True but you may have found word metaphysical. Start there. DId you do that?
Sure, but you didn't write "metaphysical" you wrote "metaphysical-1".
Now see if you see and any enumeration ex 1, 2, 3 etc that correlate to more than one defintion of the word. Are there any?
Yep.
It does not take a PhD o grasp that metaphysical-1, is a diffferrent definition from metaphysical-2, or 3 or 4 etc. Enumeration for differrent definitions of same word are very common in dictionarys.
In dictionaries, yes. In colloquial speech, no. It is not reasonable to expect that someone would understand that this is what you would mean. Also, not all dictionaries number their entries in the same order. But, given your explanation, let's go with that:
And now let's put that into context:
"It is matter { feelings/nervous system } over of or relating to metaphysics, mind/intellect/concepts and morals."
Nope, still doesn't make sense to me.
Also Ive clearly laid -out in this thread and many other what I mean when use that text as presented.
Sorry, but I haven't developed the happen of going through all of your posts to cobble together the key necessary to decipher your code. Perhaps if you dislike repeatedly explaining yourself you could just speak more plainly?
Here is again metaphsyical-1, mind/intellect/concepts and morals.
Gibberish. Makes no sense even with the guidelines you've presented.
Hopefully you can be man, or woman enough, to play fair and address the specifics of comments as stated and not irrelevant ego based mind games.
I'd love to address your comments... if I knew what they meant. Your statements may make sense to you, but they don't make sense to anyone else. And if you think you're writing clearly and plainly, I guarantee you would not be able to decipher the meaning of any one else if they wrote similarly.
