That's the question, have fun.
Who beluieves that a "god" blew on clay and created man?
Posts
Total:
42
-->
@disgusted
.
disgusted,
To completely understand your question, what does "beluieves" really mean because I couldn't find that word in the dictionary?
I got the second part of your question, "blew on clay and created man," which is biblically wrong, where we didn't expect a Hell bound Atheist like you to quote the Bible correctly, LOL! Whereas this scenario is to be quoted as; "Then the LORD God formed a man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being." (Genesis 2:7).
As you can see, your bible knowledge goes severely wanting once again in your embarrassment, this is because it was not clay, but dust, and where Jesus did not blow upon clay, but into the nostrils of man after he was formed from dust. It is beneficial for the Atheist to know what they are truly talking about before they need to remove one foot to insert the other, understood?
You are excused once again in total embarrassment, whereas when you admit to your ineptness regarding the Bible, and redo your statement to be correct, then TRUE Christians will address your post.
.
-->
@disgusted
do you believe science, right now could make a protein shell and place within it RNA which essentially would be a virus?
this imo would be the first step in creating more advanced life forms which will be possible as science advances. I think it would be possible to create a human being from scratch when technology develops enough. We figured out a while ago you don't actually need sperm to fertilize an egg, all you need is the actual genetic material, DNA to do it.
It's conceivable that if there is a creator, intelligent designer creating life would be a small feat compared to creating reality as we know it.
91 days later
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
In your paradigm clay=genetic material. woo hoo.
Well yes .
God could in fact make a man from clay. I will except this claim.
However God had NO POSSIBLE way of knowing that clay needS to be fired.
Not even God himself can skip the long drawn-out process of firing.
firing a man size lump of clay,
back in the day.
Your looking at over 6 days.
What i think that has happened here is overtime the translation for this has got blurrd.
Andddd If i know the Christian flavored Gods like i think i do.
It would of went something like this.
God made adam from HIS rib.
And adam then plssed in the dirt and made eve from the wee wee mud.
-->
@BrotherDThomas
So where did the Lord God get his oxygen from prior to the creation thing.The Lord God breathed.
What's with the dragging up of topics that are months old?
-->
@disgusted
Dee dee answered you bully. And you promptly ran away. Why?
Worse, you keep repeating the same incorrect question to other threads.
Do you have a reply for him? A comment on your error concerning the verse? Anything?
-->
@ethang5
Who?
At least try to be coherent.
Post #2 in this thread genius.
-->
@ethang5
I don't recognise that and didn't read it, unfortunately for you you did. But that's your level.
-->
@disgusted
Lol!! It's YOUR thread Jethro! You didn't read the 2nd post to your own thread? The first post by a member to your own thread?
Yes bully. Reading is my level.
-->
@ethang5
I see comprehension of the written English language still isn't though.
-->
@disgusted
And post #2 still sits there showing your ignorance on the very topic you made a thread about.
-->
@disgusted
It's believe, not beluieves. Also, the look into the Hebrew word "bara" ever more. Because, it doesn't always mean created.
-->
@ethang5
You regularly have nothing to say and prattle meaninglessly anyway.
-->
@Dynasty
Ooh please, please don't attack my typos, I'll be devastated you you you. lol
-->
@disgusted
I checked. Post #2 is still there. Unaddressed and Unanswered.
-->
@ethang5
What? WOW. Keep reading your fellow godists, remember; they are on your side little thang.
-->
@disgusted
I checked. Post #2 is still there. Unaddressed and Unanswered.What?W
What?
If you can count to two, you can find the second post to your thread.
it was not clay, but dust, and where Jesus did not blow upon clay, but into the nostrils of man after he was formed from dust.
Ouch! No wonder you're pretending to have not seen it.
-->
@ethang5
I don't read any of your leader's (brother something) posts, you are the only one dishonest enough to pretend.
Oh BTW your great book of lies and other fairy tales never mentions some Jesus blowing into clay nostrils, whatever they are. LOL
-->
@disgusted
I don't read any of your leader's (brother aasomething) posts,
Lol. You obviously don't read the bible either.
You might want to be less ignorant on a subject you plan to post about the next time you create a thread.
whatever they are...
Lol. Yeah. Whatever.
-->
@ethang5
Your the one who claims your great book of bullshit says that Jesus blew in a clay nose, not me.
You're a funny little fellow.
-->
@disgusted
When you read it, you'll see why your reputation is the way it is.
Clay. Lol
-->
@ethang5
"Jesus" lol. Have you got a bible passage that supports your claim?
-->
@BrotherDThomas
You cannot see the very air that you breathe. Yet you wonder where the source of your very soul came from. Think about that for a change.
Yap, yap, yap!
I believe it's spelled believe
-->
@zedvictor4
.
zedvictor4,
YOUR IGNORANT QUOTE, POST #6 : "So where did the Lord God get his oxygen from prior to the creation thing."
Our Hebrew Yahweh/Jesus God has always existed in the form that is shown within the scriptures, therefore, He had the ability of oxygen. (Pslam 90:2). Hint: we were created in our God's image, therefore, Yahweh Jesus has a penis and a butthole. "So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them." (Genesis 1:27)
.
-->
@BrotherDThomas
Thanks for responding.
You are man quoting man. Not man quoting a god.
Simply saying that because an assumed god must have existed therefore there must also have been air to breathe, doesn't really cut the mustard these days in terms of evidence based proof.
And you simply requoting such archaic, illogical information/stories, is what it is.
It's far more logical to assume, given what we actually know, that men created these particular versions of gods in their own image.
Hence the "Penis and the Butthole".
And I suppose that women didn't get much of a look in back in the day.
So therefore, no vagina.