All opinions are a source of fake news, and CNN has no journalists on staff, only biased editorialists.
You can fall on only one of 2 sides, 1) orange man bad...or 2) Orange man REALLY bad.
Trump also is not a journalist, so you can never expect news to come from Trump, fake or otherwise. You can only gather his opinions.
This is about illegal immigration.This is what happens when you don't let Trump build the wall.Please build the wall, I like a avocados.
You're not very bright.But don't let me stop you from hatin'.Avocados are good for you.
Trump's tariffs have two purposes in mind:1. Extra tax revenue (because this Congress is stonewalling him at every turn funding-wise)
2. To force other countries to the negotiating table as to get them to comply with principles of free trade in areas where they are not right now, which stands to the detriment of U.S. exporters. Opening up China, in particular, would probably be a massive boost to our economy for many years to come.
As for the second reason, nobody expected the tariffs to do their job overnight. Reagan spent eight years playing hardball with the Soviet Union and even then it wasn't until his successor that the Eastern Bloc actually fell. If it's possible that Trump could eventually accomplish what he's set out to do, then clearly he's going to need more time.
Ok checkmate, you got me. Acosta mused in this CNN coverage that while people were desperately hoping for Trump to fail, Acosta gives praise to Trump for this speech.Congratulations CNN for providing a rare 3rd opinion about Trump besides the 99.9% 2 CNN positions of1) orange man bad...or2) Orange man REALLY bad.
"your words don't actually no real meaning to me. "Oh the Irony...
I'm not saying the tariffs themselves help the economy. But it's harmful to the competitveness of foreign companies for whom the U.S. market comprises a big share of their profits
An eventually X may is all you got to provide an actual reason to trust tariffs? Maybe China will budge. How about if they don't?Eventually countries like China may realize that the only way to remove this ill-effect on their economy is to sign a deal with the US. That's the point.
I hope that you get the help you deserve. Your irrationality clouds you from seeing what is actual. You think TDS is actually a real thing even though you have yet to bring a professional in the specific field who supports this or argued with logical errors with your doubling down of a false dichotomy (I still don't think you know what it means. Just type it in Google. I know it might be hard for an irrational person to actually research facts when all they see are false data but I am sure you can do it) and carried on with your pivot.Just hope for public safety that you remain at stage 3 infestation.
Chuck Schumer agreed in principle that China had it coming.
I just searched him up. The Wiki has him as a senator and has a degree in law. So how does he know what an economist would know if he is a professional when it comes to law not when it comes to the economy?Um, he's a guy who voiced his view on President Trump's policy, and you disagree with it?
If you want a good economy. An economist should be in charge. If you want a failed businessman who lied his way to get to the top then you want someone like Trump in charge.So spot on. This is why people who care about the economy need to stop electing lawyers like Schumer to run the economy and start electing entrepreneurs like Trump.
In other words a failed businessman is what you want into office. Gotcha.Trump lost most of his wealth in the last 2 years because he stopped focusing on his business and traded in his equity on his name recognition to run the country.
I'd like to see the same commitment from the current elected lawyers in the swampy D.C. to lose a proportionate amount of wealth by focusing more on the country and less on themselves.
Sadly, most lawyers accumulate wealth after being elected off of the backs of the poor taxpayers.
