i find this interesting could another 911 be done under trump.
911 predictive programming
Could another 911 event be done under trump
Posts
Total:
37
-->
@crossed
you find that interesting? what or who could prevent another 9-11? you do know planes from other countries have been hijacked right? How about the one where the pilot flew it right into the mountain? Get some help for you TDS
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
It's my firm belief that "9/11" was staged much in the same manner as Pearl Harbor and the sinking of Lusitania. If History has taught us anything, it's that man does not go to war "out of good will," but over resources. Man just needs the proper pretext.you find that interesting? what or who could prevent another 9-11? you do know planes from other countries have been hijacked right? How about the one where the pilot flew it right into the mountain? Get some help for you TDS
Yes
Pearl Harbor staged, Really??It's my firm belief that "9/11" was staged much in the same manner as Pearl Harbor and the sinking of Lusitania.
-->
@Athias
above
-->
@Athias
Except WMD was the fake reason to go to war, not 9-11
-->
@Greyparrot
@Dr.Franklin
Pearl Harbor staged, Really??
Yes.
Except WMD was the fake reason to go to war, not 9-11
Weapons of mass destruction was the pretext of the Iraqi War, which was an extension of the Afghanistan War--the pretext being 9/11.
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
He would most likely allign with Trump and TDS is either an insult and ad hom or a medical condition.
What is TDS?
-->
@Athias
Pearl harbor wasn't exactly staged. The military left it open and lightly defended as bait for the Japanese.
-->
@Greyparrot
Semantics.Pearl harbor wasn't exactly staged. The military left it open and lightly defended as bait for the Japanese.
-->
@Athias
how
-->
@TheRealNihilist
it's all 3
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Franklin Delano Roosevelt knew in advance that the Japanese were going to attack because he had received information on as much just two days before. FDR also knew that it would be Pear Harbor because of its location, not to mention the large Japanese settlement in Hawaii.
-->
@Athias
So? Thats not staging
-->
@Dr.Franklin
So? Thats not staging
Semantics. They knew it was going to happen; they wanted it to happen; and they let it happen. Not to mention their "sponsors" were the same people.
-->
@Athias
Its not semantics, we arent debating, They never wanted it to happen, they knew they would strike, not just where and "sponsors" like what
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Its not semantics, we arent debating, They never wanted it to happen, they knew they would strike, not just where and "sponsors" like what
Yes, they did want it. Because they wanted to enter World War II; they just needed the pretext. And their sponsors were willing to finance it.
-->
@Athias
Sponsors wanted Nazi's in, Henry Ford had a picture of Hitler on his desk,they saw war against Hitler has bad, and working with The Economic Powerhouse in Germany was good. Entering WW2 because of Pear Harbor is fine, ALso it's not staging
-->
@Dr.Franklin
That wasn't the reason for the War. The War itself was a pretext for a consolidated international governing body which they had tried and failed before, known as the League of Nations--now known as the United Nations--and the establishment of the International Monetary Fund, which is nothing more than a global hedge fund.Sponsors wanted Nazi's in, Henry Ford had a picture of Hitler on his desk,they saw war against Hitler has bad, and working with The Economic Powerhouse in Germany was good. Entering WW2 because of Pear Harbor is fine, ALso it's not staging
-->
@Athias
what a joke, the UN is for making sure no world war happens
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
oke doke.
-->
@Dr.Franklin
what a joke, the UN is for making sure no world war happens
The purpose of the United Nations is global governance; the act and threat of world war were merely part of a dialectic, which brought about the U.N.'s creation. The same figures who sponsor the U.N. are the very figures who sponsor/sponsored the very wars the organization "intended" to prevent. But feel free to do your own research; I presume the resources are available to you.
-->
@Athias
What is hilarious are the people who sit on the human rights council. Their idea of "world peace" is to wipe Israel off the map.
I dont see any possibility like 9/11 could happen again within the next 20 years, let alone within Trumps term.... 9/11 first happened in part because the US was so unaware of how dangerous it could become. You could bring almost anything you wanted to on a plane, you could walk right into the cockpit without anyone doing anything, you could coordinate with other plotters with almost zero chance of getting thwarted, the US simply wasnt set up in a way to be on the lookout for coordinated attacks.
Nowadays though, America is arguably more coordinated to detect possible threats compared to any other country in the world. Subways and airports are heavily monitored, stadiums dont allow you to bring in nearly anything, suspicious telecommunications are examined to an almost infinite extent, FBI sends SWAT teams after anyone they have a decent amount of evidence against.... Even power grids and electrical systems are built-in with protections to prevent against hacking or some sort of EMP type of event..... 9/11 was such a wakeup call the first time it happened that the US is now hyper vigilant against anything that is even a fraction of what 9/11 was in terms of damage.
MAYBE technology continues to advance to the point that a handful of people could wage cyber-warfare on a nation with particularly weak defenses, but currently that time is still off into the future, and the only entities capable of carrying out cyber attacks against a country the size of the US are other enemy nations with the capacity to operate such a campaign. China, Russia, and North Korea come to mind. The chances that a random terrorist organization though or any group of people can pull off such an attack, against the US, is just not feasible currently and in the immediate future.
Our security was not flawed. They just used that as an excuse to put more control over us.
-->
@Greyparrot
trying to pull from memory, but I seem to recall sometime around 1976 Israel had a plane hijacked and after that they reinforced their cockpits and other security measures. We did the same after 9-11. Why we didn't follow suit way back then, well we can speculate.
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
Because we felt nobody would be stupid enough to fuck with America.
-->
@Greyparrot
that and they didn't want to spend the money for the upgraded securities.