Why doesn't the website automatically stop people who've done less than 2 non-troll debates from voting?
Auto Voting Bans
Posts
Total:
13
-->
@Speedrace
Lack of coding expertise.
Sad lol
-->
@Speedrace
Oh for God's sake, it's not there because initially we didn't have enough people for it to make sense to be implemented, now it makes sense since we already have lots of people with finished debates and I will add it sooner or later. I can't work on this stuff all my free time so things take time. I can't even get people to donate 30$ to cover the hosting expenses so cut me some slack here.
-->
@DebateArt.com
I didn't mean to insult you or anything and I wasn't asking for it to be implemented...you could try opening a GitHub so people can submit code though, I might be able to help :D
-->
@DebateArt.com
I didn't mean to insult you, I just meant the true reason is not something to laugh at, coding is very complex so what is the point of being ashamed in not knowing a particular part of it?
One thing to bear in mind is when you code this make it 'naked'. Don't make it hidden, the new user should know they can't vote so they don't write an entire RFD and then realise it was all for nothing post-writing.
-->
@Speedrace
My apologies, my rant was more towards RM and his logic.
-->
@RationalMadman
It's a trivial thing to implement, I am sure I can handle it :/
-->
@DebateArt.com
You need to implement this: (please excuse the c++)
Class Haters : public Object
{
public:
virtual Go( Object* obj )
{
Obj->Fuck();
}
}
void TestUser( Object* user )
{
Hater* hater( dynamic_cast<Hater*>(user) );
if(hater)
{
hater->Go(hater);
}
}
-->
@Ramshutu
Haha I knew it was easy lol
-->
@DebateArt.com
Did you get it implimented?
-->
@David
No, not yet but soon
-->
@DebateArt.com
That's why I was laughing because it seemed to easy, good thing you're the owner lol :D