In the Event of Another Government Shutdown

Author: Kasmic

Posts

Total: 14
Kasmic
Kasmic's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 11
0
0
2
Kasmic's avatar
Kasmic
0
0
2

From the article: "We should encourage our hard-working members of the TSA, the ATC, our flight attendants and pilots, and even the ground crews to go on strike if our incompetent government puts us through yet another pointless shutdown. "

What are your thoughts? Should government employees work without pay? How would you feel if they went on strike? 
Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 4,188
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
If they strike do they get paid when it all starts back up again? 
Kasmic
Kasmic's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 11
0
0
2
Kasmic's avatar
Kasmic
0
0
2
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
I would imagine not, though I dont imagine that the shut down would last long if they did go on a strike.

Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 4,188
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
-->
@Kasmic
They may be afraid to get what they got when the went on strike in the 80's. 
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,048
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
Not to mention it might give the government and the workers a reason to privatize those sectors.
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
Not to mention it might give the government and the workers a reason to privatize those sectors.
Contractors fare worse than federal employees during a shutdown, so I'm not sure privatization would do anything to fix things. [LINK]
Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 4,188
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
-->
@3RU7AL
If it was privatized the shut down would not effect them 
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,048
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
Yep. There is no real reason for the government to hire TSA when the airports can do the same thing more efficiently and with less cost.

22 Airports already have replaced TSA with private screeners.

3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
If it was privatized the shut down would not effect them 
I see.  You're talking about dissolving the entire federal budget.  Good luck with that.
Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 4,188
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
-->
@3RU7AL
No. We are talking about the specific jobs involving the airline and airline security being taken over by the airlines. Nothing to do with the whole Federal budget. Drama queen.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,048
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
Let him burn his strawman. Smells like an offering to his Socialism government gods.
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
Not to mention it might give the government and the workers a reason to privatize those sectors.
Just to be clear, are you advocating privatization of the Border Patrol, FDA, IRS, EPA, FAA, Fish and Wildlife Service?
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,048
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@3RU7AL
What does the word "might" mean to you in your indoctrinated marxist dictionary?
Ramshutu
Ramshutu's avatar
Debates: 43
Posts: 2,768
6
9
10
Ramshutu's avatar
Ramshutu
6
9
10
-->
@Greyparrot
In the specific context of your sentence, it was used to indicate a possibility that this could be used in order to justify the privatization of those sectors, which you seem to be implying is a good thing, hence giving the appearance that you’re  advocating privatization of the Border Patrol, FDA, IRS, EPA, FAA, Fish and Wildlife Service.

if you’re going to try and gaslight people, at least try and not be retarded about it.