my assessment of linking your character claim with Supa's, which would have conveyed that I don't think you have to be on the same team. I agree it's possible that he's scum and you're not. I suppose the reverse is also true, but would appear less likely. 
Danielle
Danielle's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 2,049
3
3
4
Danielle's avatar
Danielle
3
3
4
-->
@drafterman
I'm not trying to start a wagon, as I said to Danielle, Hammer is the only viable lynch for today. I'm just discussing my results of analyzing Vaarkas posts, which you asked me to do, btw.
Why is Hammer the only viable lynch for today? I'm sure you said it earlier but I must have missed it. 

RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Danielle
He didn't say earlier. He is speaking about who will vote who out of the actives and being opportunistic.
drafterman
drafterman's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 5,653
3
6
9
drafterman's avatar
drafterman
3
6
9
-->
@Danielle
I mean it in a practical sense in terms of generating enough votes. Everyone else I think is split among how people read them. I don't know of anyone that TR's Hammer.

RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
I do not scumread hammer stronger than I scumread you and danielle. @drafterman
Danielle
Danielle's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 2,049
3
3
4
Danielle's avatar
Danielle
3
3
4
-->
@drafterman
My issue with hammer is he heavily FOS'd RM, but then ended up voting for Supa. Voting contrary to your statements has always been a scum tell for me. But now that I went back and through Vaarka's posts, I am beginning to FOS him more. I'm comfortable with a Supa/Hammer/Vaarka lynch, but Hammer is the only feasible one with the time remaining.
Oh, I guess you mean the bold. I agree that's sus but I was initially speculating on both players as well (they had a back and forth that seemed very contrived). Plus it seems that RM is just really easy to scum read in general. I'll look back on Hammer's posts, but not sure if I feel comfortable lynching him within the hour on a whim. 

RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Danielle
I am confirmed town and the only reason you scum-read me is your faulty brain.
Vaarka
Vaarka's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 696
2
1
5
Vaarka's avatar
Vaarka
2
1
5
-->
@RationalMadman
how are you confirmed town
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Vaarka
You're like a blind man asking how a colour confirms me as purplish.

Theme matters. I am uncc'd sally rayburn.
Danielle
Danielle's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 2,049
3
3
4
Danielle's avatar
Danielle
3
3
4
-->
@Vaarka
I explained earlier my reads on Danielle and Drafter were mostly gut (aside from her town reading him and me saying 'OH SHIT'). GP seems hardly active, making generic posts and not really contributing to the game. Doesn't seem like he's really trying to do anything specific and fly under the radar and I don't like that. 
Lol why would I out my one town read (drafterman) if we were scum buddies? That means if one of us were found to be scum, it would automatically implicate (as in yield suspicion on) the other. Use your head. If anything, as scum I would "town read" someone innocent in order to #1 gain credibility and #2 put suspicion on them when I flip guilty. So this logic just sucks in general. You shouldn't believe we're both scum based on my town read of him. That's retarded. 

Vaarka
Vaarka's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 696
2
1
5
Vaarka's avatar
Vaarka
2
1
5
-->
@RationalMadman
You're like a blind man asking how a colour confirms me as purplish.

Theme matters. I am uncc'd sally rayburn.

and who says sally rayburn is a confirmed town character
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Danielle
it's not retarded at all. It enables you to say the very thing you just said or him to say it instead when the other flips scum.
Vaarka
Vaarka's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 696
2
1
5
Vaarka's avatar
Vaarka
2
1
5
-->
@Danielle
Lol why would I out my one town read (drafterman) if we were scum buddies? That means if one of us were found to be scum, it would automatically implicate (as in yield suspicion on) the other. Use your head. If anything, as scum I would "town read" someone innocent in order to #1 gain credibility and #2 put suspicion on them when I flip guilty. So this logic just sucks in general. You shouldn't believe we're both scum based on my town read of him. That's retarded. 
Yeah I've started to think that, hence why I haven't changed my vote to drafter despite RM's... sound argument

RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Vaarka
Jesus Christ, this is why theme does matter.
Danielle
Danielle's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 2,049
3
3
4
Danielle's avatar
Danielle
3
3
4
Also @Vaarka why are you still responding to RM? I thought we agreed for the sake of the game to ignore him. 

He thinks claiming an un-cc'd character somehow makes him town. Everything he says is virtually useless and/or wrong. Please don't derail the game by playing along. 
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Danielle
No one agreed on that Danielle. No one except you with yourself.
Vaarka
Vaarka's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 696
2
1
5
Vaarka's avatar
Vaarka
2
1
5
But I also wanna keep an FOS on him because then I lose any reason to have an FOS on you and my gut says to keep an FOS on you

RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Danielle
I assure you if I am around d2, you will learn what happens to those who try to get me laughed at and ignored.

Vaarka
Vaarka's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 696
2
1
5
Vaarka's avatar
Vaarka
2
1
5
-->
@Danielle
Also @Vaarka why are you still responding to RM? I thought we agreed for the sake of the game to ignore him. 

He thinks claiming an un-cc'd character somehow makes him town. Everything he says is virtually useless and/or wrong. Please don't derail the game by playing along. 

aight
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
ok since people are agreeing to ignore  me, I quit this game, see you.
Danielle
Danielle's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 2,049
3
3
4
Danielle's avatar
Danielle
3
3
4
-->
@Vaarka
What do you think of Earth and Supa? I'd vote for GP today if we had no better options, but I think those two might be (especially Supa). Supa's behavior is weird/anti-town, but I can't tell if he's just generally a poor player.