I have defeated debate art.

Author: Mall
debating
defeat
victorious

Posts

Total: 12
Topic's author
#1
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 413
Posts: 2,240
4
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
4
4
4
When I first started, just about everybody wanted a chance at taking down the debate dot org native.

I mean to just be able to stand on what you believe, defend what you believe, because you don't like that, gets you emotional, react immaturely and don't reciprocate my disposition.

My disposition is I expect you to argue what your position is. Even if you can't see your error, I'm not going to block you, run from you as prey from a bold lion. 

If I'm so easy to refute, why do you flee from light work?

It's because I actually have defeated you. I was able to get into your psyche and mentally defeat you into distress allowing me to override and win over your power of being calm, cool, collected, no hard feelings copastetic attitude.

It's just a game , it's just a debate .


Topic's author
#2
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 413
Posts: 2,240
4
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
4
4
4
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
Tell them, it's just a debate.

Like you told me, you the second lion , right. They got scared and ran you off the prideland.
#3
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 203
1
2
5
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
1
2
5
-->
@Mall
Yes, its just a debate. Fear of debating something is irrational and harmful, because then you cant see who is right on the issue.

Yeah, I cant debate some topics here, because it upsets people.
#4
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 203
1
2
5
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
1
2
5
-->
@Mall
It's because I actually have defeated you. I was able to get into your psyche and mentally defeat you into distress allowing me to override and win over your power of being calm, cool, collected, no hard feelings copastetic attitude.
I have always wondered about if something is so easily defeated in a debate, why do they run away and get upset? If they dont want to debate, fine. But they have no reason to get upset.
Topic's author
#5
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 413
Posts: 2,240
4
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
4
4
4
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
They want to debate as long as they can control me and debate how they want me to debate. 

One person said to me, I don't admit I'm wrong.

Well duh, when I'm firm on my position, why would I do that? Duh.

So because I'm relentless, steadfast in what I do like they do by the way, they make the double standard and avoid me.

Hopefully, causing me to throw up my minds and leave the website like silent treatment at a party. Let's all come together and don't entertain or engage anymore, this person will go away.

Which is proof I've defeated them certainly psychologically.

Then they can't stand what you've done, booted you out but you've resurrected, returned , come back to live again, whatever , you've managed to do so under a technicality.

If you notice, several individuals have left this site. Those are the ones that more likely would contend with me and be more reasonable and not so sensitive. But due to the characterization of this site, it has caused them folks to move on.


#6
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 203
1
2
5
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
1
2
5
-->
@Mall
They want to debate as long as they can control me and debate how they want me to debate. 
I hold opinion that person can debate in any way he wants and about anything, but people here dont agree. I think the only speech which should be controlled is the endless spam which physically doesnt give others chance to talk, but in formal limited debates, thats not really the issue.
#7
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,812
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
They want to debate as long as they can control me and debate how they want me to debate. 
I hold opinion that person can debate in any way he wants and about anything, but people here dont agree. I think the only speech which should be controlled is the endless spam which physically doesnt give others chance to talk, but in formal limited debates, thats not really the issue.
There should be effective moderation of the debates.
#8
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,862
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
Was the title of this topic...Let's talk bollocks for a bit?
#9
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,434
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
Bollocks is a word of Middle English origin meaning "testicles". The word is often used in British English and Irish English in a multitude of negative ways; it most commonly appears as a noun meaning "rubbish" or "nonsense", an expletive following a minor accident or misfortune, or an adjective to describe something that is of poor quality or useless. 
#10
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,862
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@FLRW
Hey, Big Boy.

I see that you've dressed for Shila.

Interestingly, we also have "the dogs bollocks", which means the opposite of bollocks.

So if I were to say that you look the dogs bollocks, I would be affording you a huge compliment.

Having a huge compliment is also a euphemism...Though hopefully Shila won't be offended by such a huge compliment.

Such is the joyous flexibility of the English language.

And rigidity aside, the joyous flexibility of such a hugely complimentary euphemism is certainly the dogs bollocks.

#11
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,812
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@FLRW
Bollocks is a word of Middle English origin meaning "testicles". The word is often used in British English and Irish English in a multitude of negative ways; it most commonly appears as a noun meaning "rubbish" or "nonsense", an expletive following a minor accident or misfortune, or an adjective to describe something that is of poor quality or useless. 
Would that apply to Trump merchandise?
#12
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,434
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@Shila

Would that apply to Trump merchandise?
Of course.