- Even if we suppose Luke wrote Acts, he has never met either Paul or Peter. In fact, he contradicts Paul's own accounts. & that's the thing, no one of these characters has proof or testimony through unbroken chains to corroborate their supposed accounts & claims. Why are the sources of such foundational doctrine so unreliable & always written in implicit ambiguous text?? We believe in Twheed, a doctrine that's asserted virtually on every page of the Quran.
Again you are showing your ignorance of our religion, Yassine. Luke did personally know Paul, he traveled around with him for 2 years.
We certainly believe that God is One and Indivisible.
- Then, show me. But I will tell you, you can't, because it doesn't exist.
From the earliest days of the church, apostolic succession was seen as a mark of the true church. I will give you the same answer, ask a Bishop and they will show you their credentials. Apostolic succession certainly is a reality, and my directing you on how you can find out for yourself is not at all evidence against what I am claiming.
- Ghassan had many sects... by the 6th century, most Christians in the Middle East did indeed believe in the divinity of Jesus (pbuh). Many other didn't.
Well, their beliefs contradict The Apostlles, The Church Fathers, and The Church itself. Denying the divinity of Jesus simply isn't orthodox.
- Supposedly, & then he rejected the Law. The thing is, many of these 'heretical' or 'gnostic' gospels (such as the Gospel of Thomas, & the Gospel of Judas) agree with the Islamic account of Jesus & Mary (pbut), yet later on rejected by the Church in favor of other gospels ascribing some level of divinity onto Jesus.
They were rejected because we know where they came from. They were not written by the church.
I will of course point out that I believe Mohammed was a false prophet.