Power Places

It is said that there are places of spiritual power around the world, at places like pyramids, cathedrals, mounds, and stone circles. Have you ever been to these places,and had a spiritual experience? If so, please share your experience.

"It is said".

And what is said, is mind projection.

And "power places" are nothing but mind projections.

And spiritual power and assumed experiences are also mind projections.

As such all spiritual experiences are real enough, though they may not necessarily be what we sometimes assume them to be.

Yeap theist are too stupid to know that. Good answer. 

What is "Spiritual Power"? Can you define or explain this phenomenon (that no one has ever observed)?

I have observed it many times. Both felt and seen. So have many others. 

I asked for a description or explanation, not a worthless testimony based on a lie. If you can't even explain what you're talking about, how can you expect others to offer anything?

The spiritual energy I see the most is blue, sometimes bluish purple. It has a strange, but distinct smell to it, and organic smell. This is the "good" spiritual energy, the bad is shades of red, smells like a lit match that was put out, and feels like crap. My explaination it that this is prana, or the life force that is inherent in all living things. 

No such thing as Prana Energy has ever been shown to exist, most likely your eyes have problems and you need to see an optometrist.

It is interesting that the inventor of Pranic Healing died at an early age in life.

Show me a quark

Show me dark matter

Quarks have been observed in particle accelerators, the gravitational effects of dark matter have also been observed. I know none of this is of any interest to you because you would have already looked into it. You simply don't understand anything scientific so you turn to magic. That's not a problem of course, until you start claiming magic is real, which is what you're doing here.

Neither has been "observed". 

Show it or admit you are wrong.

Oh I see, so if I can't personally escort you to a particle accelerator where they can run the experiment just for little ole' you, then it's all bs? The Standard Model is one of the most successful theories ever put forth as it explains (via evidence) most if not all fundamental particles. I can't help it if you're too lazy to learn about this stuff on your own, I'm not your teacher.

Since we've already dismantled Muncks garbage, why do you pursue this?

Munck had some interesting insights about tangents and numbers, and that is what I am persuing.

You're free to pursue whatever you want, but it's intellectually dishonest of you to show Munck in any way other than what he was; a fraud who bilked others of their money. Since everything Munck produced has been shown to be wrong, then you'll find you're just banging your head against a wall.

Prove he was a fraudster, or admit you are wrong.

Some people imagine things that are just not there. 

They contrive experiences which they imagine to be extrasensory.

Whereas all experience is actually self contained.

 

I'm not sure what you mean by self-contained.

Since you're both mathematically and scientifically illiterate and have never checked Muncks work, there's no reason for anyone to prove anything to you. Folks who aren't illiterate can see for themselves he is a fraud by checking his work and finding he was lying about many things so that he could fool others who didn't check his work. I already showed you he lied about Stonehenge. Here are some more examples of his lies...

- location of Earthwork at Newark

- center of Earthwork

- diameter of Earthwork

- distance of Giza to Newark

- location of Goloring in Germany

- relationship of Giza and Stonehenge

All of these lies were found in the first 15 minutes of his 3 hour video. Of course, Munck just balks at these obvious lies, but his gullible followers who never check his work gooble it all up.

Actually, I have checked, and came to the conclusion he was wrong about the code, which i already told you.

You keep repeating that he is liyng, which I have repeatedly ask for PROOF of, which you just gloss over. No proof?

All of your experience is within yourself. 

Therefore: spirituality is self contained and not generated by an external influence. 

Some people such as yourself like to think the opposite, which is absolutely fine.

I was simply pointing out the reality of the human condition.

And, I have provided evidence he was lying as have many others, as can you, but since you're mathematically and scientific illiterate, I don't suspect you ever will. The proof is in his work, which is based on lies.

Why do you believe that?

Where do you think your experiences are generated?

I think that sometimes it's fair to assert that knowledge exceeds belief.

Belief is generally regarded as acceptance without proof.

God.

A consensus of scientifically derived information, concludes that all bodily function is brain co-ordinated. This includes sensory function and by obvious association this would also include what is considered by some, to be spirituality.

I agree. But I don't believe  that consensus equates to reality.

God is merely belief and cannot be proven to be otherwise.

Your God is more than likely just another product of your imagination.

 

That's a possibility.

Reality can be as simple or as complicated as we care to make it.