Socialism: The New American Dream

Author: Kasmic

Posts

Total: 231
Kasmic
Kasmic's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 11
0
0
2
Kasmic's avatar
Kasmic
0
0
2
"Staggering inequality and lack of social mobility have had a clear impact on how society views capitalism. In a recent poll, 36% of registered voters think the U.S. should move toward socialism and away from capitalism."

https://medium.com/the-sensible-soapbox/socialism-the-new-american-dream-64720472293b

Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,288
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
36% of the people can't locate Venezuela on a world map apparently.
Kasmic
Kasmic's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 11
0
0
2
Kasmic's avatar
Kasmic
0
0
2
-->
@Greyparrot
Sure, 36% of people hold a position you disagree with, they must be dumb...
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,288
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Kasmic
I'm just saying there are people who thought Hugo Chavez was a great man for the people and equalized the wealth.

And there are people who don't have a clue what's going on in Venezuela right now or even where it is on the map.

BTW my roommate is from Venezuela, and he thinks you are dumb.
Kasmic
Kasmic's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 11
0
0
2
Kasmic's avatar
Kasmic
0
0
2
-->
@Greyparrot
I'm just saying that inferring that the 36% from the survey don't know geography or about current events because they disagree with you is asinine. 

BTW it is unclear why I should care that your roommate is from Venezuela or that he thinks I am dumb. 

In anycase, it seems you are more open to trolling on this website then in times past. Long time no see. 


Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,288
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Kasmic
It's not a matter of opinion at this point to say Socialism has utterly devastated Venezuela.

triangle.128k
triangle.128k's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 502
3
2
6
triangle.128k's avatar
triangle.128k
3
2
6
Socialism and Capitalism are both materialistic economic systems that rely on false premises and a degree of utopianism. 
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,288
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@triangle.128k
Socialism and Capitalism are both materialistic economic systems that rely on false premises and a degree of utopianism. 

Correct.

Capitalism assumes all people to be equally able to be equally productive and Socialism assumes all people in the government are extremely competent and actually care about poor people at all times. Neither which will ever be true.

Ramshutu
Ramshutu's avatar
Debates: 43
Posts: 2,768
6
9
10
Ramshutu's avatar
Ramshutu
6
9
10
-->
@Kasmic
Dont worry about this guy, he’s just trolling.

At the moment, the right are petrified of more worker and people friendly legislation and the associated problems the conservative donor class will likely face, and so GP, as someone who has had his face sewn onto the anus of propagandizing conservative talking points is simplying echoing the current conservative trends whilst Trump shouts “feed her!” Beside him.

The nuance here is that democratic socialism is not communism, or the type of controlled market of Venezuela. 50% of it is just the same type of thing that every other civilized country on the planet has, and would not give up, 40% is just the same type of thing as some other civilized countries have and who’s citizens would not give up, with the remaining 5% being interesting new policies along the same lines as the other 95%.

Obviously, the conservative media are freaking out. The high earners will be taxed more, and if the type of Scandinavian approach to government was implemented, the actual benefits (rather than faux benefits where workers were promised to be looked after, only to have massive tax breaks for the wealthy and the whole host of policy moves that favor cororations over the little guy  ), to the individual works would be enough to keep conservatives out of power for a generation.

Conservative media craps it out, GP swallows it, and as he can’t defend it, he’ll just troll with the occasional one liner, and nonsensical deflection.

triangle.128k
triangle.128k's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 502
3
2
6
triangle.128k's avatar
triangle.128k
3
2
6
-->
@Greyparrot
You know what free market Capitalism also rests on? Assumptions that their theories will hold true. They claim that the market is always free and self-regulating, and that a lack of restrictions won't result in a corporate elite rising to power and "purchasing" the entire nation. 

Greatly proven false...


The solution would be systems such as Corporatism or Distributism, or anything that allows the government to keep the economy in check without focusing on some stupid and false utopian dream of Socialism.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,288
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@triangle.128k
You know what free market Capitalism also rests on? Assumptions that their theories will hold true. They claim that the market is always free and self-regulating, and that a lack of restrictions won't result in a corporate elite rising to power and "purchasing" the entire nation. 
I'd say a good 90% of government regulations, especially the ones that limit opportunity and competition, are directly purchased by the 1%


triangle.128k
triangle.128k's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 502
3
2
6
triangle.128k's avatar
triangle.128k
3
2
6
-->
@Greyparrot
Quite an exaggeration, and those are inevitable in a free market economy. The free market only lasts so long until the market ceases to be free, and becomes powerful enough to buy out the government. Soon enough, it buys out the soul of the nation. 
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,288
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@triangle.128k
Not an exaggeration at all especially if you consider all the licensing and certifications inclusive as regulations limiting competition.
Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 4,188
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
-->
@Ramshutu
Not having the same opinion as someone doesn't make them a troll. 
Ramshutu
Ramshutu's avatar
Debates: 43
Posts: 2,768
6
9
10
Ramshutu's avatar
Ramshutu
6
9
10
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
Of course not.

Being a troll makes somronr a troll. Repeatedly failing to engage on any substance and instead rely on intentionally misleading and incendiary comments he won’t defend as the preferred method of discourse - makes someone a troll.

Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,288
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
I would be ok with this version of Sweden...not the garbage version politicians falsely claim just to grab power.
Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 4,188
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
-->
@Greyparrot
I am a big fan of school vouchers. I am very happy with the school system and my special needs child but if you are not or your child is gifted I see no reason to say in a crap school system. I have met some really outstanding home school parents and our Catholic schools are amazing here. Considering the low income use more services it makes sense. If the US could fund with no funding issue like the video shows Sweden did with pensions I would have no issue with day care and medical being funded by the Feds. Our politicians are not trust worthy enough to fund or programs and that is the problem in the US. But the politicians keep looking for someone else to blame. We need term limits and to get rid of lobbying. 
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
I'm just saying there are people who thought Hugo Chavez was a great man for the people and equalized the wealth.
And there are people who don't have a clue what's going on in Venezuela right now or even where it is on the map.
BTW my roommate is from Venezuela, and he thinks you are dumb.
A few bad examples do not completely disqualify a concept.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,288
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
I mean don't get me wrong, Sweden still has a lot of problems with heavy government regulation over private education industries, but the fact is that at some point, Sweden actually rolled back a lot of their regulations whereas (with the exception of Trump) USA has been steadily adding restrictive government regulations since FDR. I wouldn't mind paying a higher tax if the USA could drop the crony government regulations. Sadly, I don't see that happening with the current politics in the USA. Sweden only rolled back their government regulations because they were going bankrupt. The USA isn't quite there (yet)....
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,288
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@3RU7AL
How much Socialism is too much then? Where would you draw the line?
Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 4,188
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
-->
@Greyparrot
No system is perfect. There is always some issue with some part of the any set up but Sweden found a honey hole and it's working for them. Again their politicians are working for them. Norway is the same way. Where the US played with SS money Norway invests their countries funds without pinching into it. It's their for the people and programs. 
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
How much Socialism is too much then? Where would you draw the line?
There is no magic formula.

Each country has its own mix.  Sweden is not the same as Germany.  Finland is not the same as the UK.  Canada is not Japan.

Even China and Russia are a MIX of socialism and capitalism.

Profit motive does not always lead to best practices.  Free markets and deregulation are the playground of the billionaire class.

Venezuela was destroyed by some combination of poor planning and bad management.

If you see a fast-food establishment that goes out of business, do you instantly conclude that their business model is fundamentally flawed?

Does this mean that all fast-food establishments will inevitably also go out of business?  No.  It was most likely caused by some combination of poor planning and bad management.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,288
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@3RU7AL
Where would you draw the line?
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
Step One: [LINK]

Step Two: [LINK]

Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,288
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@3RU7AL
Use english words please.

Where would you draw the line?
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
Use english words please.
Where would you draw the line?
By reducing the influence of money in politics we will be able to create a government that actually represents the will of the people.

There is no "line".

There is no magic formula.

Each country has its own mix.  Sweden is not the same as Germany.  Finland is not the same as the UK.  Canada is not Japan.

Even China and Russia are a MIX of socialism and capitalism.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,288
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@3RU7AL
There is no line then?

So to you it would be perfectly acceptable for the government to control all key industries like energy, healthcare, and food production?

By reducing the influence of money in politics we will be able to create a government that actually represents the will of the people.
You do understand that Socialism hands over all the money and the control of that money to the government. If you are concerned about taking money away from the government then you should be rooting for near zero taxation and zero control over the economy so that there will be no reason to bribe the government.

This shows a serious lack of critical thinking skills when you are unable to draw a line at too much Socialism. On one hand you claim that Socialism can work if you do it right, then you demonstrate that there is no limit to how much control a country should hand over to the government.... completely disregarding how corrupt the USA government already is.

I can't take any proposals on Socialism seriously without some limit. Sure there is a mix, but all mixes have limits. You wouldn't use 98% butter in a chocolate cake recipe. There are limits to all mixes.

Considering our growing debt problem, it's likely the USA has already crossed that line, you just are not aware of it.
mustardness
mustardness's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,979
2
2
3
mustardness's avatar
mustardness
2
2
3
-->
@3RU7AL
Even China and Russia are a MIX of socialism and capitalism.

3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Greyparrot
There is no line then?
There is no "line".

There is no magic formula.

Each country has its own mix.  Sweden is not the same as Germany.  Finland is not the same as the UK.  Canada is not Japan.

Even China and Russia are a MIX of socialism and capitalism.

So to you it would be perfectly acceptable for the government to control all key industries like energy, healthcare, and food production?
Leap to conclusions much?  I said a MIX.

This shows a serious lack of critical thinking skills when you are unable to draw a line at too much Socialism.
This shows a serious lack of critical thinking skills when you are unable to comprehend a mix of capitalism and socialism.

On one hand you claim that Socialism can work if you do it right, then you demonstrate that there is no limit to how much control a country should hand over to the government....
What demonstration are you referring to?

completely disregarding how corrupt the USA government already is.
I have specifically and repeatedly highlighted government corruption.

I can't take any proposals on Socialism seriously without some limit. Sure there is a mix, but all mixes have limits. You wouldn't use 98% butter in a chocolate cake recipe. There are limits to all mixes.
Please quantify your ratios.

Considering our growing debt problem, it's likely the USA has already crossed that line, you just are not aware of it.
What exactly is your proposal? 

Socialism neither causes nor alleviates government corruption.

Socialism is not the problem.

Socialism is also not the solution.
Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 4,188
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
The US is 50 Sweden's on in one area. As long as politicians are out for their state it's going to work this way. We were never meant to be unified the way people want us to be. Correction, 48 in one area.