Sessions needs to go. Could you imagine Gowdy as AG?
Gowdy would be a great AG from what I've seen. He's been on the house intelligence oversight committee for a little over a year, and he plans on not running for his house rep. seat next time around. Seems he might actually be in a prime position for the job.
Sessions hasn't been terrible, the main issue is he is doing jack all about any of this plain and obvious corruption and has had to be called out on it to even approve a grand jury. Basically, he's protecting the corrupt deep state, and that can't be happening. Gowdy would be on that shit like white on rice though, just like he was all over Strzok and decimated him when Strzok appeared before the committee.
Btw, what other times in US history have you seen the director of the FBI get fired, a lead investigator fired, and numerous other top agents landing themselves in extremely hot water due to clearly corrupt and abusive practices within the DoJ and FBI? People wanna say Trump paying off a stripper to keep quiet about an affair is bad... that's miniscule frijoles compared to.whats steadily being uncovered the more people dig into this.
Oh btw, the non partisan Judicial Watch organization? They already smell blood in the water, and have been on this for a loooong time, and they're not gonna stop until some people land in jail over this. It's beautiful seeing the walls close in on these snakes.
Btw, everyone is so focused on Russia, that the fact that Google executives sent emails ordering employees to do everything it can to get Clinton elected, the recent leaked video of their internal conference where they outright declared they would do anything in their power to operate against "oppression" aka "conservative viewpoints". Shadowbans, ratio'ing, etc. all proven extensively. It can't have meant actual oppression, considering Google is in the bed with China and helps the Chinese government to censor material and track citizens. Certainly clear oppression, yet they help with it. So as stated, oppression doesn't actually mean oppression, as has been the case for awhile, and as is evidence by the outted practices of these companies, it means censoring conservative viewpoints,
Sure, let's worry about fake news on Facebook, and ignore that Facebook, Twitter, Google, the lot of these giant tech companies, were, and continue to do far more to interfere with elections and the political discourse than faked news articles ever will. But of course, as always with Leftists, corruption and censorahip is ok so long as that corruption and censorship favors their viewpoints. But, listen for the buttholes puckering, because the EU, US, and Canada are already moving on removing the exemption these companies receive from publishing tort on the condition they operate as open forum. The banning of Alex Jones tipped the scales on that one and forced legislators hands. The hammer is coming in the form of a wave of lawsuits that potentially will bury these companies. Cause once the exemptions are removed, everyone and theirom can sue them for defamation stemming from any particular individuals post. Want to act like a publisher, prepare to deal with the law like a publisher does, and that means getting ready to open up ur pocketbook for spanderous and libelous content 😂😂