Are we the real motivators or is everything actually self motivated?
Our eternally existent and finite occupied space Universe, is the only perpetual-motion-machine.
See 1st law of thermodynamics, that, does not take into account gravity or dark energy.
My explorations have led to the following conclusions via my discovery of all prime numbers ---except 2 and 3-- falling on the same line in semi-linear 1Dimension and on two radii of a hexagon in 2D.
( ) = positive shaped geodesic gravity found on outer surface of a torus based on ssequential enumeration and inversion-outversion ---ex (><)--- at peak of outer curvature
......alll prime numbers except 2 and 3 fall on this outer semi-great circle peak...........
)( = negative shaped geodesic of dark energy as found on inner surface torus based on my sequential enumeration and inversion-outversion ---ex <)(>(---- at peak of negative curvature
.......0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36 etc triangulated fundamentals of Observed Time Reality...
/\/\/ = resultant sine-wave associated with reality{ Observed Time } inside the tube of the same torus mentioned above
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Possible related findings to above are as follows;
3.14 = Pi i.e. great circle related to diameter of same circle
3.113 * 66.4 = 206.7032 approximate electron-muon mass
0.0077 * 66.4 = 0.511 28 approximate electron mass
66.4 is my Pi-Time finding and explained further below in Part Two.
Electron mass is 0.511 and the electron repeats itself asthe muon-electron and has a much greater mass of 206.7572826.
I.e., 0.511 plus 206.2462826 = the mass ofmuon-electron 206.7572826
Above, I change the value of Pi{ 3.14 } to 0.0077
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Part Two
Here is how I arrived at my Pi-Time value of 66.4
97.40 90 9 10 34 00 24 37 = Pi to the 4th power{ Pi^4 } and time is considered as 4th Dimension{ not 3D space } after XYZ,3D space 4th D is classically Time.
97.40 minus 31{ seeXYZ aka 3D below } = 66.4 ergo Pi-Time is what left over once we remove XYZ {3D } space value 31.
31.00 62 7 66 is resultant of Pi^3 andthat is
#7 in the overall 7th position as found in Pi^3{ XYZ aka 3D } 31.00
…see below Part Four.....
24.35 22 7 27 is resultant of Pi^4 divided by 4 ---division by 4 is my process of ...'renormalization'...---- and that is
#7 in 7th position as foundin Pi^4/4{ re-normalization } aka Pi-Time { 66.4 } wherein no ..'renormalization'... process is done and rather we just subtract the XYZ value of 31 from Pi^4.
'renormalization' process is my attempt to make Pi^4 power be equilvant to XYZ 3rd powering process ergo returning 4th power to a cartesian { 90 degree } associated value. This is interesting to me because those two numbers associate with the following;
31 = total primary great circle planes of the 5-fold icosa(20}hedron curved or Euclidean
24 = number of chords of the 4-fold cubo{6}-octa{8}hedron aka Vector Equilbrium aka jitterbug see
LINK 1
5-fold Icosahedron has 30 chords and 31 great circles
4-fold Cubo-octahedron has 25 great circle/polygonal plane and 24 chords
So we see a reversal of values as the associate to Pi when compared to actual two polyhedra under consideration above.
(><)(><) = icon or bisection representation of torus with inversions, wherein each torus I consider to be a vector{ 3D or 4D } that is representative one great circle of the two polyhedral mentioned above
And again, this torus idea ---inside-outing of the four line/levels---- stems from my original prime number discovers as found on semi-linear four line/levels{ see below } and a hexagon in 2D.
0..............................6......................................12...........................................18...................
.....1....................5.........7........................11.............13..........................17............19...................
...........2..........4..................8..........10.............................14...........16...........................20................
................3..............................9.............................................15...........................................21......
Compare the above to Arthur Youngs similar, not exactly the same explorations, wherein he starts with number 1 and I start with number 0.
Here below is my inside-outing of the above and led me to my iverted-outever torus ideas, and again, on differrent pathway than Arthur arrived at torus ideas.
......1..............................5p..............7p...............................11p............13p..................................17p.............19p..............................23p
.....
0.............................................6...................................................12......................................................18................................................
.....................3..................................................9.......................................................15......................................................21.................
..............2............4.....................................8............10.....................................14..............16.....................................20............22............