1. Drafter participates in a self admitted bad strategy of claiming with no pressure
Drafter has openly criticized the act of claiming without very much pressure or none at all. In fact this ended up being one of the major reasons he psuhed a lynch on SA in the office, and in dark crystal it was a point of critic for the town from him about how all the vanillas claimed early and made it obvious as to who the power roles were. When questioned about why he claimed, he is now saying that it is "status qou".
Except is the status quo. We're in a game were, in DP1, unprompted, the doctor/watcher, cop, and dreamer all claimed.
First of all, I don't think it was every unanimously established and agreed upon that claiming without pressure is status qou. Second, look at the people who claimed lol. Greyparrot is hardly one to be surprised about doing something silly and un-predictable in a mafia game, we now know Speed was just doing it as a gambit to bait the nk, and he was suspicious of singularity (and GP at this time for that matter), so out of the three people he mentioned that did it with no pressure, he suspected two of them at the time, and the other was lying. It's more likely he claimed early out of panic, or hope that it would give him town cred, given bullish was the only one pushing his lynch at this time.
2. The hypocrisy of his toaster defense.
I'll preface this by saying this is a point that drafter continues to ignore, and I think it's because it's one of the one's that implicates him heaviest. On christmas day, less than two weeks ago, he made the statement: This is a common refrain. An active town will eat itself in the presence of inactive scum. Inactives should always be pressured. The fault lies in Supas complete and utter overreaction as well as the veterans (myself included) that allowed ourselves to get distracted by it. I remember thinking Supa was town, but ultimately just got fed up with his behavior and actually forgot about my town read.
But now in DP2 he defended irontoaster's inactivity, as if his inactivity wasn't enough to lynch him. He continuously brought up that I should be lynching him instead (which you can see how well that's been going so far, as I've been literally trying since the start of the DP3), and that toaster was obviously town. He went as far as to say that the people who wagoned the toaster lynch were idiots for not seeing it. Why is that? What had toaster done that was so townie? He made 4 posts DP1 and when he finally responded in DP2 to the pressure, all he did was OMGUS the people pushing him for inactivity, despite being apologetic about it in DP1. Drafter had no reason to think toaster was town, and statements he made saying he knew he was town, only implicate him further. He could only have known toaster was town, if he was indeed scum, and it appears he is using toasters flip as a weapon, which is the same scum tactic that I caught warren42 with in Virtuoso's mafia game.
