Is the US currently being run by an oligarchy [the Trump administration]?

Author: fauxlaw

Posts

Total: 3
fauxlaw
fauxlaw's avatar
Debates: 78
Posts: 3,759
4
7
10
fauxlaw's avatar
fauxlaw
4
7
10
Is the U.S. currently being run by an oligarcy, i.e., the Trump administration, as some Democrats accuse?
First, do we know what an oligarcy is? You tell me. I have a definition from my Oxford English Dictionary [OED], unabridged [20 volumes; the moist authoritative dictionary of the English language in existence], but, since this question does not represent my claim, I charge those who do make the claim to admit that which is claimed by definition.

Seems simple enough: do you know what you're talking about? This is something like the question: do you know where Moscow is found? [no, I do not mean the cities in ID, KS, ME, MD, OH, PA, TN, or TX]. Justify your definition by explanation.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 27,420
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@fauxlaw
Musk has been quite vocal against subsidies in many areas. He’s openly criticized government handouts and corporate welfare, arguing that companies should succeed based on their own merit, not through taxpayer-funded assistance. In fact, he’s even made comments about how Tesla didn’t need subsidies, and he often points out that his companies, Tesla and SpaceX, were successful despite not relying heavily on government support, even though they received some early on.

This is particularly important because it challenges the very definition of oligarchy. Oligarchies typically thrive exclusively on tight political connections and subsidies that protect and enhance the wealth of the elite. Musk’s position is different in that he actively criticizes and works to reduce dependence on these subsidies. It’s a sign that his focus is on innovation and competition, not on collusion with the government to secure privileged benefits. Musk has actually disrupted entrenched industries, including the automobile and aerospace sectors, rather than protecting monopolies or maintaining the status quo.

Whether it’s moving Tesla's headquarters to Texas to avoid California’s high taxes instead of playing the government grift game for exemptions, or rejecting blanket subsidies, Musk shows that he's not a part of a closed, self-serving elite. Instead, he’s advocating for a more competitive environment where innovation drives success, not political influence.

fauxlaw
fauxlaw's avatar
Debates: 78
Posts: 3,759
4
7
10
fauxlaw's avatar
fauxlaw
4
7
10
-->
@Greyparrot
 [Musk is] not a part of a closed, self-serving elite
Great post! I completely agree to the obvious as you described it.