Mostly because the rights of citizenship begin at birth.
Doesn't mean that right is just or should be upheld. Do you have something more to go on?
I'm pretty certain they call themselves "pro-choice". Nobody is advocating for mass abortions. Nobody wants people to have abortions.
They are simply arguing that it should be an option. It is an unpleasant choice that is less-bad than many of the alternatives.
Clearly semantics or I don't know you are triggered by some framing. I am pretty sure that the majority democratic stance is if they need an abortion then they should have it which goes for every single abortion occurring right now and in the past.
The Supreme Court’s decision finding a right to privacy arose in a 1965 case involving the right of a married couple to use contraception called Griswold v. Connecticut. But the right has become responsible for court decisions supporting adult rights to sexual intimacy, to gay marriage, and to the rights of parents to make family decisions, such as whether their children are home-schooled or go to religious schools. The right to privacy also supports an adult’s right to decide their medical care, and an adult’s right to die, by rejecting medical care in certain circumstances. This medical care area also implicates the rights and autonomy of the physically disabled and the mentally ill. Further, the right to privacy can support artificial insemination. And transgender individuals have used privacy to argue that schools cannot ban them from certain bathrooms, and that government must generally support their gender identity choices.
Where was the part that being against abortion impacts this again?
Most miscarriages are preventable. (IFF) an embryo is a citizen (THEN) a preventable miscarriage is manslaughter.
Any evidence?
The definition states: the spontaneous or unplanned expulsion of a fetus from the womb before it is able to survive independently.
So if you were proving anything you would be proving that it wasn't a miscarriage instead was intentional fetus killing or something.
It does not really matter whether a woman is pro- or anti-abortion. In states like Tennessee, with its freshly passed anti-abortion amendment, you can be arrested for having a miscarriage.
Am I supposed to be for this or something? I am not given the definition that is "spontaneous" or "unplanned". If a miscarriage is preventable it is not a miscarriage.
An alarming number of women are being arrested, prosecuted and jailed just for losing their pregnancies. In addition to anti-abortion measures, you can thank the advance of “personhood” fights for embryos, fetuses and even fertilized eggs for that.
Guess more filler. What were you trying to show with this again?
Being anti-abortion = anti patient-doctor confidentiality.
If I said I was going to murder a bunch of people to a therapist and carefully laid out how I would do it. Are you telling me the therapist would not speak to the proper authorities regarding what I just said?
You would have to demonstrate how anti-privacy in this specific context is more valuable than a life either by showing a fetus isn't a life or anti-privacy is more valuable.
What happens inside a woman's body (sovereign territory) is her business.
What do you consider sovereign territory?
Why should what she want be valued more than what is inside of her?
Please provide an example of something that happens inside a woman's body that is NOT her business.
An abortion. It requires the business of lets say planned parenthood given the authority to do so by the government. Her business is only granted by the state. She wouldn't have it without the state and even if the state gave her the right she still has to use the facilities given by the government to commit to an abortion. If it was her business she wouldn't need the government to make it happen but she does.
Are you assaulting or murdering a person in a foreign sovereign territory?
Fetus. What do you consider a person then?
A crooked system is a crooked system. Do you think I am for a crooked system?
Are you suggesting we are in danger of running out of children?
No. In order for there to be people to take part in a democracy we require people.
Please dial back the hyperbole. You are free to make as many babies as you see fit.
It wasn't hyperbole. It is what would actually occur or you think non-existent hyperbole then I can't help you.
Calling me out for the hyperbole yet you started it? Isn't that hypocritical?
You said:
Suggesting that every embryo should be granted the full rights and protections of citizenship from conception essentially criminalizes miscarriage and eliminates all personal privacy.
"eliminate all personal privacy"
Hypocrite and a liar.
