Never heard of the word, but you did write "I don't hate or fear Christianity in the slightest" so I don't think you are a 'christianophobe'.
I see. But you have heard of the word "islamophobia" and have used it quite a few times.
I'd be a little more sympathetic to you if you hadn't mistaken me trying to be objective for being a Islamic apologist.
You are an apologist and I have no yearning for you to be sympathetic towards me at all, and I wouldn't expect you to change a habit of a lifetime.
As I have explained to you, what makes you an apologist is the fact the you label anyone/me who speaks out against this barbaric ancient 7th century ideology as, racist & bigoted. You accuse me of spreading hate and fear and division and of being "islamophobic". You ignore facts from Islamic sources, you accuse me of showing ONLY the bad side and worst side of Islam while ignoring repeated requests for you to show Islam in its better and good side. You tell me that you are "no fan of Islam" but never explain why. All the above is you being an apologist.
I think you present things as an over-simple black/white affair.
Telling it as it is I belive you mean? That is because islam is either b/w There is nothing to oversimplify with the quran or Islam. It makes itself extremely clear, it is honest and to the point of its goals, reasons and purposes.
That's what demagogues and rabble-rousers do.
Another veiled insult.
POINT 1
The reality involves a complicated mish-mash of history, politics, economics, culture etc.. I will continue to point that out.
Good. I hope you do.
But if you find anything I have ever posted that is actually supportive of Islam I'd be jolly surprised!
Being supportive of Islam is you accuse me of spreading hate and fear and division and of being "islamophobic". You ignore facts from islamic sources, you accuse me of showing the bad side and worst side of Islam while ignoring repeated requests for you to show Islam in its better and good side. You tell me that you are "no fan of Islam" but never explain why. Just like you are avoiding the question of what an "ordinary muslim" is on another thread.
If i want over-simplified non-analysis I can buy the daily mail. I don't need to read it here.
More veiled insults. Your problem is that you try very hard and purposefully to conflate Arabian history with the history of one man; muhammad and his so called "revelations".(as shown above POINT 1). You may think that you have suckerd others with this deciet but I can assure you , you have not suckerd me. The truth is you have no defence for Islam otherwise you would have played that card a long time ago after you have painted yourself into a corner, which you have done on many occasions.