US government spending is 7 trillions now, with 2 trillion budget deficit.

Isnt this amazing?

If same deficit keeps up, it means that US government will print 10 trillion dollars in next 5 years. That is 2 trillion printed dollars per year.

The more the US government budget grows, the less things people will have.

Think about it. 7 trillion dollars is over 20000$ per every American.

US government budget also reduces productive workforce, which reduces production further.

USA needs to turn to militarism, where the only thing government invests a lot in is military.

US government has no place in schools, hospitals, and healthcare. These need to be mandatory, but private, like in Switzerland. The police also needs to be just private security, with government military being the one who solves only bigger issues like mass murderers and gangs.

So US budget needs to be only 2 trillions. 1 trillion for military, and 1 trillion as help for the poor. (Thats 20,000 per year to every poor person.).

US government also needs to control the rich and not let them have big and expensive houses, cars, private planes. They can live a good life, but they must serve people more as well.

US government also needs to open few factories with robot workers to begin mass production for the people.

I probably should begin charging your country for all the advice I give you for free tho. I mean, you wont get these quality advices anywhere else, and they will turn your country into a much better one than what you have now.

US government additionally will save money by abolishing taxes and replacing it with money printing.

You anyway print 2 trillions per year, and with this new system, 2 trillions willl be enough.

By abolishing taxes, all the money payed to collect taxes will be saved too.

Vast human populations are essentially just cannon fodder for the progressive elite.

Totalitarian regimes are fairly honest about this.

Whereas "The West" is somewhat more subtle.

What we've seen though, is that hordes of fanatics can still defeat techno-weaponry.

Doge.

It needs to cut expenses by at least 3 trillion.

Doge.

Though Doge has the word “department” in its name, it is not an official government department - the type of body that has to be established through an act of Congress and typically employs thousands of staff.

I’m sorry, what? You want the US to turn to militarism and keep people from buying expensive cars and houses? What? Where is the logic behind this?

He wants government to cut back on spending so they don’t have to raise taxes. That way the people will have more to spend on expensive cars and houses.

On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump issued an executive order (E.O.) titled “Establishing andImplementing the President’s ‘Department of Government Efficiency’” (DOGE), which reorganized an entity in the Executive Office of the President (EOP), the U.S. Digital Service, as the U.S. DOGE Service,using the same acronym as its predecessor (USDS). 

The United States Digital Service (USDS) is a technology unit[3][4] housed within the Executive Office of the President of the United States and established by Congressional appropriations.

Your algorithm is contradictory.

Remember than Trump has spent $300 million going to the Super Bowl and Daytona 500 and living in Mar-a-Lago.

No, it isn’t so that people can spend more on cars. Best.Korea literally said people shouldn’t be allowed to buy expensive cars or houses.

Best.Korea is struggling to learn Japanese. He should not be taken seriously about American capitalism.

Why are you talking about Zed's pfp?

Could be the coin. Depends on how unserious you want to be today.

You were trying to quote what Best.Korea said about buying expensive cars and houses.

Frankly, I wouldn’t pay you a dime for your suggestions.  You ignore the benefit of local and state governments having a greater role in our lives than feds. Yes, there are effectIve fed gov matters, but education and healthcare are better served by local gov’t. The poor will become slaves of gov’t by a $20k annual stipend. Teach them self-sufficiency and how to achieve it. Teach them the value of work. As the ancient Chinese once taught (they don’t anymore) give a man a fish; feed him for a day. Teach him to fish, feed him for life. Don’t saddle him with the idea that he should have a limited amount of money. Let his personal ambition soar. Not living here, you have no knowledge of the generosity wealth allows the wealthy. Take their money from them, they can no longer be generous. One-percenters (a couple of thousand of us) already pay over 45% of tax revenue. Considering their largesse, for their numbers, that’s already “a fair share” to quote Biden.  He was as dumb as they come. Socialism has a major problem: it has no clue how to create wealth. It only knows spending, and when money runs out,  socialism collapses.

You want robot factories? Fine, let robots do your direct labor. Are they also going to buy your raw materials to make your widgets? Are they going to buy the inside facilities in which you build your production line with its necessary support facilities? Are robots going to do all your maintenance? Are they going to market and sell, deliver and warrant your widgets’ reliability? And what do yo do when a competitor develops a better widget with greater reliability and more features?

These are all concerns Karl Marx never learned, industrial genius he is alleged to be…

Like China coming up with a better but cheaper AI app.

I am not convinced China has home-grown AI superiority in either cost or reliability. They do not account for their in-process failures. They are piled in a closed room no one sees, except I personally made it a factor to continue their status as a supplier to the company I worked for that developed the first 3.5” hard disk drive to allow the first production of laptop computers. They were fired. I’ve seen nothing since out of China to convince me they’ve changed.

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

Yeah, Best.Korea said it in English. You told me that Best.Korea is struggling to learn Japanese; Best.Korea didn’t say anything in Japanese, she said it in English.

#20

Sort of emphasises the fact that cooperation would achieve quicker results.

Therefore one could suggest that the status quo is an inbuilt genetic strategy.

Evolutionary checks and balances as it were.

#23

Yes,  agreed. In this particular case, already knowing the company mentioned in my #20 never performed failure analysis even after teaching the process to them, and observing their resistance, I fired them on the spot.

it would have sounded different if he said it in Japanese.

It would have been more accurate.

Ah. I get it now.

Glad I could help.