Using Nice Words

Author: Vader

Posts

Total: 42
Topic's author
#1
Vader
Vader's avatar
Debates: 30
Posts: 14,984
5
8
11
Vader's avatar
Vader
5
8
11
Since naughty words are prohibited on this site and could really hurt someones feeling, here is the SupaDudz replacement factor

fucking bitch= good dog
egotistic asses=  charitable saints
fucking dumb kid= very smart adult
he is pathetic= he is innovative
scum of DART= hero of DART
crybaby bitch= thick skinned
no life= hollywood star
fucking pieces of shit= frickin piece of poop
fuck yourself= love yourself

with these new words, you can safely insult someone without the risk of being banned! have fun and if you don't use these replacements YOU WILL BE FUCKING PERMA BANNED RAAAAAWWRRR


#2
Melcharaz
Melcharaz's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 780
2
5
8
Melcharaz's avatar
Melcharaz
2
5
8
-->
@Vader
Or, hear me out, we could just not insult people?
#3
bsh1
bsh1's avatar
Debates: 14
Posts: 2,589
5
5
8
bsh1's avatar
bsh1
5
5
8
-->
@Vader
You realize right, you've just exposed your strategy? Kind of like one of those villains who reveals their whole plan when they think they've won, and then gets their asses whooped by the hero who can now predict their every move. 
Topic's author
#4
Vader
Vader's avatar
Debates: 30
Posts: 14,984
5
8
11
Vader's avatar
Vader
5
8
11
-->
@bsh1
oh yea that's true. i also have my secrets
#5
TheRealNihilist
TheRealNihilist's avatar
Debates: 44
Posts: 4,920
4
9
11
TheRealNihilist's avatar
TheRealNihilist
4
9
11
-->
@Vader
Can't you just not swear?
If your opponent does you can report them and laugh at how incapable they are at remaining rational. 
Topic's author
#6
Vader
Vader's avatar
Debates: 30
Posts: 14,984
5
8
11
Vader's avatar
Vader
5
8
11
-->
@TheRealNihilist
It's a life hack for swearing
#7
TheRealNihilist
TheRealNihilist's avatar
Debates: 44
Posts: 4,920
4
9
11
TheRealNihilist's avatar
TheRealNihilist
4
9
11
-->
@Vader
Has anyone been permanently banned? 
#8
David
David's avatar
Debates: 92
Posts: 1,218
4
7
10
David's avatar
David
4
7
10
-->
@TheRealNihilist
MagicAintReal was perma’d 

#9
TheRealNihilist
TheRealNihilist's avatar
Debates: 44
Posts: 4,920
4
9
11
TheRealNihilist's avatar
TheRealNihilist
4
9
11
-->
@David
What did he/she do?
Topic's author
#10
Vader
Vader's avatar
Debates: 30
Posts: 14,984
5
8
11
Vader's avatar
Vader
5
8
11
-->
@TheRealNihilist
Making multis and using those multis to vote bomb
#11
TheRealNihilist
TheRealNihilist's avatar
Debates: 44
Posts: 4,920
4
9
11
TheRealNihilist's avatar
TheRealNihilist
4
9
11
-->
@Vader
Where the votes taken down?
What did he have to say about the matter?
Does the site do try him/her with a judge voting system where the judges are Virtuoso and bsh1 and they can pick a lawyer (like RationalMadman or Ramshutu) to present their case? 
Topic's author
#12
Vader
Vader's avatar
Debates: 30
Posts: 14,984
5
8
11
Vader's avatar
Vader
5
8
11
-->
@TheRealNihilist
Where the votes taken down?
I think so
What did he have to say about the matter?
Said it wasn't him of course
Does the site do try him/her with a judge voting system where the judges are Virtuoso and bsh1 and they can pick a lawyer (like RationalMadman or Ramshutu) to present their case? 
No
#13
TheRealNihilist
TheRealNihilist's avatar
Debates: 44
Posts: 4,920
4
9
11
TheRealNihilist's avatar
TheRealNihilist
4
9
11
-->
@Vader
Did they know his IP as proof?
A trial would be great to watch and we can see if the person can defend his/her case or not. 

#14
TheRealNihilist
TheRealNihilist's avatar
Debates: 44
Posts: 4,920
4
9
11
TheRealNihilist's avatar
TheRealNihilist
4
9
11
-->
@David
@bsh1
Would you guys have a trial on the next person you decide to permanently ban? 
If not why? 
Topic's author
#15
Vader
Vader's avatar
Debates: 30
Posts: 14,984
5
8
11
Vader's avatar
Vader
5
8
11
-->
@TheRealNihilist
yes they knew based on IP
#16
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
That's not true, he used VPN highly efficiently to avoid IP checks catching him out. He was caught by other means.
#17
Ramshutu
Ramshutu's avatar
Debates: 43
Posts: 2,768
6
9
10
Ramshutu's avatar
Ramshutu
6
9
10
-->
@TheRealNihilist
Public trials are more about mob culture than determining the truth.

Magics example was difficult, as he didn’t leave any IP evidence. I managed to get one of his alt accounts voting priviledges removed on the grounds that he was obviously suspicious: then I later found that magic and the suspicious account had posted almost identical RFDs in a debate where Magics RfD was obviously the other RfD rewritten.

I also found some common language and textual ticks that were present in Magics accounts - but on no others. I won’t say what they are in case he decides to come back.

Gotta, that debate was epic in every sense of the word - from the start - to the arguments - to the debate itself - to the voting and the repercussions!

(The debate was Magic vs Death: “Humans depend on genetically modified organisms”.)

#18
TheRealNihilist
TheRealNihilist's avatar
Debates: 44
Posts: 4,920
4
9
11
TheRealNihilist's avatar
TheRealNihilist
4
9
11
-->
@Ramshutu
Public trials are more about mob culture than determining the truth.
What is the better alternative?

(The debate was Magic vs Death: “Humans depend on genetically modified organisms”.)
I can't find it. I copied everything within the speech-marks and it did not come up. Guess it must have been removed with Magic's account. 
#19
Ramshutu
Ramshutu's avatar
Debates: 43
Posts: 2,768
6
9
10
Ramshutu's avatar
Ramshutu
6
9
10
-->
@TheRealNihilist

#20
TheRealNihilist
TheRealNihilist's avatar
Debates: 44
Posts: 4,920
4
9
11
TheRealNihilist's avatar
TheRealNihilist
4
9
11
-->
@Ramshutu
Oh this guy. Saw him a while back on this site. How long did it take to bust him?
"So, by what Pro said of the rules, I was not bound in any way by rule number 3. In light of that, Pro's allegation of a rule violation doesn't make much sense."
Lol. I don't think I need to read more to understand how bad he is.
#21
Swagnarok
Swagnarok's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 1,266
3
2
6
Swagnarok's avatar
Swagnarok
3
2
6
-->
@Vader
Go love yourself you very smart adult. I'm going to kick your innovative saint so hard that everyone here will see how I've made you my good dog. Nothing but a Hollywood star who spends all his time on a debate website and you think that makes you a tough guy? Heck, everybody here just knows you as the hero of DART.

You mad bro? Go ahead: be a little thick skinned (person) and go crying to the mods to get mean old Swagnarok off your back. Love you, you frickin piece of jolly rancher (better than poop IMO).
#22
bsh1
bsh1's avatar
Debates: 14
Posts: 2,589
5
5
8
bsh1's avatar
bsh1
5
5
8
-->
@TheRealNihilist
Would you guys have a trial on the next person you decide to permanently ban? 
Trials are prohibited. They tend to devolve into mob rule and popularity contests.
#23
TheRealNihilist
TheRealNihilist's avatar
Debates: 44
Posts: 4,920
4
9
11
TheRealNihilist's avatar
TheRealNihilist
4
9
11
-->
@bsh1
Trials are prohibited. They tend to devolve into mob rule and popularity contests.
What is more effective? 

#24
bsh1
bsh1's avatar
Debates: 14
Posts: 2,589
5
5
8
bsh1's avatar
bsh1
5
5
8
-->
@TheRealNihilist
The status quo.
#25
TheRealNihilist
TheRealNihilist's avatar
Debates: 44
Posts: 4,920
4
9
11
TheRealNihilist's avatar
TheRealNihilist
4
9
11
-->
@bsh1
The status quo.
That is? 
#26
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@TheRealNihilist
bsh1 is the overlord, that's what it is.
#27
bsh1
bsh1's avatar
Debates: 14
Posts: 2,589
5
5
8
bsh1's avatar
bsh1
5
5
8
-->
@TheRealNihilist
Mods currently have jurisdiction over who to ban and for how long. The process involved in deciding whether to ban a user involves the accumulation of evidence of infractions, presenting that evidence to the offending user, allowing them the opportunity to defend their actions, and then reaching a decision on whether to ban and, if a ban is indicated, for how long.
#28
TheRealNihilist
TheRealNihilist's avatar
Debates: 44
Posts: 4,920
4
9
11
TheRealNihilist's avatar
TheRealNihilist
4
9
11
-->
@bsh1
Okay. 
allowing them the opportunity to defend their actions, and then reaching a decision on whether to ban and, if a ban is indicated, for how long.
Can't the public of this site be notified on these developments? Like a read-only forum post?
#29
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@TheRealNihilist
Of course not. If you fuck with him, he'll hire his goons to bully you and mock you on the thread. 

Disclaimer: This is a conspiracy theory based on 0 facts at all.
#30
bsh1
bsh1's avatar
Debates: 14
Posts: 2,589
5
5
8
bsh1's avatar
bsh1
5
5
8
-->
@TheRealNihilist
No.

A public ban log has twice been rejected in MEEP processes, and I see little utility in stripping the process of the privacy it currently provides to the impacted users.