Best Explanation of Black Hole - Quantum Gravity Yet

Part 1

Found this 3 month old vid yesterday. Narrated by Briane Green and Participant: Andrew Strominger and Vafa came along before the leading string theorist, Juan Malcendena  and his AsD/CFT  ----leading edge of string theories regarding black holes---   showing how Gen. Relativities math predicts these incomplete null geodesics ---aka a singularity-- is an incomplete theory. 

Go to 58:25 to see the orbiting photon ring{s}---geodesics--  around a black hole { M87 } the physicist  Andrew  and Narrator Brian Greene show the technology to know the geometry of the black hole is very close to experimentally doability. 

This vid is from the World Science festival supportedd by Johna Templteon Foundation.

To get some context for the orbiting photon rings --via G Relativity equations-- you have to go back 56; or 54 etc time stamp.  If your not familiar with this info, you will be satisfied greatly.

For me especially because, the prior geodesics --as lines-of-relationship embracing object{ ex black hole (O) }-- preceding the post above, seems very relevant to me { my bias of course }. Anyway Ive only watched half of the vid --with much pertinent, historical context--- till about 1:10:00. 🍀 😇 👈

Part 2

Go to 52:00 in the World Science Festival vid, I posted above where Andrew tells how he was asked by the astronomers who took the photo of M87 black hole, how can we learn more about the black hole at center from this photo. That is all interesting after that and leads to GR and photonic rings  --not yet seen--- tho by 2031 they hope the money will appropriate the first launched technology to gather the first photonic rings info from M87.

The photonic rings are about understanding how black holes --specifically M87--  shape space and time.

The only other point I want make is regarding the loss of information or not, with regards to black holes.  Start at time stamp 44:40.  Early on Andrew states in early 90's it was 50/50 with most physicists/cosmologist etc, and now it is like  998 believe information is not lost and 2 who believe it is.

Since I first learned of singularities, and latter on this information loss or not in black holes, Ive never believe in singularties --yes GR math predicts it and Penrose 1965 verifies the math is correct, tho that is incomplete theory--.

FLRW, as I presented from the vid Andrew Strominger, it early 90's it was a 50:50 ratio of scientists who believed information ---because of GR's math, that information is lost via incomplete null geodesics of a photons trajectory inside the black hole aka singularity.

And states, ---the vid was posted 3 months ago... that, of some 1000 scientists, only two of the still believe that GR's math is the final correct theory ergo, they believe information is truly lost as a singularity.

Ive never ever believed this singularity concept. 

Before that tho I present this blurb and link.

..." In 1996, Strominger and Vafa showed that there are indeed C⋅exp(c3A/4Gℏ)microstates (Cis a subleading factor not affecting entropy) in a particular extremal black hole with a macroscopic horizon in five-dimensional spacetime.

..This work has been followed by 1,600+ other papers...snip..

Why the number 4 in the Bekenstien-Hawking formula on Hawkings tombstone?

Archimedes  was first known person to discover, that, the area of four, equatorial,  ---i.e. great circles--- bisections of a sphere are equal to the surface area of the sphere.

Area =  4 * Pi  * times radius of sphere squared

A = 4 * { Pi * r^2 }

The Vector Equlibrium { VE } --see Synergetics 1 and 2 B Fuller link bottom of this page--- aka cubo-octahedron, is defined by four, hexagonal, great hexagons.  

So the differrence in area between a hexagon --with radius 0.5--- of a circle  around the hexagon, and tangent at hexagons 6 vertices is area of the circle minus the area of the hexagon.

0.6495 hexagons area when radius is 0.5

0.1358 differrence in greater { gained } area of the circle over the hexagon i.e. by conceptual  spinning of hexagon, the area increases by 0.1358

.." 455.02 The sum of the areas of the four great-circle discselegantly equals thesurface area of the sphere they define. The area of one circle is r2. The area of the surface of a sphere is 4r2.The area of the combined four folded great-circle planes is also 4r2 and all four great-circle planes go through the exact center of the sphere and, between them, contain no volume at all. The sphere contains the most volume with the least surface enclosure of any geometrical form. This is a cosmic limit at maximum. Here we witness the same surface with no volume at all, which qualifies the vector equilibrium as the most economic nuclear "nothingness" whose coordinate conceptuality rationally accommodates all radiational and gravitational interperturbational transformation accounting. In the four great-circle planes we witness the same surface area as that of the sphere, but containing no volume at all. This too, is cosmic limit at zero minimumness. "..

AI.." Hawking's Confirmation:

Stephen Hawking later confirmed Bekenstein's conjecture by showing that black holes emit thermal radiation (now known as Hawking radiation) and that the entropy of a black hole is indeed proportional to the area of its event horizon. "...

http://scholarpedia.org/article/Bekenstein-Hawking_entropy#:~:text=If%20A%20stands%20for%20the%20surface%20area,r_h%5E2%5C%20%2C%20or%20%5Ctag%7B2%7D%20A=16%5Cpi(GM/c%5E2)%5E2%20%5C%20.

Evaporating black holes are white from the information being emitted and event horizon.

FLRW, here is Euclidean visual for evaporation of black hole emitting its internal information ---coding---.

The tetrahedron closes in on itself in this graphic, yet the its 4 planes/openings defined by  6 occupied space vectors { lines-of-relationship } remain, as it goes to zero volume and transforms into Vector Equlibrium { VE } ---aka cubo-octahedron---  that, has an external set of twelve, 2D triangle wings as the information or black hoe being emitted outward.

maintaining the the original four equilateral planes > becomes zero volume, yet,

> 44 new smaller and regular triangles of which the 12 are external, and 8 are surface of the VE, and

> 6 regular surface squares/openings, ergo, a total of 24 newly created lines-of-relationship, however,

>  since the original 4 planes are openings  ex truly non-occupied space,  the VE is just a meta-space concept, unless,

Yes I think so.  However, in doing so --and if we see this transformation as our finite Universe of these only these four, great, dual invaginated, space and time horn tori---  as the Big Bang initiation phase, once again over eternity, then I think we are mistaken to believe they do move beyond a tangent, or even beyond, as  overlapping and interfering with each other.

That would mean a lost of occupied space integrity aka the whole, the One/Uni-verse.  That is not possible, because of dual integrity of Gravity and Dark Energy, eternally existent and conneted, two sides of the same set of those four space and time tori.

^v^v = physical reality via sine-wave association as observable { quantize-able } time

So that is one view of Universe of as a black hole coming to zero volume, and in process initiates next phase transformation Universe, using only four space and time tori.    Now think of zillions and zillions of these tori ---as finite, collective, inter-connected set---  doing this everywhere at once, or close to the same time. BAM! WOW!