SupaDudz: 276 Likes
PressF4Respect: 273 Likes
The Like King is here! mwahahaha
PressF4Respect: 273 Likes
The Like King is here! mwahahaha
I like people's post and I know I have liked your points. Usually I respond with a "true and correct"I am more willing to like your posts than you are to like my posts
Did you ever consider that may be how you won? With others in the same relationship between you and their liking?
And his list is nothing when he puts Dr.F, the king spammer that spammed 3k posts and was banned for spamming as a "must read member"
And his list is nothing....
RM thinks that it has some validation or is an official list or something
...there are flaws to the list
RM thinks the list is an heirachy list,
I don't care about being on a list or what not.
I have an opinion on the validity of the list and personally I don't think your list is great...
and I used the example of DrF. Also by nothing, I mean an exxagerated version of "not good or flawed"
The list would then be called "Utter bullshit because I am not on it."
No. I never said specifically stated that I was mad I wanted to be on the list in the first place. It was pointing criticisms to your list which I then found the list badLol. OK. But your behavior on this thread belies that claim.
A personal read list can only have validity or be "great" for its creator. Your opinion of its validity or greatness is illogical. Perhaps you are confused about the concept.
How another person's personal tastes can be "not good or flawed" for you escapes me. You liking or not liking it does nothing to its greatness or validity.
Like you're contending right now. Lol. OK dude
But you claimed RM would do exactly that were he not on it. I think the same of you.I am not calling it bullshit cause I am not on it.
I know. I didn't say you did. I said you slandered RM.And I am not slandering you for your list.
From your behavior on this thread so far, I would think he has a point.He also likes to say I never deserved a position at all and things like.
...when you talk about people on a site, you are bound to have your disagreements, especially on a debate site
..and just sad your list was not good lmao
I know. I didn't say you did. I said you slandered RM.
From your behavior on this thread so far, I would think he has a point.
So you "disagree" with who I find interesting to read. You think I should not find Dr. Franklin interesting, and think your opinion somehow invalidates my liking his posts. It's amazing how you cannot see how ludicrous that position is.
If you have a different list, make one of your own dudz. Mine doesn't have to agree with yours. And my list is not validated by whether you like it or not.
My list was perfect for me. It has all the people I like to read. How is that "not good"? A list that did not have my favs would be "not good".
You think my list has to be good for you for it to be good. But then it wouldn't be my list now would it?
You obviously dislike Dr. Franklin and RM, and are letting your hate cloud your good sense. My opinion is that both of them consistently make better posts than you.
But it's has been nice to know my list didn't meet your approval. Luckily for me, my list is supposed to contain the posters I like, and not the posters you like. That is what makes my list "good" for me.